Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T18:19:11.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low volume fraction SiCp/AA 380.0 composites fabricated by vacuum infiltration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Wen-Sheng Chung
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
Shou-Yi Chang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
Su-Jien Lin
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
Get access

Abstract

A vacuum infiltration process has been developed to fabricate the aluminum matrix composites reinforced with low volume fraction (<50 vol%) of SiCp. Generally, it is difficult to fabricate low volume fraction particulate composites by traditional infiltration processes because the particles always pack up to about 50 vol% in the preforms or compacts. In this study, the powder compacts were prepared of the well-mixed Ni-coated SiCp and pure aluminum powders and then were packed in quartz tubes. An aluminum alloy (Al–8.7% Si–2.6% Cu) with a composition similar to AA 380.0 was used to infiltrate these compacts. Experimental results showed that the infiltration temperature of 640 °C is favorable for the fabrication of these composites. Infiltration behavior, microstructure, nickel distribution, bending test, and fractography of the composites were investigated.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Maxwell, P.B., Martins, G.P., Olson, D. L., and Edwards, G.R., Metall. Trans. B 21, 475 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Alonso, A., Pamies, A., Narciso, J., Garcia-Cordovilla, C., and Louis, E., Metall. Trans. A 24, 1423 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Cook, A.J. and Werner, P.S., Mater. Sci. Eng. A144, 189 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Fletcher, T. R., Cornie, J. A., and Russell, K. C., Mater. Sci. Eng. A144, 159 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Friend, C. M., Horsfall, I., and Burrows, C. L., J. Mater. Sci. 26, 225 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Muscat, D., Shanker, K., and Drew, R. A. L., Mater. Sci. Technol. 8, 971 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Chiou, J. M. and Chung, D. D.L, J. Mater. Sci. 26, 2583 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Nakanishi, H., Tsunekawa, Y., Okumiya, M., and Mohri, N., Mater. Trans. JIM 34, 62 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Yang, J. and Chung, D. D. L., J. Mater. Sci. 24, 3605 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Nourbakhsh, S., Rhee, W. H., Sahin, O., and Margolin, H., Mater. Sci. Eng. A153, 619 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Mortensen, A., Michaud, V.J., and Flemings, M. C., JOM 45 (1), 36 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Allison, J. E. and Cole, G.S., JOM 45 (1), 19 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Chen, R. and Zhang, G., Comp. Sci. Technol. 47, 51 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Hanumanth, G.S. and Irons, G. A., J. Mater. Sci. 28, 2459 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials, ASM Handbook (ASM INTERNATIONAL, Metals Park, OH, 1990), Vol. 2, p. 168.Google Scholar
16.Lukes, R.M., Plating 51, 969 (1964).Google Scholar
17.Chung, W. S. and Lin, S.J., Mater. Res. Bull. 31, 1437 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Parker, K., Plat. Sur. Fin. 79, 29 (1992).Google Scholar
19.Frank, W. B., Koch, G. P., Mills, J. J., and Brandt, J. L., in Aluminum: Properties and Physical Metallurgy, edited by Hatch, J. E. (ASM INTERNATIONAL, Metals Park, OH, 1984), p. 16.Google Scholar
20.Alloy Phase Diagrams, ASM Handbook (ASM INTERNATIONAL, Materials Park, OH, 1992), Vol. 3, p. 249.Google Scholar