Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T01:37:56.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of environment on the tribological properties of polycrystalline diamond films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

M. N. Gardos
Affiliation:
Hughes Aircraft Company, Technology Support Division, El Segundo, California 90245
B. L. Soriano
Affiliation:
Hughes Aircraft Company, Technology Support Division, El Segundo, California 90245
Get access

Abstract

Essentially pure, ∼1.5 μm thick, polycrystalline diamond films DC–PACVD deposited on polycrystalline α-SiC flats were friction and wear tested against similarly coated α-SiC pins. The oscillatory sliding tests were performed with a Knudsen cell-type, wide temperature range tribometer built into a scanning electron microscope. Experiments were completed in 1.33 × 10−3 Pa (1 × 10−5 Torr) and 13.3 Pa (1 × 10−1 Torr) Pair, at test flat temperatures cycled to 850°C and back to room temperature. The results are compared with similar tests previously completed with diamond versus bare α–SiC and diamond versus Si(100) sliding combinations. In the absence of in situ surface analytical capability in the SEM tribometer, the findings are interpreted based on relevant information collected from the literature. The data indicate that the friction of the respective, tangentially sheared interfaces depends on the generation and annihilation of dangling bonds. Desorption of hydrogen during heating and sliding under the electron beam, in vacuum, create unoccupied orbitals on the rubbing surfaces. These dangling bonds spin-pair with others donated from the counterface, leading to high friction. Resorption of adsorbates such as hydrogen (e.g., by cooling the tribosystem) lowers the interfacial adhesion and friction. At high temperatures, in vacuum, the interaction energy may also be reduced by surface reconstruction and graphitization. At high temperatures, in Pair, the coefficient of friction of diamond versus itself is substantially lower than that in vacuum. This reduction is most probably caused by the generation of oxidation products combined with the temperature-shear-oxygen-induced phase transformation of diamond to graphite. The wide temperature wear rates of pure, polycrystalline diamond, characteristic of our test procedure, varied from ∼4 × 1016 m3/N · m in 1.33 × 10−3 Pa vacuum to ∼1 × 10−15 m3/N · m in 13.3 Pair.

Type
Diamond and Diamond-Like Materials
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Gardos, M. N. and Ravi, K.V., Proc. 1st Int. Symp. on Diamond and Diamond-Like Coatings (The Electrochem. Soc. Proc, 1989), Vol. 89–12, p. 475.Google Scholar
2Gardos, M. N. and Soriano, B. L., Proc. 4th Ann. SDIO/IST-ONR Dia. Tech. Initiative Symp., July 11–13, 1989, Crystal City, VA, Paper Th 5 (Extended Abstract).Google Scholar
3Gardos, M. N., “Tribological Fundamentals of Solid Lubricated Ceramics”, Surf. Coatings & Technol. (in press).Google Scholar
4Pepper, S.V., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 20, 643 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Goddard, W. A., III, Eng. & Sci. (Caltech) XLIX, 2 (1985).Google Scholar
6Lurie, P. G. and Wilson, J. M., Surf. Sci. 65, 453 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Pandey, K. C., Phys. Rev. B 25, 4338 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Pate, B. B., Surf. Sci. 165, 83 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Hamza, A.V., Kubiak, G. D., and Stulen, R. H., Surf. Sci. 206, L833 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Kubiak, G. D. and Kolasinski, K., Phys. Rev. B 39, 1381 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Kubiak, G.D., Hamza, A.V., and Stulen, R.H., Proc. 4th Ann. SDIO/IST-ONR Dia. Tech. Initiative Symp., July 11–13, 1989, Crystal City, VA, Paper W9 (Extended Abstract).Google Scholar
12Kamo, M., Yurimoto, H., and Sato, Y., Appl. Surf. Sci. 33/34, 553 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Williams, B. E. and Glass, J.T., J. Mater. Res. 4, 373 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Seager, C. H. and Lenahan, P. M., J. Appl. Phys. 48, 2709 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Seager, C. H., Lenahan, P. M., Brower, K. L., and Mikawa, R. E., J. Appl. Phys. 58, 2704 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Goddard, W.A. III, and McGill, T.C., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 16, 1308 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Wilks, J. and Wilks, E. M., in Properties of Diamond, edited by Field, J. (Academic Press, London, 1979), Chap. 11.Google Scholar