Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T15:04:00.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of the calcium dopant on oxide ion diffusion in yttria ceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Noriko Saito
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Laboratory, National Institute for Materials Science, 1–1 Namiki, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–0044, Japan
Hajime Haneda
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Laboratory, National Institute for Materials Science, 1–1 Namiki, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–0044, Japan
Isao Sakaguchi
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Laboratory, National Institute for Materials Science, 1–1 Namiki, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–0044, Japan
Takayasu Ikegami
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Laboratory, National Institute for Materials Science, 1–1 Namiki, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–0044, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Tracer oxygen diffusion coefficients, D*, in polycrystalline yttria doped with Ca have been determined by a gas–solid exchange technique and secondary ion mass spectrometry. Samples containing few pores were used to avoid their influences on diffusion profiles. The resulting profiles were assigned only to volume diffusion; no grain boundary diffusion was observed. According to the effects of Ca doping on D*, the Ca contents are divided into three regions. In a Ca content region of 0–0.17 mol%, D* changed a little with Ca doping and took a minimum experimentally at 0.02 mol%. D* increased significantly within a range of 0.17–0.54 mol% and saturated at 0.54 mol% or above because of a solubility limit. The activation energies of oxygen diffusion were estimated at 249–282 kJ/mol.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Wyckoff, R.W.G., Crystal Structure, 2nd ed. (Interscience Publisher, New York, 1967), Vol. 2, p. 4.Google Scholar
2Ando, K., Oishi, Y., and Hase, H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 66, C222 (1983).Google Scholar
3Ando, K. and Oishi, Y., in Proc. of Transport in Non Stoichiometric Compounds, edited by Simkovich, G. and Stubican, V.S. (Plenum, New York, 1985), p. 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Larring, Y., Norby, T., and Kofstad, P., Solid State Ionics 49, 73 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Katayama, K., Osawa, H., Akiba, T., and Yanagida, H., J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 6, 39 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Ando, K., Oishi, Y., and Hidaka, Y., J. Chem. Phys. 65, 2751 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Saito, N., Matsuda, S., and Ikegami, T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81, 2023 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Haneda, H. and Monty, C., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72, 1153 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Klug, H.P. and Alexander, L.E., X-Ray Diffraction Procedures for Polycrystalline and Amorphous Materials, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1974), p. 594.Google Scholar
10Brown, J. and Etsell, T.H., Solid State Ionics, 57, 251 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Crank, J., The Mathematics of Diffusion, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1975), Chap. 3.3.Google Scholar
12Haneda, H., Saito, N., Sakaguchi, I., and Ikegami, T. (submitted).Google Scholar
13Saito, N. and Haneda, H. (unpublished).Google Scholar
14Kröger, F.A. and Vink, H.J., Solid State Phys. 3, 307 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Tallan, N.N. and Vest, R.W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 49, 401 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Kofstad, P., Nonstoichiometry, Diffusion, and Electrical Conduc-tivity in Binary Metal Oxides (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1972), Chap. 3.Google Scholar
17Philibert, J., Diffusion et Transport de Maitère dans les Solides (Diffusion and Transport of Materials in Solids) (Les Éditions de Phisique, Paris, France, 1985), p. 91.Google Scholar