Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T07:50:37.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analytical and mechanical evaluation of diamond films on silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

D. E. Peebles
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185
L. E. Pope
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185
Get access

Abstract

A diamond film commercially deposited on a 10 cm diameter silicon wafer has been evaluated by a variety of analytical and mechanical procedures. The film is nominally 2.5 μm thick and is very smooth with a surface roughness of only 28.1 nm, as measured by atomic force microscopy. The grain size is very small, with grains from 10 nm to about 100 nm in diameter. A sharp diamond diffraction pattern is obtained across at least 98% of the surface area, as measured by transmission electron diffraction. Raman spectra show a strong diamond band at 1330 cm−1, as well as a strong graphite band at 1580 cm−1. Additional bands are seen near 1500 cm−1 and 1200 cm−1 and are attributed to non-diamond, non-graphite carbon and to macrocrystalline diamond, respectively. Intensity in the graphite band decreases toward the outer edge of the wafer. Elastic recoil detection shows the bulk hydrogen content of the film to range from 1 at.% near the edge of the wafer to 3 at.% near the center. The film is considerably harder than the silicon substrate and is highly adherent. During acoustic emission scratch adhesion testing, the film exhibits a critical load for failure of 11.2 N. At this load the film spalls from the substrate, at the film interface. Almost 50% of the scratch tests also show limited local failure (partial film loss) at a critical load of 2.6 N. Both failure modes may be similar to cohesive failure modes in the underlying silicon substrate which shows critical loads of 4.1 and 10.0 N. The separate failure loads may be related to processes with different friction coefficients.

Type
Diamond and Diamond-Like Materials
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 “Diamond Films: Evaluating the Technology and Opportunities,” Emerging Technologies number 25 (Technical Insights, Inc., Englewood/Fort Lee, NJ, 1987).Google Scholar
2Spear, K. E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72, 171 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Field, J. E., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. No. 75, Chapter 3, presented at 2nd Conf. Sci. Hard Mater. (Rhodes, September 23–28, 1984), p. 181.Google Scholar
4Samuels, B. and Wilks, J., J. Mater. Sci. 23, 2846 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Purchased from Crystallume Corporation, Menlo Park, CA.Google Scholar
6Gardos, M. N. and Ravi, K.V., Proc. 1st Int. Symp. on Diamond and Diamond-like Films, Electrochem. Soc. (May 7–12, 1989, Los Angeles, CA), paper #115.Google Scholar
7Pinneo, M., Crystallume Corporation, Menlo Park, CA (personal communication).Google Scholar
8Nemanich, R. J., Glass, J.T., Lucovsky, G., and Shroder, R. E., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A6, 1783 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Knight, D. S. and White, W. B., J. Mater. Res. 4, 385 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Seki, H., Surface and Coatings Technol. 37, 161 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Doyle, B. L. and Peercy, P. S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 34, 811 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Schmale, D.T., Bourcier, R. J., and Martinez, E., Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND86–0509 (April 1986).Google Scholar
13Steinmann, P. A., Tardy, Y., and Hintermann, H. E., Thin Solid Films 154, 333 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Valli, J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A4, 3007 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Bull, S. J., Rickerby, D.S., Matthews, A., Leyland, A., Pace, A.R., and Valli, J., Surface and Coatings Technol. 36, 503 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Scaglione, S. and Emiliani, G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A7, 2303 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Burnett, P. J. and Rickerby, D. S., Thin Solid Films 154, 403 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Perry, A. J., Thin Solid Films 107, 167 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar