Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T23:29:47.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental investigation on HCF strength affected by predamage from LCF of a near alpha titanium alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2014

Huang Jia
Affiliation:
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
Luo Yinyin
Affiliation:
Shanghai Electric Power Equipment Co., Ltd., Shanghai Steam Turbine Factory, Shanghai 200240, China
Shi Duoqi*
Affiliation:
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
Yang Xiaoguang
Affiliation:
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
Yu Huichen
Affiliation:
Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing 100095, China
Zhao Pengtao
Affiliation:
Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing 100095, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: shdq@buaa.edu.cn
Get access

Abstract

The feasibility of an accelerated test method on revealing the high cycle fatigue (HCF) limit stresses of a near alpha titanium alloy was successfully verified firstly during the rotary bending tests. The stress-controlled low cycle fatigue (LCF) tests at room temperature were then carried out over a range of maximum stresses and stress ratios to reveal the basic LCF strength. Finally, the core emphasis was focused on the influences of the predamage from LCF loadings on the subsequent HCF limit stresses corresponding to the life of 106 cycles. A total of eight levels of predamage from LCF with different stress levels, stress ratios, and proportions of LCF life were introduced, which resulted in obvious deterioration of the HCF stress limits (even under only 2% of expected LCF life). The fracture analysis exhibited that there were typical LCF failure characteristics in crack initiation regions of specimens under prior LCF loadings.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ren, W. and Nicholas, T.: Effects and mechanisms of low cycle fatigue and plastic deformation on subsequent high cycle fatigue limit in nickel-base superalloy Udimet 720. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 332(1), 236 (2002).Google Scholar
Ritchie, R.O., Davidson, D.L., and Boyce, B.L.: High-cycle fatigue of Ti-6Al-4V. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 22(7), 621 (1999).Google Scholar
Nicholas, T. and Zuiker, J.R.: On the use of the Goodman diagram for high cycle fatigue design. Int. J. Fract. 80(2–3), 219 (1989).Google Scholar
Nicholas, T.: Critical issues in high cycle fatigue. Int. J. Fatigue 21, S221 (1999).Google Scholar
Singh, N. and Singh, V.: Low cycle fatigue behavior of Ti alloy IMI 834 at room temperature. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 325(1), 324 (2002).Google Scholar
Zeng, Y., ZhaO, Y.Q., Hong, Q., and Yang, G.J.: High cycle fatigue property of Ti-600 alloy at ambient temperature. J. Alloys. Compd. 509(5), 2081 (2011).Google Scholar
Singh, P.N., Ramachandra, C., and Singh, B.K.: Room-temperature low-cycle fatigue behaviour of Ti-27Al-15Nb alloy. Bull. Mater. Sci. 18(2), 161 (1995).Google Scholar
Mall, S., Nicholas, T., and Park, T.W.: Effect of predamage from low cycle fatigue on high cycle fatigue strength of Ti-6Al-4V. Int. J. Fatigue 25(9), 1109 (2003).Google Scholar
Huang, Z., Wang, Q., and Wagner, D.: Effect of low cycle fatigue predamage on very high cycle fatigue. Theor. Appl. Mech. Lett. 2(3), 031007 (2012).Google Scholar
Srivatsan, T.S., Kuruvilla, M., and Park, L.: A study at understanding the mechanisms governing the high cycle fatigue and final fracture behavior of the titanium alloy: Ti-4Al-2.5V. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 527(3), 435 (2010).Google Scholar
Dehghan-Manshadi, A., Reid, M.H., and Dippenaar, R.J.: Effect of microstructural morphology on the mechanical properties of titanium alloys. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 240(1), 012022 (2010).Google Scholar
Li, B., Ma, N., and Liu, X.L.: Fatigue properties of titanium alloy TA11 under multiaxial loadings with tension-bending vibration. Adv. Mater. Res. 887, 873 (2014).Google Scholar
China Aeronautical Materials Handbook Editorial Board, China Aeronautical Materials Handbook, Vol. 3, 2nd ed. (Standards Press of China, Beijing, 2002), p. 847.Google Scholar
Maxwell, D.C. and Nicholas, T.: A rapid method for generation of a Haigh diagram for high cycle fatigue. Fatigue Fract. Mech. 29, 626 (1999).Google Scholar
Paul, S.K., Sivaprasad, S., and Dhar, S.: Ratcheting and low cycle fatigue behavior of SA333 steel and their life prediction. J. Nucl. Mater. 401(1), 17 (2010).Google Scholar
Totten, G.: Fatigue crack propagation. Adv. Mater. Processes 166(5), 39 (2008).Google Scholar
Brechet, Y., Magnin, T., and Sornette, D.: The Coffin-Manson law as a consequence of the statistical nature of the LCF surface damage. Acta Metal. Mater. 40(9), 2281 (1992).Google Scholar
Russ, S.M.: Effect of LCF on HCF crack growth of Ti-17. Int. J. Fatigue 27(10), 1628 (2005).Google Scholar