Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T23:59:15.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Synthesis of solid and spirally cracked TiO2 fibers by a liquid mix process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Chen-Lung Fan
Affiliation:
Ceramic Engineering Department, University of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla, Missouri 65401
Daniel Ciardullo
Affiliation:
Ceramic Engineering Department, University of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla, Missouri 65401
Wayne Huebner
Affiliation:
Ceramic Engineering Department, University of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla, Missouri 65401
Get access

Abstract

Titania fibers were synthesized by a liquid mix process, starting by complexing titanium isopropoxide with a chelating agent solution to form a precursor resin for further fiber drawing. The as-drawn continuous precursor fibers underwent a weight change of 80% and a volume change of 75% after heat treatment at 800 °C in nitrogen followed by an additional treatment at 600 °C in air. The fibers consisted mainly of rutile with 5–10% anatase. Further treatment at 700 °C transformed the anatase completely into rutile. Fibers with finished diameter less than about 15 μm were solid with smooth surfaces. Fibers with finished diameter greater than about 15 μm were hollow and spirally cracked in a uniform manner. Fibers treated at 600 °C showed no visible grains. Additional annealing at 800 °C grew grains to an average size of 0.3–0.4 μm. The fibers appeared solid and dense.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Bunsell, A.R. and Berger, M.H., Comp. Sci. Technol. 51, 127 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Ishikawa, T., Comp. Sci. Technol. 51, 135 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Lipowitz, J., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 70, 1888 (1991).Google Scholar
4.Wallenberger, F.T., Nordine, P.C., and Boman, M., Comp. Sci. Technol. 51, 193 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Wallenberger, F.T. and Brown, S.D., Comp. Sci. Technol. 51, 243 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Hennings, D. and Mayr, W., J. Solid State Chem. 26, 329 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Laine, R.M. and Youngdahl, K.A., J. Mater. Res. 6, 895 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Bunsell, A.R., J. Appl. Polym. Sci., Appl. Polym. Symp. 47, 87 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Yajima, S., Hasegawa, X., Hayashi, J., and Iimua, M., J. Mater. Sci. 13, 2569 (1978).Google Scholar
10.Tucker, D.S., Sparks, J.S., and Esker, D.C., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 69, 1971 (1990).Google Scholar
11.Aoki, S-I., Choi, S.C., Payne, D.A., and Yanagida, H., Better Ceramics Through Chemistry IV, edited by Brinker, C.J., Zelinski, B.J.J., Clark, D.F., and Ulrich, D.R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 180, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990), pp. 485490.Google Scholar
12.Zhang, S.C., Messing, G.L., and Borden, M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 61 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Messing, G.L., Zhang, S.C., and Jayanthi, G.V., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76, 2707 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Card, R.J. and O’Toole, M.P., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 665 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Cass, R.B., Am Ceram. Soc. Bull. 70, 424 (1991).Google Scholar
16.Zhang, S.C., Messing, G.L., Huebner, W., and Coleman, M.M., J. Mater. Res. 5, 1806 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Aswar, A.S. and Bhave, N.S., Polymer Degradation and Stability 31, 115 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Vries, R.C. and Roy, R., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 33, 370 (1954).Google Scholar
19.Osborn, E.F., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 36, 149 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar