Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T12:05:20.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Congruence in positive implicit followership theories, relational identification, and job performance: The moderating role of uncertainty avoidance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2023

Jian Peng
Affiliation:
School of Management, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China
Qi Nie
Affiliation:
School of Business, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China
Xiao Chen*
Affiliation:
School of Business and Digital Leadership Research Center, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, China
Zhijie Zhang
Affiliation:
Human Resource Management Department, Jiangmen Dachangjiang Group Co., Ltd., Jiangmen, China
*
Corresponding author: Xiao Chen; Email: xiaochen_hrm@163.com

Abstract

While previous research has identified the performance implications of leaders’ positive implicit followership theories (IFTs, i.e., personal expectations regarding followers’ positive characteristics), this study focuses on the effect of leader–follower congruence in positive IFTs on followers’ job performance. To test our predictions, we conducted two complementary studies. The results of Study 1 (an experiment, N = 200) show that leader–follower congruence (versus incongruence) in positive IFTs is positively related to followers’ relational identification with the leader, which, in turn, is positively related to followers’ job performance. Moreover, followers’ uncertainty avoidance strengthens this relationship. These findings were replicated in Study 2 (a three-wave survey, N = 223) through polynomial regression and response surface analysis. This study improves our understanding of IFTs by showing that leader–follower congruence in this domain is related to followers’ outcomes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguinis, H., & Bradley, K. J. (2014). Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17 (4), 351371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almeida, T., Ramalho, N. C., & Esteves, F. (2021). Can you be a follower even when you do not follow the leader? Yes, you can. Leadership, 17(3), 336364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, H. J., Baur, J. E., Griffith, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (2017). What works for you may not work for (Gen) Me: Limitations of present leadership theories for the new generation. The Leadership Quarterly, 28 (1), 245260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (6), 15381567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernerth, J. B., & Aguinis, H. (2016). A critical review and best-practice recommendations for control variable usage. Personnel Psychology, 69 (1), 229283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Blodgett, J. G., Lu, L. C., Rose, G. M., & Vitell, S. J. (2001). Ethical sensitivity to stakeholder interests: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29 (2), 190202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, K., & Dutton, J. (Eds.). (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
Carmeli, A., Atwater, L., & Levi, A. (2011). How leadership enhances employees’ knowledge sharing: The intervening roles of relational and organizational identification. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36, 257274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsten, M. K., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2013). Ethical followership: An examination of followership beliefs and crimes of obedience. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(1), 4961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H. Y., & Kao, S. R. (2009). Chinese paternalistic leadership and non-Chinese subordinates’ psychological health. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20 (12), 25332546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyle, P. T., & Foti, R. (2015). If you’re not with me you’re..? Examining prototypes and cooperation in leader-follower Relationships. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(2), 161174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyle, P. T., & Foti, R. (2022a). How do leaders vs. followers construct followership? A field study of implicit followership theories and work-related affect using latent profile analysis. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 29(1), 115130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyle, P. T., & Foti, R. (2022b). Do leaders and followers see eye to eye? Exploring patterns of congruent expectations and self-views in leader-follower relationships. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43 (6), 874889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, H., Dietvorst, B. J., Tuckfield, B., Milkman, K. L., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2018). Quitting when the going gets tough: A downside of high performance expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 61 (5), 16671691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRue, D. S., & Ashford, S. J. (2010). Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35 (4), 627647.Google Scholar
DeRue, D. S., Ashford, S. J., & Cotton, N. C. (2009). Assuming the mantle: Unpacking the process by which individuals internalize a leader identity. In Roberts, L. M. and Dutton, J. E. (Eds.), Exploring positive identities and organizations: Building a theoretical and research foundation (pp. 217236). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Dorfman, P. W., & Howell, J. P. (1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited. Advances in International Comparative Management, 3, 127150.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12 (1), 122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36 (6), 15771613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epitropaki, O., Kark, R., Mainemelis, C., & Lord, R. G. (2017). Leadership and followership identity processes: A multilevel review. The Leadership Quarterly, 28 (1), 104129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epitropaki, O., Sy, T., Martin, R., Tram-Quon, S., & Topakas, A. (2013). Implicit leadership and followership theories “in the wild”: Taking stock of information–processing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings. The Leadership Quarterly, 24 (6), 858881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, A., Carsten, M., & Coyle, P. (2022). Antecedents and consequences of leaders’ implicit followership theories. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 95 (2), 495520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, A., Park, H. I., & Beehr, T. A. (2020). Does the congruence between leaders’ implicit followership theories and their perceptions of actual Followers matter? Journal of Business and Psychology, 35, 519538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graen, G. B., & Uhl–Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi–level multi–domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6 (2), 219247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London & Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Haslam, S. A., & Ellemers, N. (2005). Social identity in industrial and organizational psychology: Concepts, controversies and contributions. In Hodgkinson, G. P. and Ford, J. K. (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 39118). Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 223255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, M. A. (2007). Uncertainty-identity theory. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol 39, pp. 69126). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A., Van Knippenberg, D., & Rast, D. E. (2012). The social identity theory of leadership: Theoretical origins, research findings, and conceptual developments. European Review of Social Psychology, 23 (1), 258304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holley, E. C., Wu, K., & Avey, J. B. (2019). The impact of leader trustworthiness on employee voice and performance in China. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(2), 179189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, P. V., Kleinmann, M., König, C. J., & Melchers, K. G. (2015). Transparency of assessment centers: Lower criterion-related validity but greater opportunity to perform? Personnel Psychology, 69 (2), 467497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junker, N. M., Stegmann, S., Braun, S., & Van Dick, R. (2016). The ideal and the counter-ideal follower – Advancing implicit followership theories. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37 (8), 12051222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junker, N. M., & van Dick, R. (2014). Implicit theories in organizational settings: A systematic review and research agenda of implicit leadership and followership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 25 (6), 11541173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, R. (1992). The power of followership. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Knoll, M., Schyns, B., & Petersen, L. E. (2017). How the influence of unethical leaders on followers is affected by their implicit followership theories. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24 (4), 450465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ko, C., Ma, J., Kang, M., English, A. S., & Haney, M. H. (2017). How ethical leadership cultivates healthy guanxi to enhance OCB in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 55(4), 408429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P., Leung, K., Chen, C. C., & Luo, J. D. (2012). Indigenous research on Chinese management: What and how. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), 724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, R. G., Epitropaki, O., Foti, R. J., & Hansbrough, T. K. (2020). Implicit leadership theories, implicit followership theories, and dynamic processing of leadership information. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7, 4974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matta, F. K., Scott, B., Koopman, J., & Conlon, D. (2015). Does seeing ‘eye to eye’ affect work engagement and OCB? A role theory perspective on LMX agreement. Academy of Management Journal, 58 (6), 16861708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milesi, P. (2022). Identity leadership, procedural justice, and group identification in uncertain organizational contexts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 52(9), 886911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohammadzadeh, Z., Mortazavi, S., Lagzian, M., & Rahimnia, F. (2015). Toward an exploration of follower’s implicit followership theories of Mashhad’s large organizations using a qualitative approach. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 8 (3), 397419.Google Scholar
Mueller, J. S., Melwani, S., & Goncalo, J. A. (2012). The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23 (1), 1317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
Pelled, L. H., & Xin, K. R. (1997). Birds of a feather: Leader-member demographic similarity and organizational attachment in Mexico. The Leadership Quarterly, 8 (4), 433450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, J., Chen, X., Nie, Q., & Wang, Z. (2020). Proactive personality congruence and creativity: A leader identification perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 35 (7/8), 543558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, J., & Wang, X. (2016). I will perform effectively if you are with me: Leader-follower congruence in followership prototype, job engagement and job performance. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48 (9), 11511162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qu, R., Janssen, O., & Shi, K. (2015). Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The mediating role of follower relational identification and the moderating role of leader creativity expectations. The Leadership Quarterly, 26 (8), 286299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, S. A., & Hogg, M. A. (2005). Uncertainty reduction, self–enhancement, and ingroup identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31 (6), 804817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riggs, B. S., & Porter, C. O. (2017). Are there advantages to seeing leadership the same? A test of the mediating effects of LMX on the relationship between ILT congruence and employees’ development. The Leadership Quarterly, 28 (2), 285299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schyns, B., Kiefer, T., Kerschreiter, R., & Tymon, A. (2011). Teaching implicit leadership theories to develop leaders and leadership: How and why it can make a difference. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10 (3), 397408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 543554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32 (1), 932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluss, D. M., Ployhart, R. E., Cobb, G. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2012). Generalizing newcomers relational and organizational identifications: Processes and prototypicality. Academy of Management Journal, 55 (4), 949975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sy, T. (2010). What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113 (2), 7384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, C. Y., Dionne, S. D., Wang, A. C., Spain, S. M., Yammarino, F. J., & Cheng, B. S. (2017). Effects of relational schema congruence on leader-member exchange. The Leadership Quarterly, 28 (2), 268284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhl-Bien, M., Riggio, R. E., Lowe, K. B., & Carsten, M. K. (2014). Followership theory: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 83104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Quaquebeke, N., Graf, M. M., & Eckloff, T. (2014). What do leaders have to live up to? Contrasting the effects of central tendency- versus ideal-based leader prototypes in leader categorization processes. Leadership, 10 (2) , 190215.Google Scholar
van Vianen, A. E. M. (2018). Person-environment fit: A review of its basic tenets. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 75101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veestraeten, M., Johnson, S. K., Leroy, H., Sy, T., & Sels, L. (2021). Exploring the bounds of pygmalion effects: Congruence of implicit followership theories drives and binds leader performance expectations and follower work engagement. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 28 (2), 137153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, R., Rodell, J. B., & Lynch, J. (2016). Engaged and productive misfits: How job crafting and leisure activity mitigate the negative effects of value incongruence. Academy of Management Journal, 59 (5), 15611584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walumbwa, F. O., & Hartnell, C. A. (2011). Understanding transformational leadership–employee performance links: The role of identification with leader and self–efficacy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84 (1), 153172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzenbach, S. (2019). Hiding sensitive topics by design? An experiment on the reduction of social desirability bias in factorial surveys. Survey Research Methods 13(1), 103121.Google Scholar
Wang, A. C., Tsai, C. Y., Dionne, S. D., Yammarino, F. J., Spain, S. M., Ling, H. C., and Cheng, B. S. (2018). Benevolence-dominant, authoritarianism-dominant, and classical paternalistic leadership: Testing their relationships with subordinate performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 29 (6), 686697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, D. T., & Ordóñez, L. D. (2014). The dark side of consecutive high performance goals: Linking goal setting, depletion, and unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123 (2), 7989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, P., Sy, T., & Johnson, S. K. (2012). Leaders’ conceptions of followers: Implications for naturally occurring Pygmalion effects. The Leadership Quarterly, 23 (5), 822834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, D. T., Sendjaya, S., Hirst, G., & Cooper, B. (2014). Does servant leadership foster creativity and innovation? A multi-level mediation study of identification and prototypicality. Journal of Business Research, 67 (7), 13951404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L., Deng, Y., & Wang, Q. (2014). An exploratory study of Chinese motives for building supervisor–subordinate guanxi. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(4), 659675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z., Wang, M. O., & Shi, J. (2012). Leader-follower congruence in proactive personality and work outcomes: The mediating role of leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 55 (1), 111130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X., & Zhou, J. (2014). Empowering leadership, uncertainty avoidance, trust, and employee creativity: Interaction effects and a mediating mechanism. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 124 (2), 150164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, W., He, H., Trevino, L. K., Chao, M. M., & Wang, W. (2015). Ethical leadership and follower voice and performance: The role of follower identifications and entity morality beliefs. The Leadership Quarterly, 26 (5), 702718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar