Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T21:49:55.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of MnO on the microstructures, phase stability, and mechanical properties of ceria-partially-stabilized zirconia (Ce–TZP) and Ce–TZP–Al2O3 composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

J. S. Wang ,
J. F. Tsai ,
D. K. Shetty  and
A. V. Virkar
J. S. Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
J. F. Tsai
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
D. K. Shetty
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
A. V. Virkar
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
Get access

Abstract

The effects of increasing amounts of MnO additions on the microstructures, phase stability, and mechanical properties of ZrO2–12 mol % CeO2 and ZrO2–12 mol% CeO2–10 wt.% Al2O3 were studied. MnO suppressed grain growth in ZrO2–12 mol% CeO2, while enhancing the mechanical properties significantly (strength = 557 MPa, fracture toughness = 9.3 MPa at 0.2 wt.% MnO). The enhanced mechanical properties were achieved despite an increased stability of the tetragonal phase, as evidenced by a lower burst transformation temperature (Mb) and a reduced volume fraction of the monoclinic phase on the fracture surface. In ZrO2–12 mol% CeO2–10 wt.% Al2O3, the addition of MnO suppressed the grain size of ZrO2, while promoting grain growth and changing the morphology of Al2O3. More significantly, the stability of the tetragonal ZrO2 phase decreased (high Mb temperature) with a concurrent increase in fracture toughness (13.2 MPa at 2 wt.% MnO) and transformation plasticity (1.2% in four-point bending). The widths of the transformation zones observed adjacent to the fracture surfaces showed a consistent inverse relation to the transformation yield stress, as would be expected from the mechanics of stress-induced phase transformation at crack tips. The improvements in mechanical properties obtained in the base Ce–TZP and the Ce–TZP–Al2O3 composite ceramics with the addition of MnO are critically examined in the context of transformation toughening and other possible mechanisms.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 5 , Issue 9 , September 1990 , pp. 1948 - 1957
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Tsukuma, K. and Takahata, T., in Advanced Structural Ceramics, edited by Becher, P. F., Swain, M. V., and Somiya, S. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987), Vol. 78, pp. 123–135.Google Scholar
2Gupta, T. K., Bechtold, J. H., Kuznicki, R. C., Cadoff, L. H., and Rossing, B. R., J. Mater. Sci. 12, 2421–2426 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Lange, F. F., J. Mater. Sci. 17, 240–246 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Tsukuma, K., Ueda, K., Matsushita, K., and Shimada, M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 68 (2), C–56 (1985).Google Scholar
5Tsukuma, K. and Shimada, M., J. Mater. Sci. 20, 1178–1184 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Tsukuma, K., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 65 (10), 1386–1389 (1986).Google Scholar
7Tsukuma, K., Takahata, T., and Shiomi, M., in Advances in Ceramics, edited by Somiya, S., Yamamoto, N., and Hanagida, H. (The American Ceramic Society, Inc., 1988), Vol. 24B.Google Scholar
8Virkar, A. V. and Matsumoto, R. L. K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69 (10), C–224 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Virkar, A. V. and Matsumoto, R. L. K., in Advances in Ceramics, edited by Somiya, S., Yamamoto, N., and Hanagida, H. (The American Ceramic Society, Inc., 1988), Vol. 24B, pp. 653–662.Google Scholar
10Srinivasan, G. V., Jue, J. F., Kuo, S. Y., and Virkar, A. V., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. (1990, in press).Google Scholar
11Reyes-Morel, P. E. and Chen, I-Wei, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71 (5), 343–353 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Reyes-Morel, P. E., Cherng, J. S., and Chen, I-Wei, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71 (8), 648–657 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Yu, C. S. and Shetty, D. K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72 (6), 921–928 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Yu, C. S. and Shetty, D. K., J. Mater. Sci. 25, 2025–2035 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Rose, L. R. F. and Swain, M. V., Acta Metall, 36 (4), 955–962 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Toraya, H., Yoshimura, M., and Somiya, S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 67 (9), C–119 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 MIL-STD-1942 (MR), “Flexure Strength of High Performance Ceramics at Ambient Temperature”, November (1983).Google Scholar
18Huang, S. L. and Chen, I.-Wei, “Grain Growth Control in Zirconia Polycrystals”, paper presented at the 4th Int. Conf. on the Science and Technology of Zirconia, Annaheim, CA, November 1 (1989).Google Scholar
19Heuer, A. H., Claussen, N., Kriven, W. M., and Ruhle, M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 65 (12), 642–650 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Heuer, A. H. and Ruhle, M., Acta Metall. 33 (12), 2101–2112 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Mehta, K. and Virkar, A. V., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 (3), 567–574 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar