Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T13:19:16.833Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new approach to fracture toughness analysis and its application to ABS polymers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Beta Yuhong Ni ,
Tong-Yi Zhang  and
J.C.M. Li
Beta Yuhong Ni
Affiliation:
Materials Science Program, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627
Tong-Yi Zhang
Affiliation:
Materials Science Program, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627
J.C.M. Li
Affiliation:
Materials Science Program, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627
Get access

Abstract

A new approach is proposed to analyze the fracture behavior with crack tip plasticity by the use of three independent measurements: E0 is the energy required per unit length of crack front to prepare the crack just before propagation; the Ef-curve is a plot of the energy required to produce a unit area of fractured surface versus the crack length; and the Ka-curve is a plot of the applied stress intensity factor KIapp versus the crack length. For ABS polymers, the prefracture energy E0 is 33 Jm−1; the Ef-curve is a horizontal line of 5.2 × 104 Jm−2; and the Ka curve has three different regions which depend on the development of the plastic zone during fracture.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 6 , Issue 6 , June 1991 , pp. 1369 - 1373
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Hellan, Kare, Introduction to Fracture Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
2.Kinloch, A. J. and Shaw, S. J., Polymer 24, 1355 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Llorca, J. and Elices, M., Acta Metall. Mater. 12, 2485 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Yu, C. S. and Shetty, D. K., J. of Mater. Sci. 25, 2025 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Rose, L. R. F. and Swain, M. V., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69, 203 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Evans, A. G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 189 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.McMeeking, R. M. and Evans, A. G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 65, 242 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Li, J. C. M. and Sandy, S. C., Acta Metall. 34, 537 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Donald, A. M. and Kramer, E. J., J. Mater. Sci. 17, 176 (1982).Google Scholar
10.Ni, B. Y., Li, J. C. M., and Berry, V. K., Polymer (in press).Google Scholar
11.Kung, T. M. and Li, J. C. M., J. Polym. Sci. Part A 24, 2433 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Rubber-Toughened Plastics, edited by Keith Riew, C. (American Chemical Society, 1989), p. 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Hashemi, S. and Williams, J. G., Polymer 27, 384 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Joe, C. R. and Kim, B. H., J. Mater. Sci. 25, 1991 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.St. John, C., Philos. Mag. 32, 1193 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar