^{page 703 note 1} Throughout this critique, ‘political violence’ has been used as a meta-concept – a comprehensive, generic type of concept.

^{page 703 note 2} Cnudde, C. H., ‘Theories of Political Development and the Assumptions of Statistical Models: an evaluation of two models’, in Comparative Political Studies (Beverly Hills), v, 1972, pp. 131–50.Google Scholar

^{page 703 note 3} Gurr, R. T., ‘Psychological Factors in Civil Violence’, in World Politics (Princeton), xx, 1968, pp. 245–78;Google Scholar and Rosenbaum, H. J. and Sederberg, P. C., ‘Vigilantism: an analysis of establishment violence’, in Comparative Politics (New York), VI, 1974, pp. 541–70.Google Scholar

^{page 703 note 4} Zolberg, A. R., ‘The Structure of Political Conflict in the New States of Tropical Africa’, in The American Political Science Review (Menasha), 62, 1968, pp. 70–87.Google Scholar

^{page 703 note 5} D. G. Morrison and H. M. Stevenson, ‘Integration and Instability: patterns of African political development’, in ibid. 66, 1972, pp. 902–27.

^{page 703 note 6} Nardin, T., Violence and the State: a critique of empirical political theory (Beverly Hills, 1971), p. 12.Google Scholar

^{page 704 note 1} Ibid. p. 62.

^{page 704 note 2} Kesselman, Mark, ‘Order or Movement? The Literature of Political Development as Ideology’, in World Politics, 26, 1973, p. 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 704 note 3} Nardin, op. cit. p. 59.

^{page 704 note 4} Bergman, G., The Philosophy of Science (Madison, 1957), p. 50.Google Scholar

^{page 705 note 1} Gurr, loc. cit. pp. 253–4.

^{page 705 note 2} Nardin, op. cit.

^{page 705 note 3} Tilly, Charles, ‘Does Modernisation Breed Revolution?’, in Comparative Politics, V, 1973, pp. 425–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 705 note 4} Rosenbaum and Sederberg, loc. cit. pp. 541–2.

^{page 706 note 1} Nieburg, H. L., Political Violence (New York, 1969), p. 41.Google Scholar

^{page 706 note 2} Wolfenstein, E. V., The Revolutionary Personality: Lenin, Trotsky, Gandhi (Princeton, 1967).Google Scholar

^{page 706 note 3} Erikson, E. H., Childhood and Society (New York, 1963 edn.).Google Scholar

^{page 706 note 4} Morrison and Stevenson, loc. cit. p. 903.

^{page 707 note 1} P.Flora, ‘Historical Processes of Social Mobilisation: urbanisation and literacy, 1850–1965’, in Eisenstadt, S. N. and Rokkan, Stein (eds.), Building States and Nations: models and data resources (Beverly Hills, 1973).Google Scholar

^{page 707 note 2} Zolberg, loc. cit. p. 77.

^{page 707 note 3} Ibid. pp. 77–8.

^{page 707 note 4} See Easton, David, A Framework for Political Analysis: a systems analysis of political life (Englewood Cliffs, 1965),Google Scholar passim.

^{page 708 note 1} Zolberg, loc. cit. p. 75.

^{page 708 note 2} Welch, Claude E., ‘Personalism and Corporatism in African Armies’, in Kelleher, C. M. (ed.), Political-Military Systems: comparative perspectives (Beverly Hills, 1974), p. 127.Google Scholar

^{page 708 note 3} Putnam, R. D., ‘Toward Explaining Military Intervention in Latin American Politics’, in World Politics, 20, 1967, pp. 83–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 708 note 4} McKown, R. E., ‘Domestic Correlates of Military Intervention in African Politics’, in Journal of Political and Mlilitary Sociology (De Kalb, Ill.), III, 1975, p. 594.Google Scholar

^{page 708 note 5} Zolberg, loc. cit. p. 86.

^{page 709 note 1} Flora, loc. cit. and W. Zapf and P. Flora, ‘Differences in Paths of Development: an analysis for ten countries’, in Eisenstadt and Rokkan (eds), op. cit.

^{page 709 note 2} Blabock, H. M., Theory Construction from verbal to mathematical formulations (Englewood Cliffs, 1969).Google Scholar