Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T06:32:40.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What type of labor lies behind the on-demand economy? New research based on workers’ data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2018

Santiago Melián-González Open the ORCID record for Santiago Melián-González [Opens in a new window]  and
Jacques Bulchand-Gidumal
Santiago Melián-González*
Affiliation:
TIDES Institute of Tourism and Sustainable Development, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Facultad de Economía, Empresa y Turismo, Campus Universitario de Tafira, Las Palmas, Spain
Jacques Bulchand-Gidumal
Affiliation:
TIDES Institute of Tourism and Sustainable Development, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Facultad de Economía, Empresa y Turismo, Campus Universitario de Tafira, Las Palmas, Spain
*
*Corresponding author. Email: santiago.melian@ulpgc.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

On-demand and gig economy are names commonly used when discussing issues related to labor in the collaborative economy. Some of the specific digital platforms in this economy, including Uber and TaskRabbit, and Upwork are quite popular. The term digital labor market has been suggested to distinguish the work mediated by these platforms from that of the traditional labor market. The theoretical work conditions and characteristics of this digital labor market are similar to those of negative nonstandard work arrangements. However, more empirical evidence is required because most of the findings about work conditions are based on anecdotal evidence and the analysis of the platforms’ rules. This study collects the characteristics commonly attributed to the digital labor market and analyzes them based on data about 465 workers extracted from two important digital labor platforms. Our results confirm and refine some of the beliefs found in the literature.

Keywords

on-demand economygig economysharing economycollaborative economynonstandard employment
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 27 , Issue 5 , September 2021 , pp. 850 - 866
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aloisi, A (2016). Commoditized workers. Case study research on labour law issues arising from a set of ‘on-demand/gig economy’ platforms. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 37(3), 653–684.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J (1984). Manpower strategies for flexible organizations. Personnel Management 16(8), 28–31.Google Scholar
Berg, J (2016). Income security in the on-demand economy: Findings and policy lessons from a survey of crowdworkers, International Labour Organization. Geneva. Retrieved February 18, 2017, from http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---travail/documents/publication/wcms_479693.pdf Google Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2017). May 2016 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates. USA. Retrieved May 10, 2018, from http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm Google Scholar
Cochrane, R, & McKeown, T (2015). Vulnerability and agency work: From the workers’ perspectives. International Journal of Manpower 36(6), 947–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Codagnone, C, Abadie, F, & Biagi, F (2016). The Future of Work in the ‘Sharing Economy’. Market Efficiency and Equi Opportunities or Unfair Precarisation? (JRC Science for Policy Report EUR 27913 EN). Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Retrieved June 22, 2016, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2784774 Google Scholar
Davis, GF (2015). What might replace the modern corporation: Uberization and the web page enterprise. Seattle University Law Review 39, 501–515.Google Scholar
De Groen, WP, Maselli, I, & Fabo, B (2016). The Digital Market for Local Services: A one night stand for workers? (CEPS Special Report No. 133). Retrieved July 18, 2016, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2766220 Google Scholar
De Stefano, VD (2016). The Rise of the ‘just-in-time workforce’: On-demand work, crowdwork and labour protection in the ‘gig-economy’. International Labour Office Conditions of Work and Employment Series. Geneve. Retrieved January 12, 2017, from https://ecampus.itcilo.org/pluginfile.php/25267/mod_page/content/35/Conditions%20of%20Work%20and%20Employment%20Series%20No.%2071.pdf Google Scholar
Doeringer, PP, & Piore, MJM (1971). Internal labor markets and manpower analysis. New York: D.C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
Drahokoupil, J, & Fabo, B (2016). The platform economy and the disruption of the employment relationship. ETUI Policy Brief, 5, 1–6. Retrieved May 14, 2018, from https://www.etui.org/Publications2/Policy-Briefs Google Scholar
Elance-Odesk. (2014). The many faces of work fulfillment. Retrieved January 12, 2016, from https://blog-static.odesk.com/content/Elance-oDeskAnnualImpactReport2014.pdf Google Scholar
European Commission (2016). A European agenda for the collaborative economy. Retrieved September 20, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/16881 Google Scholar
Gheorghe, M (2015). State of freelancing in IT and future trends. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 9(5), 1434–1438.Google Scholar
Goldin, C, & Katz, L (2009). The race between education and technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, M, Hjorth, I, & Lehdonvirta, V (2017). Digital labour and development: Impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 135–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, JV, & Krueger, AB (2015). An analysis of the labor market for Uber’s driver-partners in the United States. Retrieved January 16, 2016, from https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/1507970/uberstudy.pdf Google Scholar
Horemans, J (2016). Polarisation of non-standard employment in Europe: Exploring a missing piece of the inequality puzzle. Social Indicators Research, 125(1), 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, S, Hsu, CH, & Chan, A (2010). Tour guide performance and tourist satisfaction: A study of the package tours in Shanghai. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 34(1), 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, K (2007). The new labor market segmentation: Labor market dualism in the new economy. Social Science Research, 36(1), 286–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huws, U (2015). iCapitalism and the cybertariat: Contradictions of the digital economy. Monthly Review, 66(8), 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huws, U (2016). Platform labour: Sharing economy or virtual wild west. Journal for a Progressive Economy, 1, 24–27.Google Scholar
Huws, U, Spencer, NH, & Syrdal, DS (2018). Online, on call: The spread of digitally organised just‐in‐time working and its implications for standard employment models. New Technology, Work and Employment, 33(2), 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, E (2015). Innovative clusters and new work: A case study of TaskRabbit, Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy (BBRIE Working Paper 2015-2). Retrieved January 12, 2016, from http://www.brie.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Innovative-Clusters-New-Work.pdf Google Scholar
Jepsen, AL (2007). Factors affecting consumer use of the Internet for information search. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(3), 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalleberg, AL (2003). Flexible firms and labor market segmentation: Effects of workplace restructuring on jobs and workers. Work and Occupations, 30(2), 154–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalleberg, AL, & Dunn, M (2016). Good jobs, bad jobs in the gig economy. Perspectives on Work, 20, 10–14. Retrieved May 24, 2018, from http://lerachapters.org/OJS/ojs-2.4.4-1/index.php/PFL/article/viewFile/3112/3087 Google Scholar
Katz, LF, & Krueger, AB (2016). The rise and nature of alternative work arrangements in the United States, 1995-2015. (National Bureau of Economic Research, No. w22667). Retrieved January 12, 2017, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w22667 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketchen, DJ Jr., & Shook, CL (1996). The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: An analysis and critique. Strategic Management Journal, 17(6), 441–458.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiang, MY, Raghu, TS, & Shang, KHM (2000). Marketing on the internet—who can benefit from an online marketing approach? Decision Support Systems, 27(4), 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, P (2016). Professional self-employment, new power and the sharing economy: Some cautionary tales from Uber. Journal of Management & Organization, 22(6), 859–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehdonvirta, V (2017). The online gig economy grew 26% over the past year. Retrieved July 20, 2017, from http://ilabour.oii.ox.ac.uk/the-online-gig-economy-grew-26-over-the-past-year/ Google Scholar
Maselli, I, & Fabo, B (2015). Digital workers by design? An example from the on-demand economy (CEPS Working Document No. 414/October 2015). Retrieved January 12, 2016, from http://aei.pitt.edu/68757/ Google Scholar
Noguera Vivo, JM, Martínez Sánchez, J, Nicolás Ojeda, MÁ, Pérez Escolar, M, Grandío Pérez, MDM, Hernández Gómez, F, & Sánchez Cobarro, PDH (2014). Economía de la Participación. Madrid: Fundación EOI.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2016). Working party on measurement and analysis of the digital economy. New forms of work in the digital economy. OECD. Retrieved July 20, 2017, from http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=DSTI/ICCP/IIS(2015)13/FINAL&docLanguage=En Google Scholar
Rozin, P, & Royzman, EB (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, T (Ed.) (2013). Digital labor: The internet as playground and factory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schor, JB (2017). Does the sharing economy increase inequality within the eighty percent?: Findings from a qualitative study of platform providers. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10(2), 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schor, JB, & Attwood‐Charles, W (2017). The ‘sharing’ economy: labor, inequality, and social connection on for‐profit platforms. Sociology Compass, 11(8), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shontell, A (2011). My nightmare experience as a TaskRabbit Drone. Retrieved January 12, 2016, from http://www.businessinsider.com/confessions-of-a-task-rabbit-2011-12 Google Scholar
Slaughter, AM (2015). The gig economy can actually be great for women. Wired. Retrieved January 26, 2016, from http://www.wired.com/2015/10/unfinished-business-women-men-work-family Google Scholar
Sprague, R (2015). Worker (Mis) classification in the sharing economy: Square pegs trying to fit in round holes. Retrieved January 26, 2016, from http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1054&context=robert_sprague CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spreitzer, GM, Cameron, L, & Garrett, L (2017). Alternative work arrangements: Two images of the new world of work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 473–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundararajan, A (2014). Peer-to-peer businesses and the sharing (collaborative) economy: Overview, economic effects and regulatory issues. Written testimony for the hearing titled The Power of Connection: Peer to Peer Businesses. Retrieved January 26, 2016, from http://smbiz.house.gov/uploadedfiles/1-15-2014_revised_sundararajan_testimony.pdf Google Scholar
Sundararajan, A (2016). The sharing economy: The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Todolí-Signes, A (2017). The end of the subordinate worker? The on-demand economy, the gig economy, and the need for protection for crowdworkers. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 33(2), 241–268.Google Scholar
United States Department for Labor (2016). The future of work: Diving into the data. Retrieved July 28, 2017, from https://blog.dol.gov/2016/06/17/the-future-of-work-diving-into-the-data Google Scholar