Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T00:52:26.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Substrate temperature dependence of structure and resistivity of SrRuO3 thin films grown by pulsed laser deposition on (100) SrTiO3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

N. D. Zakharov ,
K. M. Satyalakshmi ,
G. Koren  and
D. Hesse
N. D. Zakharov
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Mikrostrukturphysik, Weinberg 2, D-06120 Halle, Germany
K. M. Satyalakshmi
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Mikrostrukturphysik, Weinberg 2, D-06120 Halle, Germany, and Department of Physics, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
G. Koren
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
D. Hesse
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Mikrostrukturphysik, Weinberg 2, D-06120 Halle, Germany
Get access

Abstract

The resistivity of SrRuO3 thin films on (001) SrTiO3 substrates grown at different temperatures by pulsed laser deposition is correlated to the microstructure. Films grown at 775 °C are of an orthorhombic structure, contain very few defects, and exhibit a low resistivity of 150 μΩ cm. Films grown at other temperatures contain a cubic phase and show higher resistivities. The defects present in the films, particularly twins and antiphase boundaries, are analyzed by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, and their origin, as well as influence on film resistivity, is discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 14 , Issue 11 , November 1999 , pp. 4385 - 4394
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Eom, C.B., Cava, R.J., Fleming, R.M., Phillips, J.M., Van Dover, R.B., Marshall, J.H., Hsu, J.W.P, Krajewski, J.J., and Peck, W.F., Science 258, 1766 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Hiratani, M., Okazaki, C., Imagawa, K., and Takagi, K., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 35, 6212 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Gan, Q., Rao, R.A., and Eom, C.B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 1962 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Jiang, J.C., Pan, X.Q., and Chen, C.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 909 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Jia, Q.X., Chu, F., Adams, C.D., Wu, X.D., Hawley, M., Cho, J.H., Findikoglu, A.T., Foltyn, S.R., Smith, J.L., and Mitchell, T.E., J. Mater. Res. 11, 2263 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Jia, Q.X., Foltyn, S.R., Hawley, M., and Wu, X.D., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A15, 1080 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Chen, C.L., Cao, Y., Huang, Z.J., Zhang, Z., Sun, Y.Y., Kang, W.N., Dezaneti, L.M., Chu, W.K., and Chu, C.W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 1047 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Jiang, J.C., Pan, X., and Chen, C.L., in Ferroelectric Thin Films VI, edited by Treece, R.E., Jones, R.E., Forster, C.M., Desu, S.B., and Yoo, J.K. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 493, Pittsburgh, PA, 1998), p. 195.Google Scholar
9.Maria, J-P., Trolier-McKinstry, S., Schlom, D.G., Hawley, M.E., and Brown, G.W., J. Appl. Phys. 83, 4373 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Lu, P., Chu, F., Jia, Q.X., and Mitchell, T.E., J. Mater. Res. 13, 2302 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Jiang, J.C., Tian, W., Pan, X.Q., Gan, Q., and Eom, C.B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 2963 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Træholt, C., Wen, J.G., Svetchnikov, V., Delsing, A., and Zandbergen, H.W., Physica C206, 318 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Kilaas, R., in Proceedings of the 45th Annual EMSA Meeting, edited by Bailey, G.W. (San Francisco Press, San Francisco, CA, 1987), p. 66.Google Scholar
14.Jones, C.W., Battle, P.D., Lightfoot, P., and Harrison, T.A., Acta Crystallogr. C45, 365 (1989).Google Scholar
15.Eysel, W. and Geyer, A. (1992), cited after JCPDS File No. 43–0472, International Centre for Diffraction Data (1995).Google Scholar
16.Bensch, W., Schmalle, H.W., and Reller, A., Solid State Ionics 43, 171 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Kikuchi, Y., Watanabe, K., Naitoh, S., Hiratsuka, K., and Yamaguchi, H., Phys. Status Solidi A 108, 509 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Zakharov, N.D., Gribelyuk, M.A., Vainstein, B.K., Kovba, L.M., and Horiuchi, S., Acta Crystallogr. A44, 821 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Oku, T., Carlsson, L.A., Wallenberg, L.R., Malm, J-O., Bovin, J-O., Higashi, I., Tanaka, T., and Ishizawa, Y., J. Solid State Chem. 135, 182 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Zakharov, N.D., Kästner, G., Hesse, D., and Lorenz, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 1151 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Dai, Z.R. and Ohuchi, F.S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 966 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Randall, J. and Ward, R., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 81, 2629 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Eibl, O., Pongratz, P., Skalicky, P., and Schmelz, H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 70, 195 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Oppolzer, C-H. and Schmelz, H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 66, 44 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Kästner, G., Wagner, R., Lacayo, G., and Hilarius, V., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 8, 802 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Recnik, A., Bruley, J., Mader, W., Kolar, D., and Rühle, M., Philos. Mag. B70, 1021 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Jesson, D.E., Chen, K.M., and Pennycook, S.J., MRS Bull. 21(4), 31 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Fahley, K.P., Clemens, B.M., and Wills, L.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 2480 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar