Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:48:52.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydrothermal epitaxy of KtaO3 thin films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Gregory K. L. Goh*
Affiliation:
Materials Department and Materials Research Laboratory, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106
Carlos G. Levi
Affiliation:
Materials Department and Materials Research Laboratory, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106
Fred F. Lange
Affiliation:
Materials Department and Materials Research Laboratory, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: g-goh@imre.org.sg
Get access

Abstract

Heteroepitaxial KTaO3 thin films were synthesized by the hydrothermal method below 175 °C in highly alkaline aqueous KOH solutions. KTaO3 films synthesized in 7 M KOH solutions contained a defect pyrochlore phase that had (400) and (111) out-of-plane orientations. The (400) oriented pyrochlore islands were epitaxially related to the (100) SrTiO3 substrate while the (111) oriented pyrochlore islands had four in-plane variants. Pyrochlore-free KTaO3 films could be synthesized in a 15 M KOH solution. Pyrochlore-free films were also grown at 7 M KOH by delaying the introduction of the (100) SrTiO3 substrate into the synthesis solution until the conditions favoring the formation of the pyrochlore phase had dissipated.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Feenstra, R., Boatner, L.A., Budai, J.D., Christen, D.K., Galloway, M.D., and Poker, D.B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 1063 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Vendik, O.G., Hollmann, E.K., Kozyrev, A.B., and Prudan, A.M., J. Superconductivity 12, 325 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Christen, H.M., Boatner, L.A., Budai, J.D., Chisholm, M.F., Gea, L.A., Marrero, P.J., and Norton, D.P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 1488 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Boikov, Y.A., Ivanov, Z.G., Olsson, E., and Claeson, T., Physica C 282–287, 111 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Chien, A.T., Zhao, L., Colic, M., Speck, J.S., and Lange, F.F., J. Mater. Res. 13, 649 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Chien, A.T., Kim, J.H., Sachleben, J., Speck, J.S., and Lange, F.F., J. Mater. Res. 14, 3303 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Goh, G.K.L., Haile, S., Levi, C.G., and Lange, F.F., J. Mater. Res. (2002, accepted).Google Scholar
8. Powder Diffraction Files, Card No. 35-1464 (Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards, Swarthmore, PA, 1992).Google Scholar
9. Powder Diffraction Files, Card No. 38-1470 (Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards, Swarthmore, PA, 1992).Google Scholar
10.Aleshin, E. and Roy, R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 45, 18 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Longo, J.M., Raccah, P.M., and Goodenough, J.B., Mater. Res. Bull. 4, 191 (1969).Google Scholar
12. Powder Diffraction Files, Card No. 35-734 (Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards, Swarthmore, PA, 1992).Google Scholar
13.Balluffi, R.W., Brokman, A., and King, A.H., Acta. Metall. 30, 1453 (1982).Google Scholar
14.Lange, F.F., Science 273, 903 (1996).Google Scholar
15.Onuma, K., Tsukamoto, T., and Sunagawa, I., J. Cryst. Growth 98, 384 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Xiao, R-F., Iwan, J., Alexander, D., and Rosenberger, F., Phys. Rev. A 43, 2977 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar