Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T01:00:19.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship between workgroup identification and organizational identification: The moderating role of perceived similarities between targets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2014

Géraldine Marique ,
Florence Stinglhamber ,
Donatienne Desmette  and
Edwine Goldoni
Géraldine Marique*
Affiliation:
Université catholique de Louvain, Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Place Cardinal Mercier, 10, bte L3.05.01, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Florence Stinglhamber
Affiliation:
Université catholique de Louvain, Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Place Cardinal Mercier, 10, bte L3.05.01, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Donatienne Desmette
Affiliation:
Université catholique de Louvain, Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Place Cardinal Mercier, 10, bte L3.05.01, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Edwine Goldoni
Affiliation:
Université catholique de Louvain, Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Place Cardinal Mercier, 10, bte L3.05.01, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
*
Corresponding author: geraldine.marique@uclouvain.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present research aims to examine the role played by perceived similarities between the workgroup and the organization in the relationships between workgroup identification, organizational identification, and affective organizational commitment. Using two different samples, we found that when perceived similarities were high, workgroup identification was more strongly related to organizational identification and that this relationship carried over to affective organizational commitment. These results were obtained with both a global measure of perceived similarities (Study 1) and a more narrow measure operationalizing perceived similarities in terms of value congruence (Study 2), confirming the generalizability of our results.

Keywords

identificationaffective commitmentmultifociperceived similarities
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , July 2014 , pp. 485 - 507
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, L. S., West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., Johnson, S. A. (2001). Which hat to wear? The relative salience of multiple identities in organizational contexts. In M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Social identity processes in organizational contexts (pp. 31–48). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. The Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagozzi, R. P., Edwards, J. R. (1998). A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 45–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamber, E. M., Iyer, V. M. (2002). Big 5 auditors’ professional and organizational identification: Consistency or conflict? Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 21, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, J., Pruyn, A., De Jong, M., Joustra, I. (2007). Multiple organizational identification levels and the impact of perceived external prestige and communication climate. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baruch, Y., Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61, 1139–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 274–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M., Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergami, M., Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 555–577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (pp. 398–444). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Cable, D. M., DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 875–884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cable, D. M., Edwards, J. R. (2004). Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 822–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmeli, A., Gilat, G., Weisberg, J. (2006). Perceived external prestige, organizational identification and affective commitment: A stakeholder approach. Corporate Reputation Review, 9, 92–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., Mayer, D. M. (2010). Cooperating when “you” and “I” are treated fairly: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1121–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J. R., Cable, D. M. (2009). The value of value congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 654–677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberger, R., Karagonlar, G., Stinglhamber, F., Neves, P., Becker, T. E., Gonzalez-Morales, M. G., Steiger-Mueller, M. (2010). Leader-member exchange and affective organizational commitment: The contribution of supervisor's organizational embodiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1085–1103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 617–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautam, T., van Dick, R., Wagner, U. (2004). Organizational identification and organizational commitment: Distinct aspects of two related concepts. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, T., Paulsen, N., Jones, L. (2002). Multiple targets of organizational identification: The role of identification congruency. Journal for Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis, 1, 22–31.Google Scholar
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. The Academy of Management Review, 25, 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jetten, J., Summerville, N., Hornsey, M. J., Mewse, A. J. (2005). When differences matter: Intergroup distinctiveness and the evaluation of impostors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 609–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. D., Morgeson, F. P., Ilgen, D. R., Meyer, C. J., Lloyd, J. W. (2006). Multiple professional identities: Examining differences in identification across work-related targets. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 498–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jöreskog, K. G., Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
Klimoski, R. J., Jones, R. G. (1995). Staffing for effective group decision making: Key issues in matching people and teams? In R. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals'fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loi, R., Hang-yue, N., Foley, S. (2004). The effect of professional identification on job attitudes: A study of lawyers in Hong Kong. Organizational Analysis, 12, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mael, F., Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marique, G., Stinglhamber, F. (2011). Identification to proximal targets and affective organizational commitment: The mediating role of organizational identification. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 10, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z. L., Hau, K. T. (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods, 9, 275–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E., van Dick, R. (2006). Social identities and commitments at work: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 665–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. P., Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 299–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. -Y., Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reichers, A. E. (1986). Conflict and organizational commitments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 508–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 358–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riketta, M., Nienaber, S. (2007). Multiple identities and work motivation: The role of perceived compatibility between nested organizational units. British Journal of Management, 18, 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, T. C. (1998). Organizational and professional identification: A case of newspaper journalists. Management Communication Quarterly, 12, 72–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siemsen, E., Roth, A., Oliveira, P. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 456–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinglhamber, F., Bentein, K., Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Congruence de valeurs et engagement envers l'organisation et le groupe de travail. Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 10, 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the selfconcept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.),, Advances in group processes, vol. 2 (pp. 77–122). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
van Dick, R. (2001). Identification in organizational contexts: Linking theory and research from social and organizational psychology. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dick, R., Christ, O., Stellmacher, J., Wagner, U., Ahlswede, O., Grubba, C., Hauptmeier, M., Höhfeld, C., Moltzen, K., Tissington, P. A. (2004). Should I stay of should I go? Explaining turnover intentions with organizational identification and job satisfaction. British Journal of Management, 15, 351–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dick, R., Wagner, U. (2002). Social identification among school teachers: Dimensions, foci, and correlates. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Knippenberg, D., Sleebos, E. (2006). Organizational identification versus organizational commitment: Self-definition, social exchange, and job attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 571–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Knippenberg, D., van Schie, E. C. M. (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar