Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:10:35.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self-oriented forgiveness and other-oriented forgiveness: Shaping high-quality exchange relationships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2016

Bryant Thompson  and
Travis J Simkins
Bryant Thompson*
Affiliation:
Department of Business Administration, John B. Goddard School of Business and Economics, Weber State University, Ogden, UT, USA
Travis J Simkins
Affiliation:
Department of Management and Marketing, University of Wyoming College of Business, Laramie, WY, USA
*
Corresponding author: bryantthompson@weber.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine the effects of two distinct forgiveness motives, self-oriented and other-oriented, on relationship quality within supervisor–subordinate relationships. We provide empirical evidence that both forgiveness motives are positively associated with leader–member exchange and differentially associated with interpersonal citizenship behavior and suggest that previous forgiveness research may be incomplete. We demonstrate that high-quality leader–member relationships and interpersonal citizenship behavior can be enhanced by self-oriented forgiveness motive and other-oriented forgiveness motive. We further show that the association between forgiveness motive and leader–member exchange can be strengthened by one’s disposition, such that proactive personality strengthens the influence of self-oriented forgiveness motive on leader–member exchange and empathic concern strengthens the influence of other-oriented forgiveness motive on leader–member exchange. This manuscript aims to empirically examine two key pathways to forgiveness: one driven by self-orientation and the other driven by other-orientation.

Keywords

forgivenessleader–member exchangeother-orientationand self-orientation
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 23 , Issue 5 , September 2017 , pp. 741 - 765
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1991). Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 732–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquino, K., Grover, S. L., Goldman, B., & Folger, R. (2003). When push doesn’t come to shove: Interpersonal forgiveness in workplace relationships. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagozzi, R. P., & Edwards, J. R. (1998). A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 45–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, W. E., & Bulkley, N. (2014). Paying it forward vs. rewarding reputation: Mechanisms of generalized reciprocity. Organization Science, 25, 1493–1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, M. W. (1997). Relational schemas as a source of if-then self-inference procedures. Review of General Psychology, 1, 326–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, M. W., & Baccus, J. R. (2003). An expectancy-value approach to self-esteem. In S., Spencer, & S., Fein (Eds.), Motivated social perception (pp. 171–194). 9: The Ontario Symposium.Google Scholar
Ballinger, G., & Rockmann, K. (2010). Chutes versus ladders: Anchoring events and a punctuated-equilibrium perspective on social exchange relationships. Academy of Management Review, 35, 373–391.Google Scholar
Bamberger, P. A. (2008). Beyond contextualization: Using context theories to narrow the micro-macro gap in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 839–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bateman., T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In L., Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 65–122). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1538–1567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, M. H. (1993). Fairness, social comparison and irrationality. In J. K., Murnighan (Ed.), Social psychology in organizations (pp. 184–203). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8(3), 274–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkowitz, L. (1972). Social norms, feelings and other factors affecting helping and altruism. In L., Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 63–108). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bolino, M. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors? Academy of Management Review, 24, 82–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bright, D. S., Cameron, K., & Caza, A. (2006). The amplifying and buffering effects of virtuousness in downsized organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bright, D. S., & Exline, J. J. (2012). Forgiveness at four levels: Intrapersonal, relational, organizational and collective-group. In K., Cameron, & G., Spreitzer (Eds.), Handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 244–259). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bright, D. S., Fry, R. E., & Cooperrider, D. L. (2006). Forgiveness from the perspectives of three response modes: Begrudgment, pragmatism and transcendence. In C. C., Manz, K. S., Cameron, K., Manz, & R. D., Marx (Eds.), The virtuous organization (pp. 78–103). NJ: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Bright, D. S., Fry, R. E., & Cooperrider, D. L. (2008). Forgiveness from the perspectives of three response modes: Begrudgment, pragmatism and transcendence. In C. C., Manz, K. S., Cameron, K., Manz, & R. D., Marx (Eds.), The virtuous organization (pp. 67–95). Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bright, D. S., Stansbury, J., Alzola, M., & Stavros, J. M. (2011). Virtue ethics in positive organizational scholarship: An integrative perspective. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 28(3), 231–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. P. (2004). Vengeance is mine: Narcissism, vengeance, and the tendency to forgive. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(6), 576–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1987). Selection, evocation and manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1214–1221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cameron, K. (2005). Positive leadership: Strategies for extraordinary performance. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Cameron, K. (2007). Forgiveness in organizations. In D. L. Nelson, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Positive organizational behavior (pp. 129–142). London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. A. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In N. J., Castellan, Jr. (Ed.), Individual and group decision making: Current issues (pp. 221–246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L.S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business & Psychology, 25, 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, S. S., Bennett, R. J., Tripp, T. M., & Aquino, K. (2012). An empirical test of forgiveness motives’ effects on employees’ health and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17, 330–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26, 435–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. H. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Madison, WI: WCB Brown and Benchmark.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. F., & Richter, A. W. (2006). Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 917–926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of leader–member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38, 1715–1759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, J. E., & Ragins, B. R. E. (2007). Exploring positive relationships at work: Building a theoretical and research foundation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Enright, R. D. (2001). Forgiveness is a choice: A step-by-step process for resolving anger and restoring hope. Washington, DC: APA Life Tools.Google Scholar
Enright, R. D., Freedman, S., & Rique, J. (1998). The psychology of interpersonal forgiveness. In R. D., Enright, & J., North (Eds.), Exploring forgiveness (pp. 150–164). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Enright, R. D., Gassin, E. A., & Wu, C. (1992). Forgiveness: A developmental view. Journal of Moral Education, 2, 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enright, R. D., The Human Development Study Group (1991). The moral development of forgiveness. In W. Kurtines, & J. Gewritz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (pp. 123–152). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Exline, J. J., Worthington, E. L. Jr., Hill, P., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Forgiveness and justice: A research agenda for social and personality psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, S. M., & Aguinis, H. (2005). Accounting for subordinate perceptions of supervisor power: An identity-dependence model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1069–1083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, R., Gelfand, M., & Nag, M. (2010). The road to forgiveness: A meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 894–914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freedman, S. (1998). Forgiveness and reconciliation: The importance of understanding how they differ. Counseling and Values, 42(3), 200–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, S., Enright, R. D., & Knutson, J. (2005). A progress report on the process model of forgiveness. In E. L., Worthington, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 393–406). New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative (PI): An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. In B. M., Staw, & R. M., Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (vol. 23, pp. 133–187). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1994). Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. In H. C., Triandis, M. D., Dunnette, & L., Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (vol. 4, pp. 271–340). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, J. B., & Marler, L. E. (2009). Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75, 329–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galvin, P. (2014). A new vision for the Journal of Management & Organization: The role of context. Journal of Management & Organization, 20, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerstner, C., & Day, D. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghiselli, E. E., Campbell, J. P., & Zedeck, S. (1981). Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Graen, G. B., Novak, M. A., & Sommerkamp, P. (1982). The effects of leader–member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 109–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175–208.Google Scholar
Graen, G. B., & Schiemann, W. (1978). Leader–member agreement: A vertical dyad linkage approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 206–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32, 393–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M. (2013). Give and take: A revolutionary approach to success. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work: Lessons from feedback-seeking and organizational citizenship behavior research. In B. M., Staw, & R. M., Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 28 (pp. 3–34). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Grant, A. M., & Dutton, J. E. (2012). Beneficiary or benefactor: The effects of reflecting about receiving versus giving on prosocial behavior. Psychological Science, 23, 1033–1039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, A. M., & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Role expansion as a persuasion process: The interpersonal influence dynamics of role redefinition. Organizational Psychology Review, 1, 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M., & Patil, S. V. (2012). Challenging the norm of self-interest: Minority influence and transitions to helping norms in work units. Academy of Management Review, 37, 547–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagedoorn, M., Van Yperen, N. W., Van de Vliert, E., & Buunk, A. P. (1999). Employees’ reactions to problematic events: A circumplex structure of five categories of responses and the role of job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 309–321.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmgren, M. R. (1993). Forgiveness and the intrinsic value of persons. American Philosophical Quarterly, 341–352.Google Scholar
Hook, J. N., & Worthington, E. L. Jr. (2008). Decisional and emotional forgiveness: Implications for Christian spirituality and counseling. Transformation, 2, 4–5.Google Scholar
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J., & Morgeson, F. (2007). Leader–member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 269–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A. Jr., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14, 6–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.), New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, M. A., & Meglino, B. M. (2008). Beyond the individualistic self: A framework for prosocial motives and judgments. In H. A., Wayment, & J. J., Bauer (Eds.), Transcending self-interest: Psychological explorations of the quiet ego (pp. 183–195). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, E. J. (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 321–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leavitt, H. (1988). Managerial psychology: Managing behavior in organizations. Chicago, IL: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Maltby, J., Day, L., & Barber, L. (2004). Forgiveness and mental health variables: Interpreting the relationship using an adaptational-continuum model of personality and coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1629–1641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, M. E., Fincham, F. D., & Tsang, J. A. (2003). Forgiveness, forbearance, and time: The temporal unfolding of transgression-related interpersonal motivations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 540–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullough, M. E., & Hoyt, W. T. (2002). Transgression-related motivational dispositions: Personality substrates of forgiveness and their links to the Big Five. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(11), 1556–1573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I., & Thoresen, C. E. (2001). Forgiveness: theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L. Jr., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships II: Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586–1603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullough, M. E., & Worthington, E. L. (1994). Models of interpersonal forgiveness and their applications to counseling: Review and critique. Counseling and Values, 39(1), 2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNeely, B. L., & Meglino, B. M. (1994). The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial behavior: An examination of the intended beneficiaries of prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 836–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeker, B. F. (1971). Decisions and exchange. American Sociological Review, 36, 485–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nahrgang, J. D., Morgeson, F. P., & Ilies, R. (2009). The development of leader–member exchanges: Exploring how personality and performance influence leader and member relationships over time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 256–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, J. (1987). Wrongdoing and forgiveness. Philosophy, 62, 499–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington.Google Scholar
Palanski, M. E. (2012). Forgiveness and reconciliation in the workplace: A multi-level perspective and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 109, 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, E. L. (1993). When to fix it and when to leave: Relationships among perceived control, self-efficacy, dissent and exit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 949–959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36, 827–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. M., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method variance in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruitt, D. G. (1972). Methods for resolving differences of interest: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, H., & Gray, B. (2009). Repairing relationship conflict: How violation types and culture influence the effectiveness of restoration rituals. Academy of Management Review, 34, 105–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Hannon, P. A., Stocker, S. L., & Finkel, E. J. (2005). Forgiveness and relationship repair. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 185–206). New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
Rynes, S., Bartunek, J., Dutton., J., & Margolis, J. (2012). Care and compassion through an organizational lens: Opening up new possibilities. Academy of Management Review, 37, 403–423.Google Scholar
Schein, E. H. (1968). Organizational socialization and the profession of management. Industrial Management Review, 9, l–16.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. W., & Klimoski, R. J. (1991). Research methods in human resource management . Cincinnati, OH: Southwestern Publishers.Google Scholar
Settoon, R. P., & Mossholder, K. W. (2002). Relationship quality and relationship context as antecedents of person-and task-focused interpersonal citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 255–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sparrowe, R. T., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Process and structure in leader-member exchange. The Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 522–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2003). A sociological approach to self and identity. In M. R., Leary, & J. P., Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 128–152). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Strelan, P., & Covic, T. (2006). A review of forgiveness process models and a coping framework to guide future research. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 1059–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangney, J. P., Wagner, P. E., Hill-Barlow, D., Marschall, D. E., & Gramzow, R. (1996). Relation of shame and guilt to constructive versus destructive responses to anger across the lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 797–809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thibaut, J., & Kelley, H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. Oxford, England: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. A., & Bunderson, J. S. (2003). Violations of principle: Ideological currency in the psychological contract. Academy of Management Review, 28, 571–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhl-Bien, M., & Maslyn, J. M. (2003). Reciprocity in manager-subordinate relationships: Components, configurations and outcomes. Journal of Management, 29, 511–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, N. G., & Worthington, E. L. Jr. (2005). In search of a common core: A content analysis of interventions to promote forgiveness. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42, 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthington, E. L. Jr. (1998). Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological perspectives. Randor, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Worthington, E. L. Jr. (2001). Unforgiveness, forgiveness, and reconciliation in society. In R. G. Helmick, & R. L. Petersen (Eds.), Forgiveness and reconciliation: Religion, public policy, and conflict transformation (pp. 161–182). Philadelphia, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Worthington, E. L., & Scherer, M. (2004). Forgiveness is an emotion-focused coping strategy that can reduce risks and promote health resilience: Theory, review and hypotheses. Psychology and Health, 19, 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthington, E. L. Jr., & Wade, N. G. (1999). The psychology of unforgiveness and forgiveness and implications for clinical practice. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 385–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26, 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamhure Thompson, L., & Shahen, P.E. (2003). Forgiveness in the workplace. In R. C. Giacalone, & C. L. Jurkiewicz (Eds.), Handbook of spirituality and organizational performance (pp. 405–420). New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar