Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T20:53:49.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Densification behaviors and piezoelectric properties of MnO2, SiO2-doped Pb(Ni1/3Nb2/3)O3–PbTiO3–PbZrO3 ceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Jong H. Moon
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and Advanced Ceramics Processing Science Laboratory, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang 790-600, Republic of Korea
Hyun M. Jang*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and Advanced Ceramics Processing Science Laboratory, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang 790-600, Republic of Korea
Beoung D. You
Affiliation:
Advanced Technology and Research Center, Agency for Defense Development (ADD), Yusung 305-600, Republic of Korea
*
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Get access

Abstract

The roles of additives (MnO2, SiO2, and CdO) in controlling microstructural development and piezoelectric properties of Pb(Ni1/3Nb2/3)O3– PbTiO3–PbZrO3(PNN–PT–PZ) ceramics were systematically examined. The addition of SiO2 (<1 wt. %) to the pseudoternary PNN–PT-PZ system enhances densification, but suppresses grain growth significantly. On the other hand, the presence of MnO2 expedites the rate of grain growth without increasing the rate of densification appreciably. The observed difference in the grain-growth behavior was discussed in terms of the viscosity of liquid phase formed during sintering and the diffusion-controlled process for the solute-atoms transport. The rapid increase in the mechanical quality factor (Qm) and the decrease in the relative dielectric permittivity (∊r) and d33 for the MnO2-doped specimens indicate the formation of oxygen vacancies by the dissolution of Mn-atoms into the B-sites of perovskite structure. On the contrary, the presence of CdO (2 mol %) remarkably increases ∊r and d33 of PNN–PT–PZ ceramics.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Uchino, K., Ceram. Bull. 65 (4), 647 (1986).Google Scholar
2Uchino, K., Piezoelectric and Electrostrictive Actuators (Morikita Press, Tokyo, Japan, 1986).Google Scholar
3Takahashi, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 19 (4), 771 (1980).Google Scholar
4Wittmer, D. E. and Buchanan, R. C., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 64 (8), 485 (1981).Google Scholar
5Surowiak, Z., Dudek, J., Goltzov, Y. I., Bugajan, LA., and Yurkevich, V. E., J. Mater. Sci. 26, 4407 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Buyanova, E. A., Strelets, P. L., Serova, LA., and Isupov, V. A., Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Phys. Ser. (Engl. Transl.) 29, 1877 (1965).Google Scholar
7Zhilun, G., Longtu, L., Suhua, G., and Xiaowen, Z., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72 (3), 486 (1989).Google Scholar
8Swartz, S. L. and Shrout, T. R., Mater. Res. Bull. XVII, 1245 (1982).Google Scholar
9Cahn, J. W., in Crystal Growth, edited by Peiser, H. S. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1967), pp. 681690.Google Scholar
10Ardell, A. J., Acta Metall. 20, 61 (1972).Google Scholar
11Kaysser, W. A. and Petzow, G., in Emergent Process Methods for High-Technology Ceramics, Mater. Sci. Res., edited by Davis, R. F., Palmour, H. III, and Porter, R. L. (Plenum Press, New York and London, 1984), Vol. 17, pp. 225231.Google Scholar
12Jaffe, B., Piezoelectric Ceramics (Academic Press, New York, 1971), Chap. 10.Google Scholar
13Kulcsar, F., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 42 (7), 343 (1959).Google Scholar
14Moon, J. H. and Jang, H. M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76 (2), 549 (1993).Google Scholar
15Hennings, D. and Pomplun, H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 57 (12), 527 (1974).Google Scholar
16Ng, Y. S. and Alexander, S. M., Ferroelectrics 51, 81 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Takahashi, M., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 9 (10), 1236 (1970).Google Scholar