Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T14:09:44.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reversible structural relaxation in Fe–B metallic glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Z. Altounian
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, McGill University, 3600 University Street, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2T
J. O. Strom-Olsen
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, McGill University, 3600 University Street, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2T
M. Olivier
Affiliation:
Division of Chemistry, National Research Council, Montreal Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A OR6
Get access

Abstract

Relaxation effects in Fe–B metallic glasses have been studied through measurements of the Curie temperature (Tc) and changes of enthalpy. A monotonic increase in Tc with annealing temperature is observed for all compositions due to irreversible structural relaxation. This increase continues until the start of surface/bulk crystallization. The observed decrease in Tc, upon further annealing is attributed to the strain introduced in the partially glassy system, which masks any evidence for reversible structural relaxation. Enthalpy measurements do show a small reversible structural relaxation. The magnitude of the effect is about a factor of 6 smaller than in ternary metalloid-containing glasses.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1See, for example, Egami, T., in Amorphous Metallic Alloys, edited by Luborsky, F. E. (Butterworths, London, 1983), p. 100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2So, F. F., Kaplow, R., and O'Handley, R. C., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 58, 285 (1983). Reversible effects in Fe80B20 were also reported by A. L. Greer and J. A. Leake in the Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Rapidly Quenched Metals, edited by B. Cantor (Metals Society, London, 1978), p. 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Balanzat, E., Stanley, J. T., Mairy, C., and Hillairet, J., Acta Metall. 33, 785 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Nold, E., Lamparter, P., Olbrich, H., Rainer-Harbach, G., and Steeb, S., Z. Naturforsch. A 36, 1032 (1981).Google Scholar
5Boudreaux, D. S. and Gregor, J. M., J. Appl. Phys. 48, 5057 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Altounian, Z., Strom-Olsen, J. O., and Olivier, M., in Metals Research Society Symposia Proceedings, edited by Giessen, B. C., Polk, D. E., and Taub, A. I. (in press).Google Scholar
7Walter, J. L., Bartram, S. F., and Russell, R. R., Metall. Trans. A 9, 803 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Hasegawa, R. and Ray, R., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 4174 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Walter, J. L., Bartram, S. F., and Mella, I., Mater. Sci. Eng. 36, 193 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Fukamichi, K., Kikuchi, M., Arakawa, S., Masumoto, T., Jagie-linski, T., Arai, K. I., and Tsuya, N., Solid State Commun. 27, 405 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Inoue, A., Chen, M. S., Masumoto, T., and Ajuria, S. A., Sci. Rep. Res. Inst. Tohoku Univ. 1985 (3), 116.Google Scholar
12See, for example, Cantor, B., in Rapidly Quenched Metals, edited by Steeb, S. and Warlimont, H. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985), Vol. 1, p. 595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Misse, U. and Methfessel, S., in Ref. 12, p. 775.Google Scholar