Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T00:21:00.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Military Burden in Developing Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Extract

During the 1970s, African arms imports rose faster than in any other region of the world. Indeed, military spending doubled between 1970 and 1977, albeit falling since that peak by about one-quarter by 1982,1 as may be seen in Figure 1. The expansion by developing countries of their armed forces during the 1970s, which was certainly not confined to Africa, stimulated interest among economists regarding its impact on economic growth. Our article attempts a quantitative assessment of some of the moew important factors which influence levels of military expenditures in developing countries, first in general and then in Africa specifically, by means of cross-country multiple regression analysis for the average of the years 1978–80. Although military spending is often an end in itself, providing a living for the soldiers and their suppliers, it is also justified on the grounds that it deters armed conflict or domestic unrest, despite being responsible for so many coups d'état.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Page 377 note 1 Luckham, Robin, ‘Militarization in Africa’, in Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, SIPRI Yearbook, 1985 (London and Philadelphia, 1985).Google Scholar

Page 377 note 2 Benoit, Emile, Defence and Economic Growth in Developing Countries (Boston, 1973).Google Scholar

Page 378 note 1 Source: SIPRI Yearbook, 1985, table 9.1. North Africa includes Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, and Tunisia; sub-Saharan Africa includes all other African countries, including South Africa.

Page 378 note 2 Ball, Nicole, ‘Defence and Development: a critique of the Benoit study’, in Economic Development and Cultural Change (Chicago), 31, 3, 1983, pp. 507–24.Google Scholar

Page 378 note 3 Benoit, Emile, ‘Growth and Defence in Developing Countries’,Google Scholar in ibid. 26, 2, 1978, pp. 271–80.

Page 379 note 1 Deger, Saadat, ‘Human Resources, Government Education Expenditure and the Military Burden in Less Developed Countries’, Birkbeck College, London, 1981, Discussion Paper No. 109.Google Scholar

Page 379 note 2 Deger, Saadat, ‘Does Defence Expenditure Mobilise Resources in LDCs?’, Annual Conference of Development Studies Association, Dublin, 1982.Google Scholar

Page 379 note 3 Nabe, Oumar, ‘Military Expenditures and Industrialization in Africa’, in Journal of Economic Issues (Lincoln, Nebraska), XVII, 2, 1983, pp. 575–87.Google Scholar

Page 380 note 1 Ball, ‘Defence and Development’.

Page 380 note 2 See Smith, Ronald, ‘Military Expenditure and Capitalism’, in Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1, 1, 1977, pp. 6176,CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Military Expenditure and Investment in OECD Countries, 1954–1973, in Journal of Comparative Economics (New York), IV, 1, 1980, pp. 1932;Google ScholarDeger, , ‘Human Resources, Government Education Expenditure and the Military Burden’ and ‘Does Defence Expenditure Mobilise Resources in LDCs?’;Google ScholarDeger, Saadat and Sen, Somnath, ‘Military Expenditure, Spin-off and Economic Development’, in Journal of Development Economics (Amsterdam), 13, 1983, pp. 6784;Google ScholarDeger, Saadat and Smith, Ron, ‘Military Expenditure and Growth in Less Developed Countries’, in Journal of Conflict Resolution (Beverly Hills), II, 2, 1983, pp. 335–54;Google ScholarFaini, Riccardo, Annez, Patricia, and Taylor, Lance, ‘Defence Spending, Economic Structure and Growth: evidence among countries over time’, in Economic Development and Cultural Change, 32, 3, 1984, pp. 487–98;CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Lim, David, ‘Another Look at Growth and Defence in Less Developed Countries’,Google Scholar in ibid. 31, 2, 1983, pp. 377–84.

Page 380 note 3 Source: Maizels, Alfred and Nissanke, M. K., ‘The Determinants of Military Expenditures in Developing Countries’, in World Development (Oxford), 14, 1986, pp. 1125–40.Google Scholar

Page 381 note 1 A clear statement of the traditional answers to this question can be found in Akinyemi, A. Bolaji et al. , ‘Disarmament and Development: utilization of resources for military purposes in black Africa’, Nigerian Institute of International Affairs, Lagos, 1979, prepared for the United Nations.Google Scholar

Page 381 note 2 Sivard, R. L., World Military and Social Expenditures, 1985, (Washington, D.C., 1985), p. 24.Google Scholar According to SIPRI Yearbook, 1985, ch. 9, 23 régimes were of military origin, with a further three being impossible to identify as either military or civilian.Google Scholar

Page 382 note 1 SIPRI Yearbook, 1985, table 10.4.

Page 383 note 1 SIPRI Yearbook, 1985, table 7A5.

Page 383 note 2 Sunkel, Osvaldo, ‘Transnational Capitalism and National Disintegration in Latin America’, in Social and Economic Studies (Kingston, Jamaica), 22, 1973, pp. 132–76;Google Scholar and Palma, Gabriel, ‘Dependency: a formal theory of underdevelopment or a methodology for the analysis of concrete situations of underdevelopment?’, in World Development, 6, 1978, pp. 881924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page 383 note 3 Frank, Isaiah, Foreign Enterprise in Development Countries (Baltimore, 1980).Google Scholar

Page 385 note 1 Based on Sivard, R. L., World Military and Social Expenditures, 1983 (Washington, D.C., 1983). This source gives information on the ‘official use of violence against the public’ only for military régimes. Sivard, op. cit. 1985, gives this information for both military and other régimes, but 1985 is too remote from the period 1978–1980 for this more complete information to be used in our regressions. For instance, the number of countries in our African sample of 38, which Sivard classifies as being under military rule, rose from 19 in 1983 to 23 in 1985.Google Scholar

Page 385 note 2 Sivard, op. cit. 1983, p. 11.

Page 386 note 1 Ball, Nicole, ‘Measuring Third World Security Expenditure: a research note’, in World Development, 12, 2, 1984, pp. 157164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page 387 note 1 United Nations, A System of National Accounts (New York, 1968), para. 5.117e.Google Scholar

Page 389 note 1 Source: Maizels, and Nissanke, , loc. cit. tables 3, 4, and 5.Google Scholar

Page 392 note 1 Lewis Fry Richardson introduced this method, but his threshold was 315 deaths; Statistics of Deadly Quarrels (Pittsburgh, 1960), ch. II.Google Scholar

Page 395 note 1 Johnson, Thomas H., Slater, Robert O., and McGowan, Pat, ‘Explaining African Military Coups d'État, 1960–1982’, in The American Political Science Review (Washington, D.C.), 78, 3, 09, pp. 622–40.Google Scholar

Page 395 note 2 Decalo, Samuel, Coups and Army Rule in Africa: studies in military style (New Haven and London, 1976).Google Scholar

Page 395 note 3 Cf.Huntington, Samuel P., The Soldier and the State (New York, 1964).Google Scholar

Page 395 note 4 Mazrui, Ali A., ‘The Resurrection of the Warrior Tradition in African Political Culture’, in The Journal of Modern African Studies, 13, 1, 03 1975, pp. 6784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page 395 note 5 Auma-Osolo, Agola, ‘Objective African Military Control: a new paradigm in civil-military relations’, in Journal of Peace Research (Oslo), XVII, 1, 1980, pp. 2946.Google Scholar

Page 397 note 1 Cf.Kirk-Greene, A. H. M., ‘Stay By Your Radios’: documentation for a study of military government in tropical Africa (Leiden and Cambridge, 1981).Google Scholar

Page 398 note 1 Doumenge, François, Enclavement et développement (Paris, 1986).Google Scholar

Page 400 note 1 Dommen, Edward, ‘Some Distinguishing Characteristics of Island States’, in World Development, 8, 12, 1980, pp. 931–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page 400 note 2 Terrell, L. M., ‘Societal Stress, Political Instability and Levels of Military Effort’, in Journal of Conflict Resolution, xv, 3, 1971, pp. 329–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar