Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T03:36:51.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Corrosion behavior of 2198 Al–Cu–Li alloy in different aging stages in 3.5 wt% NaCl aqueous solution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

Yanlong Zou
Affiliation:
The State Key Laboratory of Refractories and Metallurgy, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
Xia Chen
Affiliation:
The State Key Laboratory of Refractories and Metallurgy, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
Bin Chen*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: steelboy@sjtu.edu.cn
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, corrosion behavior of 2198 Al–Cu–Li alloy in different aging stages is investigated using immersion and electrochemical measurements in 3.5 wt% NaCl aqueous solution. The corrosion resistance is found to decrease from the solution-anneal to the peak-aged condition but increase after the peak-aged, which is due to microstructure evolution of three main kinds of precipitating phases with the aging process: T1 (Al2CuLi), θ′ (Al2Cu), and a few δ′ (Al3Li) phases. The anode T1 phase grows and increases with the aging treatment and becomes nearly unchanged after the peak-aged. Moreover, the cathode θ′ phase slightly decreases in the over-aged. The potentiodynamic polarization curves also indicate the most positive corrosion potential and the lowest corrosion current density in the peak-aged. The results of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy are in agreement with the corrosion morphologies. Furthermore, the related equivalent circuit is established to investigate the corrosion mechanism of this alloy.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Contributing Editor: Jürgen Eckert

References

REFERENCES

Ahmed, B. and Wu, S.J.: Aluminum lithium alloys (Al–Li–Cu–X)-new generation material for aerospace applications. Appl. Mech. Mater. 440, 104 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrick, D.M., Hogg, S.C., and Wilcox, G.D.: Corrosion of an advanced Al–Cu–Li alloy for aerospace applications. Mater. Sci. Forum 765, 629 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goebel, J., Ghidini, T., and Graham, A.J.: Stress-corrosion cracking characterisation of the advanced aerospace Al–Li 2099-T86 alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A. 673, 16 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jata, K.V., Hopkins, A.K., and Rioja, R.J.: The anisotropy and texture of Al–Li alloys. Mater. Sci. Forum 217, 647 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, U.: Advanced weldable high-strength Al–Cu–Li alloy for aerospace applications. Mater. Sci. Forum 242, 243 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rioja, R.J.: Fabrication methods to manufacture isotropic Al–Li alloys and products for space and aerospace applications. Mater. Sci. Eng., A. 257, 100 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kai, P.W.: Local chemistry and growth of single corrosion pits in aluminum. J. Electrochem. Soc. 137, 3010 (1990).Google Scholar
Soboyejo, W.O. and Srivatsan, T.S.: Advanced Structural Materials: Properties, Design Optimization, and Applications (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araullo-Peters, V., Gault, B., Geuser, F.D., Deschamps, A., and Cairney, J.M.: Microstructural evolution during ageing of Al–Cu–Li–X alloys. Acta Mater. 66, 199 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, B., Guo, M.F., Zheng, J.X., Zhang, K.Y., Fan, Y., Zhou, L.Y., Li, X.L., and Lu, C.: The effect of thermal exposure on the microstructures and mechanical properties of 2198 Al–Li alloy. Adv. Eng. Mater. 18, 1225 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decreus, B., Deschamps, A., Geuser, F.D., Donnadieu, P., Sigli, C., and Weyland, M.: The influence of Cu/Li ratio on precipitation in Al–Cu–Li–x alloys. Acta Mater. 61, 2207 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germer, J.J., Zein, N.N., Metwally, M.A., Hoskin, T.L., Harmsen, W.S., Smith, T.F., and Patel, R.: The influence of precipitation on plastic deformation of Al–Cu–Li alloys. Acta Mater. 61, 4010 (2013).Google Scholar
Wang, S.C. and Starink, M.J.: Precipitates and intermetallic phases in precipitation hardening Al–Cu–Mg–(Li) based alloys. Int. Mater. Rev. 50, 193 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, S.F., Zeng, W.D., Yang, W.H., Shi, C.L., and Wang, H.J.: Ageing response of a Al–Cu–Li 2198 alloy. Mater. Des. 63, 368 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birbilis, N. and Buchheit, R.G.: Electrochemical characteristics of intermetallic phases in aluminum alloys—An experimental survey and discussion. J. Electrochem. Soc. 152, 467 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J.F., Zheng, Z.Q., Li, S.C., Chen, W.J., Ren, W.D., and Zhao, X.S.: Simulation study on function mechanism of some precipitates in localized corrosion of Al alloys. Corros. Sci. 49, 2436 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu-Xuan, D.U., Zhang, X.M., Ling-Ying, Y.E., and Liu, S.D.: Evolution of grain structure in AA2195 Al–Li alloy plate during recrystallization. Trans. Nonferrous Metals Soc. 16, 321 (2006).Google Scholar
Hong-Ying, L.I., Yi, T., Zeng, Z.D., and Feng, Z.: Exfoliation corrosion of T6- and T8-aged AlxCuyLiz alloy. Trans. Nonferrous Metals Soc. 18, 778 (2008).Google Scholar
Proton, V., Alexis, J., Andrieu, E., Delfosse, J., Deschamps, A., Geuser, F.D., Lafont, M.C., and Blanc, C.: The influence of artificial ageing on the corrosion behaviour of a 2050 aluminium–copper–lithium alloy. Corros. Sci. 80, 494 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X.H., Wang, J.H., Yue, X., and Gao, Y.: Effect of aging treatment on the exfoliation corrosion and stress corrosion cracking behaviors of 2195 Al–Li alloy. Mater. Des. 67, 596 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X., Zhou, X., Hashimoto, T., Liu, B., Luo, C., Sun, Z., Tang, Z., Lu, F. and Ma, Y.: Corrosion Behaviour of 2A97-T6 Al-Cu-Li alloy: the Influence of Non-uniform Precipitation. Corros. Sci. 132, 1 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, H., Sugahara, K., Yamamoto, A., and Tsubakino, H.: Corrosion rate of magnesium and its alloys in buffered chloride solutions. Corros. Sci. 44, 603 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathaudhu, S.N., Luo, A.A., Neelameggham, N.R., Nyberg, E.A., and Sillekens, W.H.: An Hydrogen Evolution Method for the Estimation of the Corrosion Rate of Magnesium Alloys (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey, US, 2001); p. 255.Google Scholar
Ahmadi, S., Arabi, H., and Shokuhfar, A.: Formation mechanisms of precipitates in an Al–Cu–Li–Zr alloy and their effects on strength and electrical resistance of the alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 484, 90 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Z., Zhao, K., and Fan, L.: Combinative hardening effects of precipitation in a commercial aged Al–Cu–Li–X alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A. 588, 59 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J.C. and Ardell, A.J.: Crystal structure and stability of, precipitates in aged Al–Li–Cu alloys. Mater. Sci. Technol. 3, 176 (1987).Google Scholar
Crozier, T.E. and Yamamoto, S.: Solubility of hydrogen in water, seawater, and NaCl solutions. J. Chem. Eng. Data 19, 242 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreto, J.A., Marino, C.E.B., Filho, W.W.B., Rocha, L.A., and Fernandes, J.C.S.: SVET, SKP and EIS study of the corrosion behaviour of high strength Al and Al–Li alloys used in aircraft fabrication. Corros. Sci. 84, 30 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queiroz, F.M., Bugarin, A.F.S., Hammel, N.P., Capelossi, V.R., Terada, M., and Costa, I.: EIS behavior of anodized and primer coated AA2198–T851 compared to AA2024–T3 exposed to salt spray CASS test. Surf. Interface Anal. 48, 755 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin-feng, L., Wen-jing, C., Xu-shan, Z., Wen-da, R., and Zi-qiao, Z.: Corrosion behavior of 2195 and 1420 Al–Li alloys in neutral 3.5% NaCl solution under tensile stress. Trans. Nonferrous Metals Soc. 16, 1171 (2006).Google Scholar
Conde, A. and Damborenea, J.D.: Electrochemical modelling of exfoliation corrosion behaviour of 8090 alloy. Electrochim. Acta 43, 849 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conde, A. and Damborenea, J.D.: Evaluation of exfoliation susceptibility by means of the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Corros. Sci. 42, 1363 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar