Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T05:42:53.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reactivity in the chromium oxide-calcium fluoride system: An empirical approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Frans Vos
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Heverlee 3001, Belgium
Luc Delaey
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Heverlee 3001, Belgium
Marc De Bonte
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Heverlee 3001, Belgium
Ludo Froyen
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Heverlee 3001, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

The reaction mechanisms observed when sintering loose Cr2O3–CaF2 powder mixtures were analyzed, and the influence of the sintering parameters on the reaction behavior is presented. Using x-ray diffraction (XRD), energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and differential thermal analysis (DTA) measurements, CaCrO4 was shown to be the reaction product when sintering in air. The reaction occurs in two steps: CaF2 transforms to CaO at the Cr2O3–CaF2 interface, followed by a CaO–Cr2O3 interaction, which creates the reaction product. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and x-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis showed an increasing loss of CaF2 with increasing sintering temperature and heating rate, while an opposite evolution of the amount of reaction product was observed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.De Bonte, M., Celis, J. P., Fransaer, J., and Roos, J., in Conference Acts on Hard Chromium Plating: Techniques, Markets and Alternative Processes (Ecoles des Mines, Saint-Etienne, France, 1995).Google Scholar
2.Alexandridou, S., Kiparissides, C., Fransaer, J., and Celis, J. P., Surf. Coat. Technol. 71, 267 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Vos, F., Delaey, L., De Bonte, M., and Froyen, L., in Thermal Spray: Meeting the Challenges of the 21st Century, edited by Coddet, C., 15th International Thermal Spray Conf. Proc., Nice, France (ASM INTERNATIONAL, Materials Park, OH, 1998), p. 117.Google Scholar
4.Alexeyev, N. and Jahanmir, S., Wear 166, 41 (1993).Google Scholar
5.Dellacorte, C. and Laskowski, J. A., Trib. Trans. 40, 163 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Shaw, K.G. and German, R.M., in Thermal Spray: Industrial Applications, edited by Berndt, C. C. and Sampath, S., 7th National Thermal Spray Conf. Proc., Boston, MA (ASM INTERNATIONAL, Materials Park, OH, 1994), p. 399.Google Scholar
7.Vardelle, M., Vardelle, A., and Fauchais, P., J. Therm. Spray. Technol. 2, 79 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Vos, F., Delaey, L., De Bonte, M., and Froyen, L., in Thermal Spray, A United Forum for Scientific and Technological Advances, edited by Berndt, C. C., United Thermal Spray Conf. Proc., Indianapolis, IN (ASM INTERNATIONAL, Materials Park, OH, 1997), p. 49.Google Scholar
9.Masters, K., Spray Drying Handbook, 4th ed. (George Godwin, London, 1985).Google Scholar
10.McEntire, B.J., in Ceramics and Glasses, Engineered Materials Handbook, edited by Schneider, Samuel J. Jr, . (ASM INTERNATIONAL, Materials Park, OH, 1991), Vol. 4, p. 141.Google Scholar
11.Powder Diffraction File Inorganic Phases, edited by Frank McClune, William (JCPDS-International Centre for Diffraction Data, Swarthmore, PA, 1991), p. 113.Google Scholar
12.Levin, E.M., Robbins, C.R., and McMurdie, H.F., Phase Diagrams for Ceramists, 5th ed., edited by Reser, M.K. (The American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1958), p. 45.Google Scholar
13.Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd ed., edited by Massalski, T. B. (ASM INTERNATIONAL, Materials Park, OH, 1990), Vol. 2, p. 1304.Google Scholar
14.Howatson, A.M., Lund, P. G., and Todd, J. D., Engineering Tables and Data (Chapman and Hall, London, 1972), p. 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Fedina, I., Litovsky, E., Shapiro, M., and Shavit, A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80, 2100 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar