Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T17:57:48.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mazon Creek Cycloidea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Frederick R. Schram ,
Ronald Vonk  and
Cees H. J. Hof
Frederick R. Schram
Affiliation:
Institute for Systematics and Population Biology, University of Amsterdam, Post Box 94766, 1090 GT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Ronald Vonk
Affiliation:
Institute for Systematics and Population Biology, University of Amsterdam, Post Box 94766, 1090 GT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Cees H. J. Hof
Affiliation:
Institute for Systematics and Population Biology, University of Amsterdam, Post Box 94766, 1090 GT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Mazon Creek Cycloidea contain four taxa: Cyclus americanus Packard, 1885, Cyclus obesus, new species, Halicyne max, new species, and Apionicon apioides, new genus, new species. We conclude, based on a cladistic analysis, that cycloids are specialized maxillopodan crustaceans and a possible sister group to the Copepoda. They may have filled a niche similar to modernday crabs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , March 1997 , pp. 261 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abele, L.G., Kim, W., and Felgenhauer, B.E. 1989. Molecular evidence for inclusion of the phylum Pentastomida in the Crustacea. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 6:685–691.Google Scholar
Abele, L.G., Spears, T., Kim, W., and Applegate, M. 1992. Phylogeny of selected maxillopodan and other crustacean taxa based on 18S ribosomal nucleotide sequences: a preliminary analysis. Acta Zoologica, 73:373–382.Google Scholar
Bill, P.C. 1914. Über Crustaceen aus dem Voltziensandstein des Elsasses. Mitteilungen der geologischen Landesanstalt von Elsass-Lothringen, Strasbourg, Series 8, 3:289–338.Google Scholar
Boxshall, G.A. 1992. Synopsis of group discussion on the Maxillopoda. Co-chairmen: W. A. Newman and G. A. Boxshall. Acta Zoologica, 73:335–337.Google Scholar
Boxshall, G.A., and Huys, R. 1989. New tantulocarid, Stygotantulus stocki, parasitic on harpacticoid copepods, with an analysis of the phylogenetic relationships within the Maxillopoda. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 9:126–140.Google Scholar
Clark, N. D. L. 1989. A study of a Namurian crustacean-bearing shale from the western Midland Valley of Scotland. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, 341 p.Google Scholar
Dahl, E. 1956. Some crustacean relationships, p. 138–147. In Wingstrand, K.G. (ed.), Bertil Hangström, zoological papers in honour of his sixty-fifth birthday, November 20, 1956. Zoological Institute, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
Gall, J.-C. 1971. Faunes et paysages du grès à Voltzia du nord des Vosges. Essai paléoécologique sur le Buntsandstein Supérieur. Mémoires du Service de la Carte Géologique d'Alsace et de Lorraine, 34:1–318.Google Scholar
Gall, J.-C., and Grauvogel, L. 1967. Faune du Buntsandstein II.—les Halicynés. Annales de Paléontologie (Invertébrés), 53:1–14.Google Scholar
Gemmellaro, G. G. 1890. I crostacei dei Calcari con Fusulina della Valle del Fiume Socio nella Provincia di Palermo di Sicilia. Memorie della Societa Italiana di Scienze, Series 3, 8:1–40.Google Scholar
Gill, E. L. 1924. Fossil arthropods from Tyne coalfields. The Geological Magazine, Series 7, 1:466–471.Google Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1928. Zur Frage der ältesten fossilen Krabben. Centralblatt für Mineralogie, Geologie, und Paläontologie, Abteilung B, 6:388–398.Google Scholar
Glaessner, M.F. 1969. Cycloidea, p. R567–570. In Moore, R.C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part R, Arthropoda 4, Volume 2. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Goldring, R. 1967. Cyclus martinensis sp. nov. (Crustacea) from the Upper Viséan of the Mendip Hills, England. Palaeontology, 10:317–321.Google Scholar
Grygier, M. J. 1987. New records, external and internal anatomy, and systematic position of Hansen's y-larvae (Crustacea: Maxillopoda: Facetotecta). Sarsia, 72:261–278.Google Scholar
Hopwood, A. T. 1925. On the Family Cyclidae Packard. The Geological Magazine, 62:289–309.Google Scholar
Huys, R., and Boxshall, G. A. 1991. Copepod Evolution. The Ray Society, London, 468 p.Google Scholar
Huys, R., Boxshall, G. A., and Lincoln, R. J. 1993. The tantulocarid life cycle: The circle closed. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 13:432–442.Google Scholar
Koninck, L. de. 1841. Mémoire sur les Crustacés fossiles de Belgique. Mémoires de l'Académie Royale de Belgique, 14:1–20.Google Scholar
Koninck, L. de. 1842. Cycloides, B., p. 591–594. In Description des animaux fossiles qui se trouvent dans le terrain Carbonifère de Belgique, Liége, 139 p. Google Scholar
Kramarenko, N. N. 1961. Predstavitel Cyclidae (Crustacea) iz nizhnepermskikh otlozheniy Priuralya. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, 2:86–89. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Meyer, H. von. 1838. Mitteilungen, an Professor Bronn gerichtet. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie, und Paläontologie, 1838:413–418.Google Scholar
Meyer, H. von. 1844. “no title.” Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie, und Paläontologie, 1844:564–567.Google Scholar
Meyer, H. von. 1847. Halicyne und Litogaster, zwei Crustaceen-genera aus dem Muschelkalke Würtemberg's. Paläontographica, 1:134–140.Google Scholar
Meyer, H. von. 1851. Fische, Crustaceen, Echinodermen, und andere Versteinerungen aus dem Muschelkalk Oberschlesiens. Paläontographica, 1:216–279.Google Scholar
Müller, A. H. 1955. Über einen Neufund von Halicyne plana und die systematische Stellung von Halicyne (Crustacea?). Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 29:131–135.Google Scholar
Müller, K. J., and Walossek, D. 1988. External morphology and larval development of the Upper Cambrian maxillopod Bredocaris admirabilis . Fossils and Strata, 23:1–70.Google Scholar
Packard, A. S. 1872. The development of Limulus polyphemus . Memoirs of the Boston Society of Natural History, 1:155–202.Google Scholar
Packard, A. S. 1885. Types of Carboniferous Xiphosura new to North America. American Naturalist, 19:291–294.Google Scholar
Packard, A. S. 1886. On the Carboniferous xiphosurous fauna of North America. Memoires of the Academy of Sciences, 3:143–157, plates 5-7.Google Scholar
Park, T. S. 1966. The biology of a calanoid copepod, Epilabidocera amphitrites . Cellule, 66:129–251.Google Scholar
Parker, G. H. 1891. The compound eye of crustaceans. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 21:45–141.Google Scholar
Peach, B. N. 1883. Further researches among the Crustacea and Arachnida of the Carboniferous rocks of the Scottish border. Transactions of the Royal Society, Edinburgh, 30:511–528.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. 1835. Illustrations of the Geology of Yorkshire, 2nd edition. John Murray, London. i-xii, 184 p., 23 plates, 1 map.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C. 1893. Woodwardian Museum notes. The Geological Magazine, Series 3, 10:64–66.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C. 1908. A new species of Cyclus from the Carboniferous Limestone of Ireland. The Geological Magazine, Series 5, 5:551–552.Google Scholar
Rogers, A. F. 1902. Some new American species of Cyclus from the Coal Measures. Kansas University Science Bulletin, 1:269–275.Google Scholar
Schafhäutl, K.E. 1863. Süd-Bayerns Lethaea Geognostica. Der Kressenberg und die südlich von ihm gelegenen Hochalpen. Leopold Voss, Leipzig. i-xvi, 487 p., 98 plates.Google Scholar
Schauroth, C. von. 1854. Ein Beitrag zur Paläontologie des deutschen Zechsteingebirges. Zeitschrift der deutschen geologischen Gesellschaft, 6:560.Google Scholar
Schram, F.R. 1986. Crustacea. Oxford University Press, New York, 606 p.Google Scholar
Schram, F.R. and Hof, C. H. J. (in press) Fossils and the interrelationships of major crustacean groups. In Edgecombe, G. (ed.), Fossils and the Phylogeny of Arthropods. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.Google Scholar
Schram, F.R., Feldmann, R. M., and Copeland, M. J. 1978. The Late Devonian Palaeopalaemonidae and the earliest decapod crustaceans. Journal of Paleontology, 52:1375–1387.Google Scholar
Schram, F.R., and Mapes, R. 1984. Imocaris tuberculata, n. gen., new species, (Crustacea: Decapoda) from the Upper Mississippian Imo Formation, Arkansas. Transactions of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 20:165–168.Google Scholar
Seebach, K. von. 1857. Entomostraceen aus der Trias Thüringens. Zeitschrift der deutschen geologischen Gesellschaft, 9:198–206.Google Scholar
Stolley, E. 1915. Über einige Brachyuren aus der Trias und dem Dogger der Alpen. Jahrbuch der Kaiserlich-Königlichen geologischen Reichsanstalt, 64:675–682.Google Scholar
Trauth, F. 1918. Über einige Krustazeenreste aus der alpin-mediterranen Trias. Kaiserliches und Königliches Naturhistorisches Hofmuseum Wien, Annalen, 32:172–192.Google Scholar
Trümpy, R. 1957. Ein Fund von Halicyne (Crustacea incertae sedis) im mittleren Muschelkalk des Wutachtales. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 50:544–553.Google Scholar
Walossek, D. and Müller, K.J. Pentastomid parasites from the Lower Palaeozoic of Sweden. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 85:1–37.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. 1868. Fourth report on fossil Crustacea. British Association Reports, Norwich Meeting, 1868:72–75.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. 1870. Contributions to British fossil Crustacea. The Geological Magazine, 7:554–560.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. 1893. Note on a new British species of Cyclus from the Coal Measures of Racup, Lancashire. The Geological Magazine, Series 3, 10:28–29.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. 1894. Contributions to our knowledge of the genus Cyclus from the Carboniferous formation of various British localities. The Geological Magazine, Series 4, 1:530–539.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. 1905. Further notes on Cyclus johnsoni, from the Coal Measures near Dudley. The Geological Magazine, series 5, 2:490–492.Google Scholar