Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T21:21:50.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determination of directionality of nonequibiaxial residual stress by nanoindentation testing using a modified Berkovich indenter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2018

Jong-hyoung Kim ,
Huiwen Xu ,
Min-Jae Choi ,
Eunju Heo ,
Young-Cheon Kim  and
Dongil Kwon
Jong-hyoung Kim*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
Huiwen Xu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
Min-Jae Choi
Affiliation:
Nuclear Materials Division, KAERI (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute), Daejeon 34057, Korea
Eunju Heo
Affiliation:
Center for Multi-scale Testing and Assessment at Combined Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
Young-Cheon Kim*
Affiliation:
Materials Research Center for Energy and Clean Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Andong National University, 1375 Gyeongdong-ro, Andong, Gyeongbuk, 36729, Korea
Dongil Kwon
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: kimyc@anu.ac.kr
Get access

Abstract

We suggest a new method to evaluate stress directionality, the ratio of principal stresses, using nanoindentation by introducing a modified Berkovich indenter that is extended in one direction from the Berkovich indenter. In a nonequibiaxial stress state, the indentation load-depth curves are shifted differently as the extended axis of the indenter is placed in accordance with each principal direction. The indentation load-difference is proportional to each principal stress and the slopes are defined by the normal and parallel conversion factors whose ratio is constant at 0.58. The suggested method was verified by indentation tests using five nonequibiaxial stressed specimens. The evaluated stress directionality results show agreement with the applied reference values within ±20%. Furthermore, we calculated the conversion factor ratios for other modified Berkovich indenters extended to different degrees through finite element analysis and confirmed that the conversion factor ratio was inversely proportional to the extension of the modified Berkovich indenter.

Keywords

nanoindentationstress/strain relationshipmetal
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 33 , Issue 22 , 28 November 2018 , pp. 3849 - 3856
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

b)

This author contributed equally to this work.

References

REFERENCES

Fu, Y., Du, H., Huang, W., Zhang, S., and Hu, M.: TiNi-based thin films in MEMS applications: A review. Sens. Actuators, A 112, 395 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baragetti, S., La Vecchia, G.M., and Terranova, A.: Fatigue behavior and FEM modeling of thin-coated components. Int. J. Fatigue 25, 1229 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jang, J.I.: Estimation of residual stress by instrumented indentation: A review. J. Ceram. Process. Res. 10, 391 (2009).Google Scholar
Suresh, S. and Giannakopoulos, A.E.: A new method for estimating residual stresses by instrumented sharp indentation. Acta Mater. 46, 5755 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, T.Y., Oliver, W.C., and Pharr, G.M.: Influences of stress on the measurement of mechanical properties using nanoindentation. 1. Experimental studies in an aluminum alloy. J. Mater. Res. 11, 752 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolshakov, A., Oliver, W.C., and Pharr, G.M.: Influences of stress on the measurement of mechanical properties using nanoindentation. 2. Finite element simulations. J. Mater. Res. 11, 760 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, S. and Larsson, P.L.: On the determination of residual stress and strain fields by sharp indentation testing: Part I: Theoretical and numerical analysis. Acta Mater. 49, 2179 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, S. and Larsson, P.L.: On the determination of residual stress and strain fields by sharp indentation testing: Part II: Experimental investigation. Acta Mater. 49, 2193 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swadener, J.G., Taljat, B., and Pharr, G.M.: Measurement of residual stress by load and depth sensing indentation with spherical indenters. J. Mater. Res. 16, 2091 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y-H. and Kwon, D.: Measurement of residual-stress effect by nanoindentation on elastically strained (100) W. Scr. Mater. 49, 459 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y-H., Takashima, K., Higo, Y., and Kwon, D.: Prediction of stress directionality from pile-up morphology around remnant indentation. Scr. Mater. 51, 887 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jae-Hwan Han, J-S.L., Lee, Y-H., Choi, M-J., Lee, G., Kim, K-H., and Kwon, D.: Residual stress estimation with identification of stress directionality using instrumented indentation technique. Key Eng. Mater. 345–346, 1125 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, M-J., Kang, S-K., Kang, I., and Kwon, D.: Evaluation of nonequibiaxial residual stress using Knoop indenter. J. Mater. Res. 27, 121 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y-C., Choi, M-J., Kwon, D., and Kim, J-Y.: Estimation of principal directions of Bi-axial residual stress using instrumented Knoop indentation testing. Met. Mater. Int. 21, 850 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahn, H-J., Kim, J-h., Xu, H., Lee, J., Kim, J-Y., Kim, Y-C., and Kwon, D.: Directionality of residual stress evaluated by instrumented indentation testing using wedge indenter. Met. Mater. Int. 23, 465 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASTM E384-17: Standard Test Method for Microindentation Hardness of Materials (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, 2017).Google Scholar
Dukino Rodney, D. and Swain Michael, V.: Comparative measurement of indentation fracture toughness with Berkovich and Vickers indenters. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75, 3299 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y.H., Ji, W.j., and Kwon, D.: Stress measurement of SS400 steel beam using the continuous indentation technique. Exp. Mech. 44, 55 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASTM E494-15: Standard Practice for Measuring Ultrasonic Velocity in Materials (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, 2015).Google Scholar
Giannakopoulos, A.E. and Zisis, T.: Analysis of Knoop indentation. Int. J. Solids Struct. 48, 175 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y-H. and Kwon, D.: Estimation of biaxial surface stress by instrumented indentation with sharp indenters. Acta Mater. 52, 1555 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, L., Ye, D., and Chen, C.: A further study on representative models for calculating the residual stress based on the instrumented indentation technique. Comput. Mater. Sci. 82, 476 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar