Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T20:29:50.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Correlation between Ni3Sn4 intermetallics and Ni3P due to solder reaction-assisted crystallization of electroless Ni–P metallization in advanced packages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

K. C. Hung
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Tat chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Y. C. Chan
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Tat chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong
C. W. Tang
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Tat chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong
H. C. Ong
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Tat chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Get access

Abstract

Ni3Sn4 intermetallic was formed by the depletion of Ni from electroless Ni–P, and a Ni3P layer was formed simultaneously due to solder reaction-assisted crystallization during solder reflow. Both Ni3Sn4 and Ni3P grew rapidly due to the solder reaction-assisted crystallization and their growth was diffusion controlled during the first 15 min of annealing at 220 °C. After that, the growth rate of Ni3Sn4 was greatly reduced and the crystallization of electroless Ni–P to Ni3P was no longer induced. Based on kinetic data and scanning electron microscope morphology observations, underlying mechanisms causing this specific phenomenon are proposed. This finding is indeed very crucial since we may control the growth of Ni–Sn intermetallics by monitoring the solder reaction-assisted crystallization of electroless Ni–P.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Semiconductor Industry Association, Semiconductor Technology Workshop Working Group Reports (Semiconductor Research Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1992).Google Scholar
2.Tummala, R.R. and Rymaszewski, E.J., Microelectronics Packaging Handbook (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1989).Google Scholar
3.Seraphim, D., Lasky, R., and Li, C.Y., Principles of Electronic Packaging (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Chan, Y.C., So, A.C.K, and Lai, J.K.L, Mat. Sci. Eng. B 55, 5 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Chan, Y.C., Tu, P.L., So, A.C.K, and Lai, J.K.L, IEEE Trans. on CPMT, Part B 20, 463 (1997).Google Scholar
6.So, A.C.K, Chan, Y.C., and Lai, J.K.L, IEEE Trans. on CPMT, Part B 20, 161 (1997).Google Scholar
7.Kim, H.K., Liou, H.K., and Tu, K.N., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 2337 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Kim, H.K. and Tu, K.N., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 2002 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Liu, C.Y., Chen, C., Mal, A.K., and Tu, K.N., J. Appl. Phys. 85, 3882 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Kay, P.J. and Mackay, C.A., Trans. Inst. Met. Fin. 54, 68 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Tompkins, H.G. and Pinnel, M.R., J. Appl. Phys. 48, 3144 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Chang, C.A., J. Appl. Phys. 60, 1220 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Riedel, W., Electroless Nickel Plating (Finishing Publications, Stevenage, United Kingdom, 1991).Google Scholar
14.Jang, J.W., Kim, P.G., Tu, K.N., Frear, D.R., and Thompson, P., J. Appl. Phys. 85, 8456 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Lin, K.L. and Jang, J.M., Mat. Chem. Phys. 38, 33 (1994).Google Scholar
16.Allen, R.M. and VanderSande, J.B., Scripta Metal. 16, 1161 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Li, H., Chen, H.Y., Dong, S.Z., Yang, J.S., and Deng, J.F., Appl. Surf. Sci. 125, 115 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Crank, J., The Mathematics of Diffusion (Oxford University Press, London, United Kingdom, 1970), p. 48.Google Scholar
19.Peter Haasen, Physical Metallurgy (Cambridge University Press, London, United Kingdom, 1986), p. 377.Google Scholar