Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:03:24.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fabrication, characterization, and leach testing of hollandite, (Ba,Cs)(Al,Ti)2Ti6O16

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

M. L. Carter
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science & Technology Organization, New Illawarra Road, Menai 2234, Australia
E. R. Vance
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science & Technology Organization, New Illawarra Road, Menai 2234, Australia
D. R. G. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science & Technology Organization, New Illawarra Road, Menai 2234, Australia
J. V. Hanna
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science & Technology Organization, New Illawarra Road, Menai 2234, Australia
Z. Zhang
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science & Technology Organization, New Illawarra Road, Menai 2234, Australia
E. Loi
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science & Technology Organization, New Illawarra Road, Menai 2234, Australia
Get access

Abstract

The dissolution in de-ionized water (DIW) at 90 and 150 °C of Cs and Ba from mechanically polished Cs-doped Ba hollandite samples is essentially congruent. The normalized Ba and Cs release rates were <0.001 g/m2/day after 56 days in DIW at 90 °C, and the Ba normalized release rate of a Cs-free sample was 0.01 g/m2/day after 56 days in DIW at 150 °C. Varying the pH between approximately 2.5 and 12.9 affected only the Ba dissolution rates of hollandite by half an order of magnitude. The dissolution rates of all species decrease with increasing leaching time due to the formation of partly impervious surface coatings of Al- and Ti-rich species. These surface coatings were investigated by scanning electron microscopy, and in some cases by cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Ringwood, A.E., Kesson, S.E., Reeve, K.D., Levins, D.M., and Ramm, E.J., in Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C. (North-Holland, New York, 1988), p. 233.Google Scholar
2.Kesson, S.E. and White, T.J., Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A. 408, 73 (1986).Google Scholar
3.Cheary, R.W. and Kwiatkowska, J., J. Nucl. Mater. 125, 236 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Cheary, R.W., Acta Cryst. B. 43, 28 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Kesson, S.E., Radioact. Waste Manage. Nucl. Fuel Cycle. 2, 53 (1983).Google Scholar
6.Carter, M.L. and Vance, E.R., in Proceedings of PacRim2, edited by Walls, P., Sorrell, C., and Ruys, A. (Sym16, Australian Ceramic Society, Sydney, 1998) [CD-ROM].Google Scholar
7.Pham, D.K., Myhra, S., and Turner, P.S., J. Mater. Res. 9, 3174 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.MCC-1P Static Leach Test Method (Rev. 1), DOE TIC 11400 (Materials Characterization Center, Battelle Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA, 1983).Google Scholar
9.Knauss, K.G. and Wolery, T.J., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 50, 2481 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Goodhew, P.J., Practical Methods in Electron Microscopy, edited by Glauert, A.M. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1973).Google Scholar
11.Hartmann, J.S., Vance, E.R., Power, W.P., and Hanna, J.V., J. Mater. Res. 13, 22 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Carter, M., Vance, E., Attard, D., and Mitchell, D., American Ceramic Society Meeting, May 2002.Google Scholar
13.Smith, K.L, Lumpkin, G.L., Blackford, M.G., Day, R.A., and Hart, K.P, J. Nucl. Mater. 190, 287 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Hart, K.P, Vance, E. R, Day, R.A., Begg, B.D., Angel, P.J., and Jostsons, A., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIX, edited by Murphy, W.M. and Knecht, D.A. (Mater. Res. Sec. Synp. Proc. 412, Pittsburgh, PA 1996), p 41.Google Scholar