Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T10:55:53.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of annealing environments on the epitaxial recrystallization of ion-beam-amorphized SrTiO3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

J. Rankin*
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
J.C. McCallum*
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
L.A. Boatner
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
*
a)Present address: Radcliffe College, Mary Ingraham Bunting Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
b)Present address: Microelectronics and Materials Technology Centre, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, GPO Box 2476V, 3001, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

Time-resolved reflectivity and Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy were used to investigate the effects of regrowth environments on the thermally induced solid phase epitaxial (SPE) regrowth of amorphous near-surface layers produced by ion implantation of single-crystal SrTiO3. Water vapor in the regrowth atmosphere was found to alter both the apparent rate and activation energy of the SPE regrowth. For relatively dry atmospheres, a single constant regrowth rate is observed at any given temperature, and the activation energy is 1.2 ± 0.1 eV. When the concentration of H2O vapor in the atmosphere is increased, however, the regrowth activation energy effectively decreases to ∼0.95 eV. When regrown in atmospheres containing H2O vapor, the SrTiO3 amorphous layer exhibits two distinct stages of SPE regrowth as compared to the single rate found for dry anneals. This two-stage process apparently results from the diffusion of H/OH from the regrowth atmosphere at the surface of the crystal through the amorphous layer to the regrowing crystalline/amorphous interface.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Naguib, H. and Kelly, R., Rad. Eff. 25, 1 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.White, C. W., McHargue, C. J., Sklad, P. S., Boatner, L. A., and Farlow, G. C., Mater. Sci. Rep. 4 (2,3), 43(1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.White, C.W., Boatner, L.A., Sklad, P.S., McHargue, C.J., Rankin, J., Farlow, G. C., and Aziz, M.J., Nucl. Instrum. Methods in Phys. Res. B 32, 11 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Ion Implantation in Semiconductors, edited by Chernov, F., Borders, J. A., and Brice, D. K. (Plenum Press, New York, 1976).Google Scholar
5.Treatise on Materials Science and Technology, edited by Hirvonen, J.K. (Academic Press, New York, 1980).Google Scholar
6.Farlow, G. C., White, C. W., McHargue, C. J., Sklad, P. S., and Appleton, B. R., Nucl. Instrum. Methods in Phys. Res. B 7/8, 541 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.McHargue, C. J., Farlow, G. C., Sklad, P. S., White, C. W., Perez, A., Kornilios, N., and Marest, G., Nucl. Instrum. Methods in Phys. Res. B 19/20, 813 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.McHargue, C.J., White, C.W., Appleton, B.R., Farlow, G.C., and Williams, J. M., Ion Implantation and Ion Beam Processing of Materials, edited by Hubner, G.K., Hollan, O. W., Clayton, C.R., and White, C. W. (North-Holland, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
9.Buchal, C., Ashley, P. R., and Appleton, B. R., J. Mater. Res. 2, 222 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.White, C.W., Sklad, P.S., Boatner, L.A., Farlow, G.C., McHargue, C.J., Sales, B. C., and Aziz, M. J., in Defect Properties and Processing of High-Technology Nonmetallic Materials, edited by Chen, Y., Kingery, W. D., and Stokes, R. J. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 60, Pittsburgh, PA, 1986), p. 337.Google Scholar
11.Rankin, J., “Ion-Beam Damage and Recovery Effects in Three Perovskite-Type Oxides,” Ph. D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1989.Google Scholar
12.Olson, G.L. and Roth, J.A., Mater. Sci. Rep. 31 (1), 1 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Cordova, M., Phys. Rev. 160 (2A), A651 (1965).Google Scholar
14.Born, M. and Wolf, E., Principles of Optics, 6th ed. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1980).Google Scholar
15.Rankin, J., Sheldon, B.W., McCallum, J.C., and Boatner, L.A., to be published.Google Scholar
16.McCallum, J. C., Rankin, J., Boatner, L. A., and White, C. W., Nucl. Instrum. Methods in Phys. Res. B 46, 98 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Fratello, V.J., Hays, J.F., and Turnbull, D.J., J. Appl. Phys. 51 (9), 4718 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Leko, V.K. and Komarova, L. A., Inorg. Mater, (trans.) 11, 1597 (1975).Google Scholar
19.Whittemore, . O. J. and Varela, J. A., in Adv. Ceram., edited by W. D. Kingery, ed., 10, 583 (1984).Google Scholar
20.Nassau, . K. and Miller, A. E., J. Cryst. Growth 91, 373 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Ohkubo, . M., Hioki, .T., and Kawamoto, J-I., J. Appl. Phys. 62, 3069 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Sklad, P. S., in Proc. 45th Annual Meeting of the Electron Microscopy Society of America, edited by Bailey, G. W. (San Francisco Press, San Francisco, CA, 1987), p. 146.Google Scholar
23.Dudney, . N.J., Bates, .J.B., and Wang, J.C., Phys. Rev. B 24 (12), 6831 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Bates, . J.B., Wang, J.C., and Perkins, R.A., Phys. Rev. B 19, 4130 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar