Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-72csx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T07:17:17.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Power-sharing as a fragile safety valve in times of electoral turmoil: the costs and benefits of Burundi's 2010 elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2011

Stef Vandeginste*
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Fellow, Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO), Faculty of Law, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium

Abstract

This paper analyses the local, presidential and legislative elections that took place in Burundi between May and September 2010. Electoral results are presented, analysed and interpreted against the background of Burundi's constitutional consociational power-sharing regime. The power-sharing arrangement, which was negotiated during Burundi's recently completed peace process, saved the pluralistic nature of the elections but may itself fall victim to the outcome of these same elections, with the dominant party CNDD-FDD obtaining an overwhelming majority in parliament and controlling most of the instruments needed to further establish its hegemony. Political pluralism, both within and outside the institutions, is under threat. As evidenced by developments in the early aftermath of the electoral marathon, conjunctural alliances between opposition groups and the incumbent regime's increasingly authoritarian response to dissidence may well result in renewed instability and insecurity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

ADC-Ikibiri. 2010. Mémorandum sur les irrégularités et fraudes massives des élections communales du 24 mai 2010. Bujumbura.Google Scholar
Amnesty International (AI). 2010. A Step Backwards: torture and other ill-treatment by Burundi's National Intelligence Service. London: AI.Google Scholar
Bogaards, M. 2008. ‘Comparative strategies of political party regulation’, in Reilly, B. & Nordlund, P., eds. Political Parties in Conflict-Prone Societies: regulation, engineering and democratic development. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 4866.Google Scholar
De Waal, A. 2009. ‘Mission without end? Peacekeeping in the African political marketplace’, International Affairs 85, 1: 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlay, A. 2010. Governing Ethnic Conflict: consociation, identity and the price of peace. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch (HRW). 2010. ‘We'll Tie You up and Shoot You': lack of accountability for political violence in Burundi. New York: HRW.Google Scholar
Jarstad, A. 2008. ‘Power sharing: former enemies in joint government’, in Jarstad, A. & Sisk, T., eds. From War to Democracy: dilemmas of peacebuilding. Cambridge University Press, 105–33.Google Scholar
Lemarchand, R. 2007. ‘Consociationalism and power sharing in Africa: Rwanda, Burundi and the Democratic Republic of the Congo’, African Affairs 106, 422: 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A. 2008. Thinking about Democracy: power sharing and majority rule in theory and practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lindberg, S. 2006. Democracy and Elections in Africa. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lindberg, S., ed. 2009. Democratization by Elections: a new mode of transition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Nimubona, J. 2005. La Perception de l'Identité Ethnique dans le Processus Électoral au Burundi. Bujumbura: LDGL.Google Scholar
Ntibantunganya, S. 1999. Une Démocratie pour Tous les Burundais. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. 2006. ‘A beacon for Central Africa’, Journal of Democracy 17, 1: 125–31.Google Scholar
Reilly, B. 2008. ‘Post-war elections: uncertain turning points of transition’, in Jarstad, A. & Sisk, T., eds. From War to Democracy: dilemmas of peacebuilding. Cambridge University Press, 157–81.Google Scholar
Reyntjens, F. 1993. ‘The proof of the pudding is in the eating: the June 1993 elections in Burundi’, Journal of Modern African Studies 31, 4: 563–83.Google Scholar
Schedler, A. 2010. ‘Authoritarianism's last line of defense’, Journal of Democracy 21, 1: 6980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, D. 2005. ‘The missing pillars: a look at the failure of peace in Burundi through the lens of Arend Lijphart's theory of consociational democracy’, Journal of Modern African Studies 43, 1: 7595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, R. 2009. ‘The promise of consociational theory’, in Taylor, R., ed. Consociational Theory: McGarry & O'Leary and the Northern Ireland Conflict. New York: Routledge, 111.Google Scholar
Tull, D. & Mehler, A.. 2005. ‘The hidden costs of power-sharing: reproducing insurgent violence in Africa’, African Affairs 104, 416: 375–98.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council (UNSC). 2010a. Seventh Report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Integrated Office in Burundi (S/2010/608, 30.11.2010).Google Scholar
UNSC. 2010b. Letter Dated 15 November 2010 from the Chair of the Security Council Committee Established Pursuant to Resolution 1533(2004) concerning the Democratic Republic of the Congo Addressed to the President of the Security Council (S/2010/596, 29.11.2010).Google Scholar
UNSC. 2010c. Resolution 1959 (2010) on Burundi (16.12.2010).Google Scholar
UNSC. 2010d. Security Council Press Statement on Burundi (SC/9959, 23.6.2010).Google Scholar
Vandeginste, S. 2009. ‘Power-sharing, conflict and transition in Burundi: twenty years of trial and error’, Africa Spectrum 44, 3: 6386.Google Scholar
Vandeginste, S. 2010. Stones Left Unturned: law and transitional justice in Burundi. Antwerp: Intersentia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Walle, N. 2003. ‘Presidentialism and clientelism in Africa's emerging party systems’, Journal of Modern African Studies 41, 2: 297321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar