Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T14:52:58.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An embedded atom analysis of Au and Pt substitutional atoms in Ni

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

P. Ruppa*
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Applied Science, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052
C. M. Gilmore
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Applied Science, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052
*
a)Present address: Universitat Stuttgart, Stuttgart, West Germany.
Get access

Abstract

The Embedded Atom Model (EAM) was utilized to analyze the energy and strain surrounding Au and Pt atoms substituted into a Ni crystal. Au substituted into Ni has a large positive size difference and a positive heat of mixing; Pt substituted into Ni has a large positive size difference and a negative heat of mixing. The EAM predicted highly anisotropic strain fields around the substitutional atom with large positive strains in the [110] direction and small or negative strains in the [100] and [111] directions. This is in contrast to the normal assumption that the strain around a substitution atom is spherically symmetric. The cohesive energy of the atoms around the substitutional atom was found to depend upon the crystallographic direction relative to the substitutional atom in addition to the radial distance from the substitutional atom. The EAM predicted an energy increase for Au substituted into Ni and an energy decrease for Pt substituted into Ni. The EAM results were compared with an elastic analysis.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Eshelby, J. D.J. Appl. Phys. 25 255 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Eshelby, J. D.Solid State Physics 3 79 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Friedel, J.Advances in Physics 3 446 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Daw, M. S. and Baskes, M. I.Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 1285 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Daw, M. S. and Baskes, M. I.Phys. Rev. B29 6443 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Foiles, S.M.Baskes, M.I. and Daw, M.S.Phys. Rev. B33 7983 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Clementi, E. and Roetti, C.At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 14 177 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8McLean, A. D. and McLean, R. S.At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 26 197 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Sinclair, J.E. and Fletcher, R.J. Phys. C7 864 (1972).Google Scholar
10Averbach, B. L.Flinn, P. A. and Cohen, M.Acta Metall. 2 92 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Hultgren, R.Desai, P. D.Hawkins, D. T.Gleiser, M. and Kelley, K. K.Selected Values of the Thermodynamic Properties of Binary Alloys, ASM, Metals Park, OH (1973).Google Scholar
12Hansen, M.Constitution of Binary Alloys (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Simmons, G. and Wang, H.Single Crystal Elastic Constants and Calculated Aggregate Properties, A Handbook (M.I.T. Press Cambridge, MA, 1971).Google Scholar