Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:36:36.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ultramicrotomy: A unique method for preparation of composite solder for transmission electron microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2016

Elizabeth G. Jacobs ,
L. Ann Foster Yujing Wu ,
Angela R. Wilson  and
Russell F. Pinizzotto
Elizabeth G. Jacobs
Affiliation:
Center for Materials Characterization, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas 76203-5308
L. Ann Foster Yujing Wu
Affiliation:
Center for Materials Characterization, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas 76203-5308
Angela R. Wilson
Affiliation:
Center for Materials Characterization, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas 76203-5308
Russell F. Pinizzotto
Affiliation:
Center for Materials Characterization, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas 76203-5308
Get access

Extract

Ultramicrotomy was successfully implemented for sectioning solder/Cu and composite solder/Cu samples for TEM. Solder/Cu joints, approximately 10 mm by 2 mm by 3 mm, were carbon coated and dipped in cyanoacrylate ester before being embedded into an epoxy mount. The mounted samples were trimmed in a series of steps to obtain a pyramid-shaped, embedded sample with a flat, trapezoidal face of exposed metal for sectioning. Thin sections were sliced directly from the bulk sample using an ultramicrotome and a diamond knife. Once sectioned, the samples were placed on Formvar and carbon coated copper grids for examination by TEM. Solder/Cu joints made with eutectic (63Sn/37Pb) solder and several composite solders, including Cu, Ni, and Cu6Sn5, were examined. For the first time, it was possible to image simultaneously each phase in the material using a single TEM sample. The various phases present in the solder joints, including the Pb-rich and Sn-rich solder phases, the Cu6Sn5 and Cu3Sn intermetallic phases, and Cu were identified using selected area electron diffraction. Artifacts due to sectioning, such as knife marks, intermetallic tearing, and brittle phase extraction, were observed. These artifacts were minimized by controlling the sectioning conditions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 87 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Pinizzotto, R.F., Wu, Y., Jacobs, E.G., and Foster, L.A., in Tech. Proceedings of NEPCON WEST ’92 3 (Cahners, Des Plaines IL 1992), pp. 1284–1298.Google Scholar
2. Lucey, G., Marshall, J.L., Handwerker, C., Tench, D., and Sunwoo, A., in Tech. Proceedings of NEPCON WEST ’91 1 (Cahners, Des Plaines, IL, 1991), pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
3. Frear, D. R., Ph.D. Thesis, University of California at Berkeley 1987.Google Scholar
4. Dirnfield, S.F. and Ramon, J.J., Weld, J., October, 373s-377s (1990).Google Scholar
5. Dawes, C. J., Biological Techniques for Transmission and Scanning Electron Microscopy (Ladd Research Industries, Inc., Burlington, VT, 1979), p. 133.Google Scholar
6. Malis, T. F. and Steele, D., in Specimen Preparation for Transmission Electron Microscopy of Materials II, edited by Anderson, R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 199, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990) pp. 3–42.Google Scholar
7. International Electronic Materials Corporation, 30275 Bainbridge Road, Cleveland, OH 44139.Google Scholar
8. Aesar, Inc., 30 Bond Street, Ward Hill, MA 01835.Google Scholar
9. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.Google Scholar
10. JEOL SVC, JEOL Engineering Service Company, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
11. Duro Loctite Corp., Cleveland, OH 44128.Google Scholar
12. Ted Pella, Inc., 4595 Mountain Lakes Blvd., Redding, CA 96003.Google Scholar
13. Eponate 812 Kit, Ted Pella, Inc., ibid. Google Scholar
14. Electron Microscopy Supplies, 321 Morris Road, Fort Washington, PA 19034.Google Scholar
15. Fullam, E.F., 900 Albany Shaker Road, Latham, NY 12110.Google Scholar
16. Elemental and Interplanar Spacing Index (U.S. Department of Commerce, NIST, and JCPDS International Center for Diffraction Data, 1989).Google Scholar
17. Wu, Y., Jacobs, E. G., and Pinizzotto, R. F., unpublished research.Google Scholar
18. Malis, T. and Steele, D., in Specimen Preparation for Transmission Electron Microscopy of Materials III, edited by Anderson, R., Tracy, B., and Bravman, J. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 254, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992), pp. 257–270.Google Scholar
19. Popoola, O. O., Cooper, J. J., Jakstys, B. P., and Kriven, W. M., ibid., pp. 271–278.Google Scholar