Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T04:56:27.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical characterization of a bonded tailorable coefficient of thermal expansion lattice with near optimal performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2018

Jonathan B. Berger Open the ORCID record for Jonathan B. Berger [Opens in a new window]  and
Robert M. McMeeking
Jonathan B. Berger*
Affiliation:
Materials Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106-5050, USA; and Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106-5070, USA
Robert M. McMeeking
Affiliation:
Materials Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106-5050, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106-5070, USA; School of Engineering, King’s College, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, Scotland; and Functional Surfaces Department, INM-Leibniz Institute for New Materials, Saarbrücken 66123, Germany
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: berger@engineering.ucsb.edu
Get access

Abstract

Low coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) lattices occupy a unique area of property space. With such a system, it is possible to achieve relatively high stiffness, with opportunities to combine low thermal expansion and with a range of advantageous properties. Possibilities include combinations that are not rivaled by any bulk material, e.g., low CTE and high melting temperature, and low CTE with low conductivity. One design in particular, the UCSB Lattice, has biaxial stiffness very near theoretical upper bounds when the joints are pinned. Bonded lattices are found to inherit the near optimal performance of the parent pin-jointed design. Despite near optimal performance, however, stiffnesses and strengths are limited to a few percent of the relative property of the constituents. The local deformations necessary to accommodate low net CTE are similar to those of auxetic lattices, with similar behavior, having a low, zero, or negative tunable Poisson’s ratio. An investigative framework, including experiments, finite element, and analytical formulas, is used to construct these assessments.

Keywords

thermal stressesstructuralcellular (material type)
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 33 , Issue 20 , 29 October 2018 , pp. 3383 - 3397
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Steeves, C.A., dos Santos e Lucato, S.L., He, M., Antinucci, E., Hutchinson, J.W., and Evans, A.G.: Concepts for structurally robust materials that combine low thermal expansion with high stiffness. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 55, 1803–1822 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, F., Keiber, T., Juhas, P., Billinge, S.J.L., Sutton, L., Wilde, J., and Kowach, G.R.: Local vibrations and negative thermal expansion in ZrW2O8. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 045505 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, J., Mercer, C., McMeeking, R.M., and Evans, A.G.: The design of bonded bimaterial lattices that combine low thermal expansion with high stiffness. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 94, s42–s54 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehman, J. and Lakes, R.: Stiff, strong zero thermal expansion lattices via the Poisson effect. J. Mater. Res. 28, 2499–2508 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ha, C.S., Hestekin, E., Li, J., Plesha, M.E., and Lakes, R.S.: Controllable thermal expansion of large magnitude in chiral negative Poisson’s ratio lattices. Phys. Status Solidi 252, 1431–1434 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakes, R.S.: Cellular solid structures with unbounded thermal expansion. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 15, 475–477 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G., Parthasarathy, T.A., and Kerans, R.J.: Tailorable thermal expansion hybrid structures. Int. J. Solids Struct. 46, 2372–2387 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigmund, O. and Torquato, S.: Composites with extremal thermal expansion coefficients. Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 3203–3205 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toropova, M.M. and Steeves, C.A.: Adaptive bimaterial lattices to mitigate thermal expansion mismatch stresses in satellite structures. Acta Astronaut. 113, 132–141 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palumbo, N.M.A., Smith, C.W., Miller, W., and Evans, K.E.: Near-zero thermal expansivity 2-D lattice structures: Performance in terms of mass and mechanical properties. Acta Mater. 59, 2392–2403 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehman, J. and Lakes, R.S.: Stiff, strong, zero thermal expansion lattices via material hierarchy. Compos. Struct. 107, 654–663 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, K., Chen, H., Pei, Y., and Fang, D.: Planar lattices with tailorable coefficient of thermal expansion and high stiffness based on dual-material triangle unit. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 86, 173–191 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, J.B., Lange, K.J., and Spadaccini, C.M.: Designing microstructural architectures with thermally actuated properties using freedom, actuation, and constraint topologies. J. Mech. Des. 135, 061004 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhein, R.K., Novak, M.D., Levi, C.G., and Pollock, T.M.: Bimetallic low thermal-expansion panels of Co-base and silicide-coated Nb-base alloys for high-temperature structural applications. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528, 3973–3980 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steeves, C.A., Mercer, C., Antinucci, E., He, M.Y., and Evans, A.G.: Experimental investigation of the thermal properties of tailored expansion lattices. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 5, 195–202 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steeves, C.A. and Evans, A.G.: Optimization of thermal protection systems utilizing sandwich structures with low coefficient of thermal expansion lattice hot faces. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 94, s55–s61 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steeves, C.A. and Toropova, M.M.: Thermal actuation through bimaterial lattices. In Proceedings of the ASME 2015 Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures & Intelligent Systems (ASME, Colorado Springs, 2015); pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Toropova, M. and Steeves, C.: Bimaterial lattices with anisotropic thermal expansion. J. Mech. Mater. Struct. 9, 227–244 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gdoutos, E., Shapiro, A.A., and Daraio, C.: Thin and thermally stable periodic metastructures. Exp. Mech. 53, 1735–1742 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, J., Meza, L.R., Schaedler, T.A., Schwaiger, R., Zheng, X., and Valdevit, L.: Nanolattices: An emerging class of mechanical metamaterials. Adv. Mater. 1701850, 1–26 (2017).Google Scholar
Simulia, ABAQUS CAE (2015). Available at: www.3ds.com.Google Scholar
Danielsson, M., Parks, D.M., and Boyce, M.C.: Three-dimensional micromechanical modeling of voided polymeric materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 50, 351–379 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibiansky, L.V. and Torquato, S.: Thermal expansion of isotropic multiphase composites and polycrystals. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 45, 1223–1252 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bückmann, T., Thiel, M., Kadic, M., Schittny, R., and Wegener, M.: An elasto-mechanical unfeelability cloak made of pentamode metamaterials. Nat. Commun. 5, 1–6 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sigmund, O. and Torquato, S.: Design of materials with extreme thermal expansion using a three-phase topology. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 45, 1037–1067 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spadoni, A. and Ruzzene, M.: Elasto-static micropolar behavior of a chiral auxetic lattice. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 60, 156–171 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar