Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T12:16:46.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Combustion-synthesized functionally gradient refractory materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Scott E. Niedzialek
Affiliation:
Institute for Self-Propagating High-Temperature Synthesis, New York State College of Ceramics, Alfred, New York 14802
Gregory C. Stangle
Affiliation:
Institute for Self-Propagating High-Temperature Synthesis, New York State College of Ceramics, Alfred, New York 14802
Yoshinari Kaieda
Affiliation:
National Research Institute for Metals, 2-3-12 Nakameguro, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Functionally Gradient Materials (FGM's) are soon to be used in a variety of important commercial applications; joining and thermal barrier coatings are two of the most widely studied. FGM's of the TiC/NiAl and the TiC/Ni3Al systems were fabricated using a one-step, self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS) and densification method. It was observed that ignition of the starting mixture for these two systems was affected by the initial sample temperature and the external pressure that was applied to the sample during the ignition stage. Quality of the final product (e.g., porosity, grain size, cracking and microcracking, etc.) depends on a number of factors during this one-step operation. Reaction temperature control is important and is necessary to minimize residual porosity of the final product. Particle size of reactant powders, as well as applied pressure, also has an effect on the resulting microstructure. If careful reaction temperature control is achieved, along with optimum reactant powder size and applied pressure, an FGM of minimal porosity is obtained without residual macrocracks. Further, this method can easily be used to fabricate an FGM with a highly precise composition and material properties gradient. Finally, this process results in FGM's of similar quality when compared to those prepared by existing fabrication methods at only a fraction of the cost. Most importantly, it is expected that this process can be scaled up with relative ease.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Shepard, L.M., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 71 (4), 617631 (1992).Google Scholar
2Ford, R.G., Mater. Processing Report 7 (3–4), 15 (1992).Google Scholar
3Proceedings of the First International Symposium, FGM '90, edited by Yamanouchi, M., Koizumi, M., Hirai, T., and Shiota, I., Sendai, Japan, October 1990.Google Scholar
4Combustion and Plasma Synthesis of High Temperature Materials, edited byMunir, Z. A. and Holt, J. B. (VCH Publishers, Inc., New York, 1990).Google Scholar
5Atarashiya, K., Kurokawa, K., and Tadao, N., Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 13 (7–8), 400407 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Munir, Z.A., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 67 (2), 342349 (1988).Google Scholar
7Merzhanov, A. G., in Combustion and Plasma Synthesis of High Temperature Materials, edited by Munir, Z. A. and Holt, J. B. (VCH Publishers, Inc., New York, 1990), pp. 153.Google Scholar
8Carnahan, B., Luther, H. A., and Wilkes, J. O., Applied Numerical Methods (John Wiley, New York, 1969).Google Scholar
9and, Z.A. MunirAnselmi-Tamburini, U., Mater. Sci. Rep. 3 (7–8), 277365 (1989).Google Scholar
10Mullins, M. and Riley, E., J. Mater. Res. 4, 408411 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Dunmead, S.D. and Munir, Z.A., J. Mater. Sci. 26, 24102416 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Kudesia, R., Niedzialek, S. E., Stangle, G. C., McCauley, J. W., and Spriggs, R. M., Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 13 (7–8), 374383 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Niedzialek, S., M. S. Thesis, Alfred University (1993).Google Scholar