Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:46:37.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Study of orientation relationship between Al matrix and several typical inclusions in Al alloy by edge-to-edge matching model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2017

Yu Liu ,
Yuanchun Huang  and
Zhengbing Xiao
Yu Liu
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Light Alloy, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China; and Nouferrous Metal Oriented Advanced Structural Materials and Manufacturing Cooperative Innovation Center, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Yuanchun Huang*
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Light Alloy, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China; College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China; and Nouferrous Metal Oriented Advanced Structural Materials and Manufacturing Cooperative Innovation Center, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Zhengbing Xiao
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Light Alloy, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China; College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China; and Nouferrous Metal Oriented Advanced Structural Materials and Manufacturing Cooperative Innovation Center, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: science@csu.edu.cn
Get access

Abstract

The orientation relationship (OR) between Al matrix and several typical inclusions, Al2O3, MgO, AlN, TiB2, and AlB2, in Al alloy have been studied by edge-to-edge matching model and refined with Δg theory. Based on the calculation of interatomic spacing misfit and interplanar spacing misfit, the number of ORs between Al and Al2O3, MgO, AlN, TiB2, AlB2 were predicted to be 1, 7, 2, 2, and 2, respectively. The result reveals that the wettability of Al to the studied inclusions could rank as MgO, AlB2, TiB2, AlN, Al2O3 in the order of decreasing, and the removability of those particles from aluminum melt rank in an opposite way from the perspectives of crystallography features of interfacial energy. Moreover, Al2O3 have a higher sensitivity to the performance of a processed aluminum alloy component than other inclusions, and MgO has the minimal impact, when the studied inclusions were residual in aluminum alloy.

Keywords

aluminum alloyinclusionsorientation relationshipedge-to-edge matching modelremovability
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 32 , Issue 11 , 14 June 2017 , pp. 2092 - 2099
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Contributing Editor: Jürgen Eckert

References

REFERENCES

Zhang, X., Liu, W., Liu, S., and Zhou, M.: Effect of processing parameters on quench sensitivity of an AA7050 sheet. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528(3), 795–802 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, X., McDonald, S.D., Dahle, A.K., Davidson, C.J., and StJohn, D.H.: Modeling of grain refinement: Part III. Al–7 Si–0.3 Mg aluminum alloy. J. Mater. Res. 23(5), 1301–1306 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, W., Ji, S., Wang, M., and Li, Z.: Precipitation behaviour of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy and diffraction analysis from η′ precipitates in four variants. J. Alloys Compd. 610, 623–629 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, L-M., Wang, W-H., Hsu, Y-F., and Trong, S.: Effects of homogenization treatment on recrystallization behavior and dispersoid distribution in an Al–Zn–Mg–Sc–Zr alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 456(1–2), 163–169 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Soudani, S.M. and Pelloux, R.M.: A comparative analysis of automated and manual measurements of volume fraction of inclusions in aluminum-alloy rolled sheets. Metallography 6(1), 37–64 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirgaux, O., Ablitzer, D., Waz, E., and Bellot, J.P.: Mathematical modeling, and computer simulation: Of molten aluminum purification by flotation in stirred reactor. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 40(3), 363–375 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L., Aoki, J., and Thomas, B.G.: Inclusion removal by bubble flotation in a continuous casting mold. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 37(3), 361–379 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, H., Jian, X., Meek, T.T., and Han, Q.: Degassing of molten aluminum A356 alloy using ultrasonic vibration. Mater. Lett. 58(29), 3669–3673 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahverdi, H.R., Ghomashchi, M.R., Shabestari, S., and Hejazi, J.: Microstructural analysis of interfacial reaction between molten aluminium and solid iron. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 124(3), 345–352 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Q. and Reynolds, W.T.: Determining interphase boundary orientations from near-coincidence sites. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 29(8), 2059–2072 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forwood, C.T. and Lawn, B.R.: Plastic deformation patterns on cleavage surfaces of lithium fluoride. Philos. Mag. 13(123), 595–602 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiflet, G.J. and Merwe, J.H.: The role of structural ledges as misfit-compensating defects: fcc–bcc interphase boundaries. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 25(9), 1895–1903 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, K.C., Hall, M.G., Kinsman, K.R., and Aaronson, H.I.: The nature of the barrier to growth at partially coherent FCC: BCC boundaries. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 5(6), 1503–1505 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigsbee, J.M. and Aaronson, H.I.: A computer modeling study of partially coherent f.c.c.:b.c.c. boundaries. Acta Metall. 27(3), 351–363 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherly, G.C. and Zhang, W.Z.: The invariant line and precipitate morphology in Fcc–Bcc systems. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 25(9), 1865–1874 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, C.P., Dahmen, U., and Westmacott, K.H.: Morphology and crystallography of Cr precipitates in a Cu–0.33 wt% Cr alloy. Acta Metall. Mater. 42(6), 1923 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, C.P. and Dahmen, U.: Interface structure of faceted lath-shaped Cr precipitates in a Cu–0.33 wt% Cr alloy. Acta Mater. 46(6), 2063–2081 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujii, T., Mori, T., and Kato, M.: Crystallography and morphology of needle-like α-Fe precipitate particles in a Cu matrix. Acta Metall. Mater. 40(12), 3413–3420 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahmen, U.: The role of the invariant line in the search for an optimum interphase boundary by O-lattice theory. Scr. Metall. 15(1), 77–81 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahmen, U.: A comparison between three simple crystallographic principles of precipitate morphology. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 25(9), 1857–1863 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahmen, U.: Orientation relationships in precipitation systems. Acta Metall. 30(1), 63–73 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonda, R.W. and Shiflet, G.J.: Analysis of the Cu-3 Wt pct Ti cellular interphase boundary by various models. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 33(8), 2495–2505 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W.-Z. and Purdy, G.R.: O-lattice analyses of interfacial misfit. II. Systems containing invariant lines. Philos. Mag. A 68(2), 291–303 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, X.F. and Zhang, W.Z.: Analytical O-line solutions to phase transformation crystallography in fcc/bcc systems. Philos. Mag. 90(34), 4503–4527 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W.Z. and Weatherly, G.C.: On the crystallography of precipitation. Prog. Mater. Sci. 50(2), 181–292 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M.X. and Kelly, P.M.: Edge-to-edge matching and its applications part I. Application to the simple HCP/BCC system. Acta Mater. 53(4), 1073–1084 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, P.M. and Zhang, M.X.: Edge-to-edge matching—the fundamentals. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 37(3), 833–839 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M.-X. and Kelly, P.: Edge-to-edge matching and its applications: Part II. Application to Mg–Al, Mg–Y and Mg–Mn alloys. Acta Mater. 53(4), 1085–1096 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M.-X. and Kelly, P.: Edge-to-edge matching model for predicting orientation relationships and habit planes—the improvements. Scr. Mater. 52(10), 963–968 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M.X. and Kelly, P.M.: Edge-to-edge matching model for predicting orientation relationships and habit planes-the improvements. Scr. Mater. 52(10), 963–968 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M.X. and Kelly, P.M.: Edge-to-edge matching and its applications part II. Application to Mg–Al, Mg–Y and Mg–Mn alloys. Acta Mater. 53(4), 1085–1096 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, P. and Zhang, M.: Comments on edge-to-edge matching and the equivalence of the invariant line, Δg and Moire Fringe approaches to the crystallographic features of precipitates. Scr. Mater. 52(7), 679–682 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, P. and Zhang, M.: Edge-to-edge matching–a new approach to the morphology and crystallography of precipitates. Mater. Forum 23, 41–62 (1999).Google Scholar
Fu, H., Qiu, D., Zhang, M., Wang, H., Kelly, P., and Taylor, J.: The development of a new grain refiner for magnesium alloys using the edge-to-edge model. J. Alloys Compd. 456(1–2), 390–394 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M-X., Kelly, P., Easton, M., and Taylor, J.: Crystallographic study of grain refinement in aluminum alloys using the edge-to-edge matching model. Acta Mater. 53(5), 1427–1438 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M. and Kelly, P.: Understanding the crystallography of the eutectoid microstructure in a Zn–Al alloy using the edge-to-edge matching model. Scr. Mater. 55(7), 577–580 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M. and Kelly, P.: Application of edge-to-edge matching model to understand the in-plane texture of TiSi2 (C49) thin films on (001)Si surface. Scr. Mater. 55(7), 613–616 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birol, Y.: Survey of inclusions in twin roll casting of wrought aluminium alloys. Int. J. Cast Met. Res. 23(4), 250–255 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondo, S., Tateishi, K., and Ishizawa, N.: Structural evolution of corundum at high temperatures. Jpn. J. App. Phys. 47(47), 616–619 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. and Kang, J.: The structural properties of wurtzite and rocksalt Mg x Zn1−x O. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 23(2), 025008 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiao, Z.Y., Ma, S.H., and Yang, J.F.: A comparison of the electronic and optical properties of zinc-blende, rocksalt and wurtzite AlN: A DFT study. Solid State Sci. 13(2), 331–336 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anishchik, V.M. and Dorozhkin, N.N.: Electronic structure of TiB2 and ZrB2 . Phys. Status Solidi 160(160), 173–177 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinod Kumar, G.S., Murty, B.S., and Chakraborty, M.: Settling behaviour of TiAl3, TiB2, TiC and AlB2 particles in liquid Al during grain refinement. Int. J. Cast Met. Res. 23(4), 193–204 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, P.M., Ren, H.P., Qiu, D., and Zhang, M.X.: Identifying close-packed planes in complex crystal structures. Acta Mater. 58(8), 3091–3095 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M-X., Chen, S-Q., Ren, H-P., and Kelly, P.: Crystallography of the simple HCP/FCC system. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 39(5), 1077–1086 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouyang, L. and Luo, C.: Crystallographic orientation relationship between a Al2O3 and Al in in situ Al2O3 reinforced Al–4Mg matrix composites. Acta Metall. Sin. 41(7), 750–754 (2005).Google Scholar
Pilania, G., Thijsse, B.J., Hoagland, R.G., Lazić, I., Valone, S.M., and Liu, X.Y.: Revisiting the Al/Al2O3 interface: Coherent interfaces and misfit accommodation. Sci. Rep. 4(3), 4485 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, L., Xia, M., Babu, N.H., and Li, J.: Formation of MgAl2O4 at Al/MgO interface. Mater. Trans. 56(3), 277–280 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye, C., Ning, Z., Wang, X.D., Huang, B.X., and Rong, Y.H.. An edge-to-edge matching model and its application to the HCP/FCC system. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. 41(4), 586–591 (2007).Google Scholar
Yang, J., Wang, J.L., Wu, Y.M., Wang, L.M., and Zhang, H.J.: Extended application of edge-to-edge matching model to HCP/HCP (alpha-Mg/MgZn2) system in magnesium alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 460(14), 296–300 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar