Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T04:31:08.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of the interfacial strength of SiNx/GaAs film/substrate systems using energy balance in nanoindentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2013

Hongtao Xie
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, The Faculty of Engineering, Architecture and Information Technology, The University of Queensland, Queensland 4072, Australia
Han Huang*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, The Faculty of Engineering, Architecture and Information Technology, The University of Queensland, Queensland 4072, Australia
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: han.huang@uq.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

The linear elastic recovery measured from the nanoindentation unloading curve of a film/substrate system was used to determine the practical work for delamination using the proposed energy balance method and to estimate the delaminated area using the Hertz contact loaded model. The practical work for delamination was then calculated by dividing the external mechanical work required for generating interfacial crack by the delaminated area. The finite element model simulation demonstrated that the energy method was feasible and the estimation of delamination area using the Hertz model was accurate. The practical works for delamination in the plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition SiNx/GaAs film/substrate systems estimated using this method were in the range of 1–2.3 J/m2, which were in reasonably good agreement with those obtained from our another experimental approach.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Huang, H., Winchester, K.J., Suvorova, A., Lawn, B.R., Liu, Y., Hu, X.Z., Dell, J.M., and Faraone, L.: Effect of deposition conditions on mechanical properties of low-temperature PECVD silicon nitride films. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 435, 453 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriese, M.D., Gerberich, W.W., and Moody, N.R.: Quantitative adhesion measures of multilayer films: Part II. Indentation of W/Cu, W/W, Cr/W. J. Mater. Res. 14, 3019 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malzbender, J. and With, G.D.: Energy dissipation, fracture toughness and the indentation load–displacement curve of coated materials. Surf. Coat. Technol. 135, 60 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkataraman, S., Kohlstedt, D., and Gerberich, W.: Continuous microscratch measurements of the practical and true works of adhesion for metal/ceramic systems. J. Mater. Res. 11(12), 3133 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volinsky, A., Moody, N., and Gerberich, W.: Interfacial toughness measurements for thin films on substrates. Acta Mater. 50(3), 441 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, S., Wang, Y.S., Zeng, X.T., Khor, K.A., Weng, W., and Sun, D.E.: Evaluation of adhesion strength and toughness of fluoridated hydroxyapatite coatings. Thin Solid Films 516, 5162 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsson, R.: Measurement of the adhesion of thin films. Thin Solid Films 34(2), 191 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegemann, D., Brunner, H., and Oehr, C.: Plasma treatment of polymers for surface and adhesion improvement. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 208, 281 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., Kim, K.S., and Kim, Y.H.: Mechanical effects in peel adhesion test. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 3(1), 175 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauskardt, R.H., Lane, M., Ma, Q., and Krishna, N.: Adhesion and debonding of multi-layer thin film structures. Eng. Fract. Mech. 61(1), 141 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litteken, C., Dauskardt, R., Scherban, T., Xu, G., Leu, J., Gracias, D., and Sun, B.: Interfacial adhesion of thin-film patterned interconnect structures. In Interconnect Technology Conference, 2003. Proceedings of the IEEE 2003 International (IEEE, New York, 2003); p. 168.Google Scholar
Marshall, D.B. and Evans, A.G.: Measurement of adherence of residually stressed thin films by indentation. I. Mechanics of interface delamination. J. Appl. Phys. 56(10), 2632 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, A. and Hutchinson, J.: On the mechanics of delamination and spalling in compressed films. Int. J. Solid. Struct. 20(5), 455 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hara, S., Kumagai, T., Izumi, S., and Sakai, S.: Multiscale analysis on the onset of nanoindentation-induced delamination: Effect of high-modulus Ru overlayer. Acta Mater. 57(14), 4209 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, B., Zhao, M.H., and Zhang, T.Y.: Indentation fracture and indentation delamination in ZnO film/Si substrate systems. Philos. Mag. 84(12), 1233 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X.: Fracture mechanisms of thin amorphous carbon films in nanoindentation. Acta Mater. 45(11), 4453 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J. and Bull, S.J.: Approaches to investigate delamination and interfacial toughness in coated systems: An overview. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 44(304001), 1 (2011).Google Scholar
Abdul-Baqi, A. and Giessen, E.V.D.: Delamination of a strong film from a ductile substrate during indentation unloading. J. Mater. Res. 16, 1396 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L., Yeap, K.B., She, C.M., and Liu, G.R.: A computational and experimental investigation of three-dimensional micro-wedge indentation-induced interfacial delamination in a soft-film-on-hard-substrate system. Eng. Struct. 33 (12), 3269 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X. and Zhang, S.: Rethinking the role that the “step” in the load–displacement curves can play in measurement of fracture toughness for hard coatings. Thin Solid Films 520(9), 3423 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, W. and Siegmund, T.: An analysis of the indentation test to determine the interface toughness in a weakly bonded thin film coating – substrate system. Acta Mater. 52(10), 29892999 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J. and Bull, S.J.: Indentation fracture and toughness assessment for thin optical coatings on glass. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40(18), 5401 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainsworth, S.V., McGurk, M.R., and Page, T.F.: The effect of coating cracking on the indentation response of thin hard-coated systems. Surf. Coat. Technol. 102, 97 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, M., Xie, H., Huang, H., Zou, J., and He, Y.: Indentation-induced delamination of plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition silicon nitride film on gallium arsenide substrate. J. Mater. Res. 28(8), 1047 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toondera, J.D.: Fracture toughness and adhesion energy of sol-gel coatings. J. Mater. Res. 17(1), 224 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, M.: Interface fracture. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 33(1), 29 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shet, C. and Chandra, N.: Analysis of energy balance when using cohesive zone models to simulate fracture processes. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 124(4), 440 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawn, B.R.: Fracture of Brittle Solids (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, P.J., Liang, W.L., Ai, C.F., and Lin, J.F.: A new method for determining the strain energy release rate of an interface via force–depth data of nanoindentation tests. Nanotechnology 20(2), 025701 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, O.N., Begley, M.R., Komaragiri, U., and Mackin, T.J.: Indentation of freestanding circular elastomer films using spherical indenters. Acta Mater. 52(16), 4877 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, J., Chou, Y.K., and Thompson, R.G.: Cohesive zone effects on coating failure evaluations of diamond-coated tools. Surf. Coat. Technol. 203(5–7), 730 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, Z.H. and Sun, C.T.: Cohesive zone modeling of interface fracture in elastic bi-materials. Eng. Fract. Mech. 72(12), 1805 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouyang, Z. and Li, G.: Cohesive zone model based analytical solutions for adhesively bonded pipe joints under torsional loading. Int. J. Solid. Struct. 46(5), 1205 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needleman, A.: A continuum model for void nucleation by inclusion debonding. J. Appl. Mech. 54, 525 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANSYS Academic Research Release 13.0, Help System, 4.13. Cohesive Zone Material Model (ANSYS, Inc., 2007).Google Scholar
Lu, M. and Huang, H.: Determination of the energy release rate in the interfacial delamination of SiN/GaAs bi-layers via nanoindentation. J. Mater. Res. Submitted.Google Scholar