Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T15:08:06.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stress-displacement relation of fiber for fiber-reinforced ceramic composites during (indentation) loading and unloading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Chun-Hway Hsueh
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
Mattison K. Ferber
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
Paul F. Becher
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
Get access

Abstract

The stress-displacement relation of the fiber is analyzed for fiber-reinforced ceramic composites during axial compressive loading (indentation) and unloading on the exposed end of an embedded fiber. An unbonded fiber/matrix interface subject to Coulomb friction and residual radial clamping stresses is considered in the present study. The results show that the stress-displacement curves during loading and unloading can be used to evaluate the magnitude of the clamping stress, the coefficient of friction, and the frictional stress distribution at the interface. Specifically, in the absence of Poisson's effect (i.e., when Poisson's ratio of the fiber is zero), the interfacial shear stress is constant, the loading curve is parabolic, and, after complete unloading, the residual fiber displacement equals half of the maximum fiber displacement at the peak loading stress. In the presence of Poisson's effect, the interfacial shear stress is not constant, and, after complete unloading, the residual fiber displacement is less than half of the maximum fiber displacement at the peak loading stress.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Marshall, D.B.Cox, B.N. and Evans, A. G.Acta Metall. 33, 2013 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Evans, A. G. and McMeeking, R. M.Acta Metall. 34, 2435 (1986).Google Scholar
3Becher, P. F.Hsueh, C. H.Angelini, P. and Tiegs, T. N.J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71, 1050 (1988).Google Scholar
4Marshall, D. B. and Oliver, W. C.J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 70, 542 (1987).Google Scholar
5Grande, D. H.Mandell, J. F. and Hong, K. C. C.J. Mater. Sci. 23, 311 (1988).Google Scholar
6Singh, R.N.Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 120, 259 (1988).Google Scholar
7Shetty, D. K.J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71, C107 (1988).Google Scholar
8Faber, K. T.Advani, S.H.Lee, J. K. and Jinn, J.T.J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69, C208 (1986).Google Scholar
9Hsueh, C.H.J. Mater. Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
10Hsueh, C.H.J. Mater. Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
11Hashin, Z. and Rosen, B. W.J. Appl. Mech. 31, 223 (1964).Google Scholar
12Hashin, Z. and Shtrikman, S.J. Mech. Phys. Solids 11, 127 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Ferber, M. K. (unpublished work).Google Scholar
14Hsueh, C.H.J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 7, 497 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Hsueh, C.H. and Becher, P. F. submitted to J. Am. Ceram. Soc.Google Scholar
16Weihs, T. P. and Nix, W. D.Scripta Metall. 22, 271 (1988).Google Scholar
17Bright, J.D.Shetty, D.K.Griffin, C.W. and Limaye, S.Y.J. Am. Ceram. Soc. (in press).Google Scholar
18Hsueh, C.H.J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 8, 739 (1989).Google Scholar
19Hsueh, C.H. submitted to Acta Metall.Google Scholar