Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:59:23.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Micromechanical properties of a laser-induced iron oxide–aluminum matrix composite coating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2012

S. Nayak
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Center for Laser Applications, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37932
Laura Riester
Affiliation:
High Temperature Materials Laboratory, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
Harry M. Meyer III
Affiliation:
High Temperature Materials Laboratory, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
Narendra B. Dahotre
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Center for Laser Applications, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37932
Get access

Abstract

A laser-based technique was used to deposit Fe3O4 on A319Al, producing an Fe3O4/Al reaction composite coating. Scanning Auger microscopy indicated a reaction between oxide particles and aluminum-forming Fe–Al intermetallic compounds, Al2O3, and various intermediate reaction products. Analysis of the coating region, fractured in vacuo, indicated substantial toughness of the material due to extremely refined microstructure with finely distributed oxide and intermetallic particles and strong interfacial bonding between particles and the matrix. Mechanical properties of the coating were evaluated by nanoindentation techniques employing both Berkovich and cube-corner indenters. Hardness and elastic modulus values were found to be uniform at 1.24 and 76 GPa, respectively. No radial cracking was observed for either the Berkovich or cube-corner indenters. These results indicate that the laser-induced rapidly solidified composite material is tough and fracture resistant.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Avner, S.H., Introduction to Physical Metallurgy (McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1974), pp. 481497.Google Scholar
Sigworth, G.K., AFS Trans. 66, 7 (1983).Google Scholar
Djurdjevic, M., Stockwell, T., and Sokolowski, J., Int. J. Cast Met. Res. 12, 67 (1999).Google Scholar
Pierantoni, M., Gremaud, M., Magnin, P., Stoll, D., and Kurz, W., Acta Metall. Mater. 40, 1637 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, S., Yegneswaran, A.H., and Rohatgi, P.K., J. Mater. Sci. 22, 3173, (1987).Google Scholar
Noordhuis, J.J. and Th.M. De Hosson, Acta Metall. Mater. 40, 3317 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noordhuis, J.J. and Th.M. De Hosson, Acta Metall. Mater. 41, 1989 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, X.B. and J.Th.M. De Hosson, Acta Metall. Mater. 44, 421 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahotre, N.B., Nayak, S., and Popoola, O.O., JOM 53(9), 44 (2001).Google Scholar
Schwartz, B., ASM Handbook, 5th ed. (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 2000), Vol. 6, p. 291.Google Scholar
Hay, J.L. and Pharr, G.M., ASM Handbook (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 2000), Vol. 8, p. 232.Google Scholar
Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).Google Scholar
Harding, D.S., Oliver, W.C., and G.M Pharr, in Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties V, edited by Baker, S.P., Børgesen, P., Townsend, P.H., Ross, C.A., and Volkert, C.A. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 356, Pitsburgh, PA, 1995), p. 663.Google Scholar
Ellingham, H.J.T., J. Soc. Chem. Ind. 63, 125 (1944).Google Scholar
F.D.Richardson and J.H.E. Jeffes, J. Iron Steel Ind. 160, 261 (1948).Google Scholar
Dahotre, N.B., Xiao, C., Boss, W., McCay, M.H., and McCay, T.D., JOM 47(10), 44 (2001).Google Scholar
Doerner, M.F. and Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res. 1, 601 (1086).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pethica, J.B., Hutchings, R., and Oliver, W.C., Philos. Mag. A 48, 593 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, L.E., Metallographic Polishing by Mechanical Methods (Pitman, London, U.K., 1967).Google Scholar
Swadener, J.G., George, E.P., and Pharr, G.M., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 50, 681 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Communication with Prof. George M. Pharr, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.Google Scholar
Y-L. Shen and Y.L. Guo, Model Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 9, 391 (2001).Google Scholar
Lawn, B.R., Evans, A.G., and Marshall, D.B., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 64, 574 (1980).Google Scholar