Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:30:27.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Board leadership and governance for clear-sighted CEO succession at Air New Zealand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2018

Monique Cikaliuk ,
Ljiljana Eraković ,
Brad Jackson ,
Chris Noonan  and
Susan Watson
Monique Cikaliuk
Affiliation:
Department of Management and International Business, The University of Auckland Business School, Auckland, New Zealand
Ljiljana Eraković*
Affiliation:
Department of Management and International Business, The University of Auckland Business School, Auckland, New Zealand
Brad Jackson
Affiliation:
Department of International Business and Asian Studies, Griffith Business School, Brisbane, Australia
Chris Noonan
Affiliation:
The University of Auckland Law School, Auckland, New Zealand
Susan Watson
Affiliation:
The University of Auckland Law School, Auckland, New Zealand
*
Corresponding author: l.erakovic@auckland.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this case study we address the issue of CEO succession drawing directly on the experience of the board of directors of Air New Zealand. Despite extensive literature on CEO-board relations, there has been a scarce number of studies on managing the processes of CEO succession and appointment from the board perspective. Drawing on documentary sources as well as in-depth interviews with all board members and CEOs appointed in the period 2002–2013, we shed light on this important governance process primarily for teaching purposes. We emphasise the board’s role in the context of the transformation of the airline into an award-winning, financially performing company in a highly competitive and mature industry. The case study examines how the board developed, implemented, and managed a succession process for three CEOs that was sound in design and achieved its desired benefits. By focusing on board leadership and board processes our case study provides evidence that independent boards can shape a specific combination of governance practices which contribute to successful CEO transitions.

Keywords

CEO successionboard of directorsboard leadershipNew Zealandcase study
Type
Case Study
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 26 , Issue 5 , September 2020 , pp. 774 - 797
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This case was written with the cooperation of the Air New Zealand board solely for the purpose of stimulating class discussion. All data contained in the case are based on field research and public sources. The research underpinning this case study included in-depth interviews with all board members and CEOs appointed in the period 2002–2013. The case is not intended to be used as illustration of either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation.

References

References

Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, E. L. (2004). CEO succession planning: An emerging challenge for boards of directors. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 105–107.Google Scholar
Boeker, W., & Goldstein, J. (1993). Performance and successor choice: The moderating effects of governance and ownership. Academy of Management Journal, 36(1), 172–186.Google Scholar
Cannella, A. A., & Lubatkin, M. (1993). Succession as a sociopolitical process: Internal impediments to outsider selection. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 763–793.Google Scholar
Carroll, G. R. (1984). Dynamics of publisher succession in newspaper organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chait, R. P., Ryan, W. P., & Taylor, B. E. (2005). Governance as leadership: Reframing the work of nonprofit boards. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Clutterbuck, D. (1998). Handing over the reins: Should the CEO’s successor be an insider or an outsider? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 6(2), 78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, J. C. (2001). Good to great: Why some companies make the leap… and others don’t. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Dempsey, P. S. (2008). The financial performance of the airline industry post-deregulation. Houston Law Review, 45 (2), 421–485.Google Scholar
Erakovic, L., & Jackson, B. (2012). Promoting leadership in governance and governance in leadership: Towards a support research agenda. In A. Davila, M. Elvira, J. Ramirez, & L. Zapata-Cantu (Eds.), Understanding organizations in complex, emergent and uncertain environments (pp. 68–83). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. (2003). Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 101–113.Google Scholar
Flyvberg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, D., & Milliken, F. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forester, S., & McGraw, P. (2002). Air New Zealand: The recapitalization decision. Case study. Ref. no. 9B02N017. Richard Ivey School of Business, Canada.Google Scholar
Friedman, S. D., Saul, K. (1991). A leader’s wake: Organization member reactions to CEO succession. Journal of Management, 17(3), 619–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, B. R. (1992). The past is the past—or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 848–860.Google Scholar
Guerrero, S., Lapalme, M. È., & Séguin, M. (2014). Board chair authentic leadership and nonexecutives’ motivation and commitment. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(1), 88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huse, M. (1994). Board-management relations in small firms: The paradox of simultaneous independence and interdependence. Small Business Economics, 6(1), 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huse, M. (2005). Accountability and creating accountability: A framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of corporate governance. British Journal of Management, 16(Special Issue), S76–S79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huse, M. (2007). Boards, governance and value creation: The human side of corporate governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huse, M. (Ed.). (2008). The value creating board: Corporate governance and organizational behaviour. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, B., & Parry, K. (2018). A very short fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about studying leadership. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Khurana, R. (2001). Finding the right CEO: Why boards often make poor choices. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(1), 91–95.Google Scholar
Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leblanc, R., & Gillies, J. (2005). Inside the boardroom: How boards really work and the coming revolution in corporate governance. Mississauga, ONT: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Leblanc, R., & Schwartz, M. (2007). The black box of board process: Gaining access to a difficult subject. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5), 843–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. H., Phan, P. H., & Yoshikawa, T. (2008). The role of the board and its interaction with the successor’s human capital in the Asian family enterprise. Multinational Business Review, 16(2), 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockhart, J. C., & Taitoko, M. (2005). An examination of shareholder-stakeholder governance tension: A case study of the collapses of Ansett Holdings and Air New Zealand. In C. R. Lehman, T. Tinker, B. Merino & M. Neimark (Eds.), Corporate governance: Does any size fit? (Advances in Public Interest Accounting, Volume 11, pp. 223–246), Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Lorsch, J. W., & Khurana, R. (1999). Changing leaders. Harvard Business Review, 77(3), 96–105.Google Scholar
Machold, S., & Farquhar, S. (2013). Board task evolution: A longitudinal field study in the UK. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(2), 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMorland, J., & Eraković, L. (2013). Stepping through transitions: Management, leadership & governance in not-for-profit organisations. Auckland, New Zealand: CGO Transitions Ltd.Google Scholar
Minichilli, A., Zattoni, A., & Zona, F. (2009). Making boards effective: An empirical examination of board task performance. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nooteboom, B. (1996). Trust, opportunism, and governance: A process and control model. Organization Studies, 17(6), 985–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutionalized action and corporate governance: The reliance on rules of CEO succession. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 384–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pargendler, M. (2012). State ownership and corporate governance. Fordham Law Review, 80(6), 2917–2973.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, A. (1997). What is a processual analysis? Scandanavian Journal of Management, 13(4), 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, A. M. (2012). Context and action in the transformation of the firm: A reprise. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1304–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pugliese, A., Nicholson, G., & Bezemer, P. J. (2015). An observational analysis of the impact of board dynamics and directors’ participation on perceived board effectiveness. British Journal of Management, 26(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rejchrt, P., & Higgs, M. (2014). Who are our leaders? A study of CEO succession in the UK FTSE 350 companies. Journal of General Management, 39(3), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhim, J. C., Peluchette, J. V., & Song, I. (2006). Stock market reactions and firm performance surrounding CEO succession: Antecedents of succession and successor origin. American Journal of Business, 21(1), 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, W., & Cannella, A. A. (2002). Revisiting the performance consequences of CEO succession: The impacts of successor type, postsuccession senior executive turnover, and departing CEO tenure. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 717–733.Google Scholar
Stiles, P., & Taylor, B. (2001). Boards at work: How directors view their roles and responsibilities: How directors view their roles and responsibilities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. (2003). Air New Zealand. Case study. Ref. no. 303-120-1, Huddersfield University Business School.Google Scholar
Thomsen, S., & Pedersen, T. (2011). Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 689–705.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Useem, M. (2006). How well-run boards make decisions. Harvard Business Review, 8(11), 130.Google Scholar
Vandewaerde, M., Voordeckers, W., Lambrechts, F., & Bammens, Y. (2011). Board team leadership revisited: A conceptual model of shared leadership in the boardroom. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 403–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Ees, H., Gabrielsson, J., & Huse, M. (2009). Toward a behaviourial theory of boards and governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisbach, M. S. (1988). Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 431–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (2013). A behavioral theory of corporate governance: Explicating the mechanisms of socially situated and socially constituted agency. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 607–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yar Hamidi, D., & Gabrielsson, J. (2014). Developments and trends in research on board leadership: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 9(3), 243–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajac, E. J. (1990). CEO selection, succession, compensation and firm performance: A theoretical integration and empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3), 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajac, E. J., & Westphal, J. D. (1996). Who shall succeed? How CEO/board preferences and power affect the choice of new CEOs. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 64–90.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Rajagopalan, N. (2006). Grooming for the top post and ending the CEO succession crisis. Organizational Dynamics, 35(1), 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Rajagopalan, N. (2010). CEO succession planning: Finally at the center stage of the boardroom. Business Horizons, 53(5), 455–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Case Study Documentary Sources

Air New Zealand. (2007, November 7). Air New Zealand Scoops World Travel Award. Retrieved October 20, 2015, from https://www.infonews.co.nz/news.cfm?id=8886.Google Scholar
Air New Zealand. (2016). Corporate Profile. Retrieved June 19, 2016, from https://www.airnewzealand.co.nz/corporate-profile.Google Scholar
Bisignani, G. (2011). Foreword. Vision 2050 Report. International Air Transport Association. Retrieved October 21, 2015, from http://www.iata.org/pressroom/facts_figures/Documents/vision-2050.pdf.Google Scholar
CAPA. (2012, August 31). Rob Fyfe bows out of Air New Zealand with projection for profits to double in 2013. Retrieved September 11, 2015, from http://centreforaviation.com/analysis/rob-fyfe-bows-out-of-air-new-zealand-with-projection-for-profits-to-double-in-2013-81549.Google Scholar
CAPA. (2013). New Zealand. World Aviation Yearbook: South Pacific. Retrieved September 11, 2015, from http://centreforaviation.com/about-capa/updates/capa-world-aviation-yearbook-2013-country-airline-data-in-a-comprehensive-1000-page-report-109509.Google Scholar
CAPA. (2013, February 28). Air New Zealand reports NZD136 million 1HFY2013 profit, up 300%: A generally favourable outlook. Retrieved September 11, 2015, from http://centreforaviation.com/analysis/air-new-zealand-reports-nzd136-million-1hfy2013-profit-up-300-a-generally-favourable-outlook-99427.Google Scholar
CAPA. (2013, June 16). Air New Zealand, the little airline that can, triples its FY2012 profit and 10 year average earnings. Retrieved September 11, 2015, from http://centreforaviation.com/analysis/air-new-zealand-the-little-airline-that-can-triples-its-fy2012-profit-and-10-year-average-earnings-114193.Google Scholar
IATA. (2010, February). Airline Profitability Size and Business Model Economic Briefing, Retrieved September 23, 2015, from http://www.iata.org/whatwedo/Documents/economics/Airline_2008_Profits_Feb2010.pdf.Google Scholar
Knibb, D. (2004, May). Ralph Norris: Down to business. Airline Business, 20(5): 34.Google Scholar
Le Pla, R. (2006, September). Rob Fyfe: Blue sky thinking behind the clouds. New Zealand Management Magazine, 53(8): 48–51.Google Scholar
Oxford Economics. (2011). Economic benefits from air transport in New Zealand. Retrieved October 5, 2015, from http://www.benefitsofaviation.aero/Documents/Benefits-of-Aviation-New-Zealand-2011.pdf.Google Scholar
Parliament of Australia. (2001, December 20). Key Australian Aviation Policy Developments: The Ansett Airlines Context 1937–2001 Chronology. Retrieved September 15, 2015, from http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/Publications_Archive/online/ansettchronPartA.Google Scholar
Pearce, B., & Doernhoefer, G. (2011). The economic benefits generated by Alliances and Joint Ventures. International Air Transport Association. Retrieved October 5, 2015, from http://www.iata.org/whatwedo/Documents/economics/Economics%20of%20JVs_Jan2012L.pdf.Google Scholar
Perry, N. (2012, June 19). Air NZ’s new CEO Christopher Luxon sees growth opportunities in Asia, US. Retrieved September 20, 2015, from http://globalnews.ca/news/257764/ap-interview-air-nzs-new-ceo-christopher-luxon-sees-growth-opportunities-in-asia-us/.Google Scholar
Porter, M., & Pearce, B. (2011). Structuring for profitability. Vision 2050 Report. International Air Transport Association. Retrieved October 21, 2015, from http://www.iata.org/pressroom/facts_figures/Documents/vision-2050.pdf.Google Scholar