Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T16:13:29.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new bulge test technique for the determination of Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio of thin films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

J.J. Vlassak  and
W.D. Nix
J.J. Vlassak
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
W.D. Nix
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
Get access

Abstract

A new analysis of the deflection of square and rectangular membranes of varying aspect ratio under the influence of a uniform pressure is presented. The influence of residual stresses on the deflection of membranes is examined. Expressions have been developed that allow one to measure residual stresses and Young's moduli. By testing both square and rectangular membranes of the same film, it is possible to determine Poisson's ratio of the film. Using standard micromachining techniques, free-standing films of LPCVD silicon nitride were fabricated and tested as a model system. The deflection of the silicon nitride films as a function of film aspect ratio is very well predicted by the new analysis. Young's modulus of the silicon nitride films is 222 ± 3 GPa and Poisson's ratio is 0.28 ± 0.05. The residual stress varies between 120 and 150 MPa. Young's modulus and hardness of the films were also measured by means of nanoindentation, yielding values of 216 ± 10 GPa and 21.0 ± 0.9 GPa, respectively.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 7 , Issue 12 , December 1992 , pp. 3242 - 3249
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Burns, D.W. and Guckel, H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 8 (4), 3606–3613 (1990).Google Scholar
2Beams, J. W., in Mechanical Properties of Thin Films of Gold and Silver (John Wiley and Sons, Inc.), p. 183.Google Scholar
3.Small, M.K. and Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1553–1563 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Small, M. K., Vlassak, J. J., and Nix, W. D., in Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties HI, edited by Nix, William D., Bravman, John C., Arzt, Edward, and Freund, L. Ben (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 239, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992).Google Scholar
5Itozaki, H., Mechanical Properties of Composition Modulated Copper-Palladium, Ph.D. Dissertation, Northwestern University (1982).Google Scholar
6Timoshenko, S. and Woinowski-Krieger, S., in Theory of Plates and Shells (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1987).Google Scholar
7Lin, P., The In-Situ Measurement of Mechanical Properties of Multilayer-Coatings, Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1990).Google Scholar
8Tabata, O., Kawahata, K., Sugiyama, S., and Igarashi, I., Sensors and Actuators 20, 135–141 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Allen, M. G., Mehregani, M., Howe, R. T., and Senturia, S. D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51 (4), 241–243 (1987).Google Scholar
10Jaccodine, R.J. and Schlegel, W.A., J. Appl. Phys. 37 (6), 2429–2434 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Bromley, E.I., Randall, J.N., Flanders, D.C., and Mountain, R.W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 1 (4), 1364–1367 (1983).Google Scholar
12Timoshenko, S. P. and Goodier, J. N., in Theory of Elasticity (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970).Google Scholar
13Doerner, M.F. and Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res. 1, 601–609 (1986).Google Scholar
14Doerner, M. F., Mechanical Properties of Metallic Thin Films on Substrates Using Sub-micron Indentation Methods and Thin Film Stress Measurement Techniques, Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University (1987).Google Scholar
15Taylor, J. A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 9 (4), 2464–2468 (1991).Google Scholar
16Hong, S., Free-standing Multi-layer Thin Film Microstructures for Electronic Systems, Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University (1991).Google Scholar
17Sekimoto, M., Yoshihara, H., and Ohkubo, T., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 21 (4), 1017–1021 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564–1583 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar