Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:39:35.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Burgess Shale arthropod Mollisonia (M. sinica new species): new occurrence from the Middle Cambrian Kaili fauna of southwest China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Xingliang Zhang
Affiliation:
Early Life Institute and Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xian, 710069, P. R. China,
Yuanlong Zhao
Affiliation:
Institute of Resources and Environment Science, Guizhou University of Technology, Guiyang, 550003, P. R. China
Ruidong Yang
Affiliation:
Institute of Resources and Environment Science, Guizhou University of Technology, Guiyang, 550003, P. R. China
Degan Shu
Affiliation:
Early Life Institute and Department of Geology, Northwest University, Xian, 710069, P. R. China,

Extract

The Early Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstätte, Yunnan Province, Southwest China, has become one of the most celebrated Cambrian fossil Lagerstatten not only for perhaps the earliest biota of soft-bodied organisms in the Phanerozoic (Yuan and Zhao, 1999; Zhang et aI., 2001; but see Budd and Jensen, 2000), but also for a number of significant discoveries (Shu et al., 1996a, 1996b, 1999a, 1999b, 2001), proven to be of particular importance for our understanding the Cambrian explosion. Also in Southwest China, Guizhou Province, there is a very significant, although less acclaimed, Middle Cambrian soft-bodied fauna as well, namely the Kaili fauna, which occurs in the Kaili Formation in Kaili area (Kuizhou). The age of the Kaili Formation ranges from late Early to early Middle Cambrian. Regionally, the Kaili Formation is about 222 m thick and consists of three parts. The lowermost part (late Early Cambrian, about 55 m thick) is dominated by thin, calcareous siltstone strata interbedded with limestone layers at the base. The middle part (early Middle Cambrian, ca. 123 m) consists of dark green mudstone and shale, while the uppermost part (ca. 44 m) is composed of interbedded limestone and silty shale. The Kaili fauna is derived from mudstones in the middle part of the formation (Zhao et aI., 1994; Zhu et aI., 2000).

Type
Paleontological Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Briggs, D. E. G., Erwin, D. H., and Collier, F. J. 1994. The fossils of Burgess Shale. The Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., 238 p.Google Scholar
Budd, G. E., and Jensen, S. 2000. A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla. Biological Reviews, 75(2):253295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delle Cave, L., and Simonetta, A. M. 1991. Early Palaeozoic arthropods and problems of arthropod phylogeny: with some notes on taxa of doubtful affinities, p. 189244. In Simonetta, A. M. and Conway Morris, S. (eds.), The Early Evolution of Metazoa and Significance of Problematic Taxa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dzik, J., Zhao, Y.-L., and Zhu, M.-Y. 1997. Mode of life of the Middle Cambrian eldonioid lophophophorate Rostadiscus. Palaeontology, 40(2):385396.Google Scholar
Hou, X. 1987. Three new large arthropods from Lower Cambrian, Chengjiang, eastern Yunnan. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 26:236256. (In Chinese with English summary)Google Scholar
Hou, X., Chen, J., and Lu, H. 1989. Early Cambrian new arthropods from Chengjiang, Yunnan. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 28(1):4257. (In Chinese with English summary)Google Scholar
Jell, P. A. 1980. Two arthropods from the Lancefiedian (La 1) of central Victoria. Alcheringa, 4:3746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1991. Middle Cambrian biotic diversity: examples from four Utah Lagerstätten, p. 7798. In Simonetta, A. M. and Conway Morris, S. (eds.), The Early Evolution of Metazoa and Significance of Problematic Taxa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shu, D., Zhang, X., and Chen, L. 1996a. Reinterpretation of Yunnanozoon as the earliest known hemichordate. Nature, 380:428430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shu, D.-G., Luo, H.-L., Conway Morris, S., Zhang, X.-L., Hu, S.-X., Chen, L., Han, J., Zhu, M., Li, Y., and Chen, L.-Z. 1999b. A Lower Cambrian vertebrates from South China. Nature, 402:4246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shu, D.-G., and Chen, L. 1994. Cambrian Palaeobiogeography of Bradoriida. Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Science, 9(3):289299.Google Scholar
Shu, D., Chen, L., Han, J., and Zhang, X. 2001. An Early Cambrian tunicate from China. Nature, 411:472473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shu, D.-G., Conway Morris, S., and Zhang, X.-L., 1996b. A Pikaia-like chordate from the Lower Cambrian of China. Nature, 384:157158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shu, D.-G., Conway Morris, S., Zhang, X.-L., Chen, L., Li, Y., and Han, J. 1999a. A Pipisid-like fossil from Lower Cambrian of South China. Nature, 400:746749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonetta, A. M. 1964. Observazioni sugli arthropodi non trilobiti della <Burgess Shale> (cambriano medio). III Contributo: I Generi Molaria, Habelia, Emeraldella, Parahabelia (nov.), Emeraldoides (nov.). Monitore Zoologico Italiano, 72:215231.Google Scholar
Simonetta, A. M., and Delle Cave, L. 1975. The Cambrian non-trilobite arthropods from the Burgess Shale of British Columbia—a study of their comparative morphology, taxonomy and evolutionary significance. Palaeontographia Italica, 69:137.Google Scholar
Sundberg, F. A., Yuan, J.-L., Mccollum, L. B., and Zhao, Y.-L. 1999. Correlation on the Lower-Middle Cambrian boundary of South China and western United States of America. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 38(supplement):102111.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1912. Middle Cambrian Branchiopoda, Malacosstraca, Trilobita and Merostomata. Cambrian Geology and Paleontology II. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 57:145228.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1985. The Burgess Shale. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Yuan, J.-L., and Zhao, Y.-L. 1999. Subdivision and correlation of Lower Cambrian in southwest China, with a discussion of the age of Early Cambrian series biota. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 38(supplement):116131. (In Chinese with English summary)Google Scholar
Yuan, J.-L., and Huang, Y.-Z. 1994. Preliminary report on non-trilobite arthropods from Lower-Middle Cambrian Kaili Formation of Southwest Guizhou, South China. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 33(3):329334. (In Chinese with English summary)Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Shu, D., Li, Y., and Han, J. 2001. New sites of Chengjiang fossils: crucial windows on the Cambrian explosion. Journal of the Geological Society of London, 158:211218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X., Han, J., and Shu, D. 2002. New occurrence of the Burgess Shale arthropod Sidneyia (S. sinica sp. nov.) in the Early Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstätte (South China), and the revision of arthropod Urokodia. Alcheringa 1, 26:18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Y.-L., Huang, Y.-Z., and Gong, X.-Y. 1994b. Echinoderm fossils of Kaili fauna from Taijiang, Guizhou. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 33(3):305324. (In Chinese with English summary)Google Scholar
Zhao, Y.-L., Qian, Y., and Li, X.-S. 1994C. Wiwaxia from Early-Middle Cambrian Kaili Formation in Taijiang, Guizhou. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 33(3):359366. (In Chinese with English summary)Google Scholar
Zhao, Y.-L., Yuan, J.-L., Huang, Y.-Z., Mao, J.-R., Qian, Y., Zhang, Z.-H., and Gong, X.-Y. 1994a. Middle Cambrian Kaili fauna in Taijiang, Guizhou. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 33(3):263271. (In Chinese with English summary)Google Scholar
Zhao, Y.-L., Yuan, J.-L., Zhu, M.-Y., Yang, R.-G., Guo, Q.-J., Qian, Y., Huang, Y.-Z., and Pan, Y. 1999. A progress reports on research on the early Middle Cambrian Kaili biota, Guizhou, P. R. C. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 38(supplement):115. (In Chinese with English summary)Google Scholar
Zhu, M.-Y., Van Iten, H., Cox, R. S., Zhao, Y.-L., and Erdtmann, B. D. 2000. Occurrence of Byronia Matthew and Sphenothallus Hall in the Lower Cambrian of China. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 74(3):227238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar