Goffman, E., Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity (New York: Prentice Hall 1963): at 3.Google Scholar

Goffman, , supra note 1: at 13.Google Scholar

Goffman, , supra note 1: at 12.Google Scholar

Link, B. G. and Phelan, J. C., “Conceptualizing Stigma,” Annual Review of Sociology 27 (2001) 363-385.Google Scholar

Room, R., “Stigma, Social Inequality and Alcohol and Drug Use,” Drug and Alcohol Review 24, no. 2 (2005): 143-155.Google Scholar

AIVL, Why Wouldn’t I Discriminate Against All of Them?” A Report on Stigma and Discrimination Towards the Injecting Drug User Community (Canberra: Australian Injecting and Illicit Drug Users League, 2011); Corrigan, P. W., Kuwabara, S. A. and O’Shaughnessy, J., “The Public Stigma of Mental Illness and Drug Addiction: Findings from a Stratified Random Sample,” Journal of Social Work 9, no. 2, (2009): 139-147; Lloyd, C., Sinning and Sinned Against: The Stigma-tisation of Problem Drug Users (London: UK Drug Policy Commission (UKDPC), 2010); Lloyd, C., “The Stigmatization of Problem Drug Users: A Narrative Literature review,” Drugs: Education, Prevention, and Policy 20, no. 2 (2013): 85–95; Radcliffe, P. and Stevens, A., “Are Drug Treatment Services Only for ‘Thieving Junkie Scumbags?’ Drug Users and the Management of Stigmatised Identities,” Social Science & Medicine 67, no. 7 (2008): 1065–1073; Simmonds, L. and Coomber, R., “Injecting Drug Users: A Stigmatised and Stigmatising Population,” International Journal of Drug Policy 20, no. 2 (2009): 121–130; UKDPC, Getting Serious About Stigma: The Problem with Stigmatising Drug Users (London: UK Drug Policy Commission (UKDPC), 2010).Google Scholar

Lloyd, supra note 6.Google Scholar

UKDPC, supra note 6.Google Scholar

Lloyd, supra note 6 (2013).Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, J. L., McDonald, K. and Klugman, M., Unspoken but Everpresent: Hepatitis C in a Regional Setting (Melbourne: University of Melbourne, 2004).Google Scholar

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2008, available at <https://www.unodc.org/documents/wdr/WDR_2008/WDR_2008_eng_web.pdf>, at 216 (last visited November 13, 2017).,+at+216+(last+visited+November+13,+2017).>Google Scholar

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2016 (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.16. XI.7), available at <https://www.unodc.org/doc/wdr2016/WORLD_DRUG_REPORT_2016_web.pdf> (last visited November 13, 2017); see also UNAIDS, Do No Harm: Health, Human Rights, and People Who Use Drugs (New York, UNAIDS, 2016).+(last+visited+November+13,+2017);+see+also+UNAIDS,+Do+No+Harm:+Health,+Human+Rights,+and+People+Who+Use+Drugs+(New+York,+UNAIDS,+2016).>Google Scholar

World Health Assembly, Resolution on Viral Hepatitis 2010, WHA 67.6.Google Scholar

World Health Organization, Global Health Sector Strategy on Viral Hepatitis 2016-2021: Towards Ending Viral Hepatitis (Geneva: World Health Organization, 2016): at 42.Google Scholar

World Health Organisation, supra note 14, at 42.Google Scholar

Ministerial Council on Drug Strategy, National Drug Strategy 2010-2015: A Framework for Action on Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drugs, 2011 (Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2011).Google Scholar

At the time of writing, Australia’s next National Drug Strategy was still under development.Google Scholar

Commonwealth of Australia, Fourth National Hepatitis C Strategy, 2014-2017 (Canberra, Australia, 2014): at 6.Google Scholar

Goffman, , supra note 1, at 3.Google Scholar

Goffman, , supra note 1, at 3-4.Google Scholar

Goffman, , supra note 1, at 4.Google Scholar

Fraser, S. and Valentine, K., Substance and Substitution: Methadone Subjects in Liberal Societies (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008); Fraser, S. and Seear, K., Making Disease, Making Citizens: The Politics of Hepatitis C (Aldershot: Ash-gate, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nussbaum, M., Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame and the Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Burris, S., “Stigma and the Law,” The Lancet 367, no. 9509 (2006): 529-531.Google Scholar

Room, supra note 5, at 147-148. See also, Buchanan, J., “Tackling Problem Drug Use: A New Conceptual Framework,” Social Work in Mental Health 2, no. 2–3 (2004) 117–138; Buchanan, J. and Young, L., “The War on Drugs — A War on Drug Users?” Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 7, no. 4 (2000) 409–422.Google Scholar

See, for example <http://www.countthecosts.org/sites/default/files/Stigma-briefing.pdf> (last visited November 13, 2017).+(last+visited+November+13,+2017).>Google Scholar

UNODC, supra note 12, at 99-100.Google Scholar

See, for example, Ahmed, S., The Cultural Politics of Emotion, 2nd ed. (New York: Routledge 2015); Butler, J., Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative (New York: Routledge 1997).Google Scholar

<https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/images/Memo%20-%20Changing%20Federal%20Terminology%20Regrading%20Substance%20Use%20and%20Substance%20Use%20Disorders.pdf> (last visited November 13, 2017).+(last+visited+November+13,+2017).>Google Scholar

Problematic terminology remains in use in drug law and drug policy, however, and at times is used by lawyers, sitting magistrates and judges. See, Seear, K. and Fraser, S., “Addiction Veri-diction: Gendering Agency in Legal Mobilisations of Addiction Discourse,” Griffith Law Review 25, no. 1 (2016): 13-29; Seear, K. and Fraser, S., “Beyond Criminal Law: The Multiple Constitution of Addiction in Australian Legislation,” Addiction Research & Theory 22, no. 5 (2014a): 438-450; Seear, K. and Fraser, S., “The Addict as Victim: Producing the ‘Problem’ of Addiction in Australian Victims of Crime Compensation.” International Journal of Drug Policy 25, no. 5 (2014b): 826–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seear, and Fraser, , supra note 30 (2014a).Google Scholar

Seear, and Fraser, , supra note 30 (2014a).Google Scholar

Mol, A., The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice (Durham: Duke University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Room, supra note 5, at 150.Google Scholar

Room, supra note 5, at 150.Google Scholar

Room, supra note 5, at 150.Google Scholar

Room, supra note 5, at 150.Google Scholar

Burris, supra note 24, at 530.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C., “On the Expressive Function of Law,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144 (1996): 2021-2024, at 2025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacchi, C., Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to Be? (Sydney: Pearson Education, 2009).Google Scholar

Seear, and Fraser, , supra note 30 (2014a).Google Scholar

Fraser, S., Pienaar, K., Dilkes-Frayne, E., Moore, D., Kokanovic, R., Treloar, C., and Dunlop, A., “Addiction Stigma and the Biopolitics of Liberal Modernity: A Qualitative Analysis,” International Journal of Drug Policy 44 (2017): 192-201.Google Scholar

Link and Phelan, supra note 4, at 366.Google Scholar

Link and Phelan, supra note 4.Google Scholar

Simmonds and Coomber, supra note 6.Google Scholar

Fraser, et al., supra note 43.Google Scholar

Kleinman, A. and Hall-Clifford, R., “Stigma: A Social, Cultural and Moral Process,” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 63, no. 6 (2009): 418-419; Link and Phelan, supra note 4.Google Scholar

Butler, J., “Performative Agency,” Journal of Cultural Economy 3, no. 2 (2010): 147; Butler, J., Bodies that Matter: On the Dis-cursive Limits of “Sex” (New York: Routledge, 1993); Butler, J., Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar

Race, K., “Framing Responsibility: HIV, Biomedical Prevention, and the Performativity of the Law,” Bioethical Inquiry 9, no. 3 (2012): 327-338 at 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Law, J., “Collateral Realities,” The Politics of Knowledge (London: Routledge, 2011) at 156.Google Scholar

Peters, J. Stone, “Legal Performance Good and Bad,” Law, Culture and the Humanities 4, no. 2 (2008): 179-200.Google Scholar

Butler, , supra note 48 (1990).Google Scholar

Race, , supra note 49.Google Scholar

Fraser, S. and Moore, D., (eds) The Drug Effect: Health, Crime and Society (Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Fraser, et al., supra note 42.Google Scholar

Butler, , supra note 48 (1993): at 3.Google Scholar

Goffman, , supra note 1, at 155.Google Scholar

Fraser, et al., supra note 42, at 195.Google Scholar

Fraser, et al., supra note 42, at 199.Google Scholar

The authors also recognize the possibility for stigma to be associated with what they call “specific enactments of intoxication.”Google Scholar

Race, , supra note 49, at 328.Google Scholar

Race, , supra note 49, at 328.Google Scholar

Race, K., “Drug Effects, Performativity and the Law,” International Journal of Drug Policy 22, no. 6 (2011): 410-412, at 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corrigan, P. W., Watson, A. C., Heyrman, A. C., Warpinski, A., Gracia, G., Slopen, N., et al. “Structural Stigma in State Legislation,” Psychiatric Services 56, no. 5 (2005): 557-563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corrigan, et al., supra note 64, at 557.Google Scholar

Corrigan, et al., supra note 64, at 558.Google Scholar

Corrigan, et al., supra note 64, at 558.Google Scholar

Quilter, J., McNamara, L., Seear, K., and Room, R., “Alcohol and Drug Use and Criminal Law: A National Study of the Significance of “Intoxication” Under Australian legislation,” UNSW Law Journal 39, no. 3 (2016a): 913-949; Quilter, J., McNamara, L., Seear, K., and Room, R., “The Definition and Significance of ‘Intoxication in Australian Criminal Law: A Case Study of Queensland’s ‘Safe night out’ legislation,” QUT Law Review 16, no. 2 (2016b): 42-58.Google Scholar

Fraser, et al., supra note 42.Google Scholar