Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
DeRenzo, Evan G.
1997.
Decisionally Impaired Persons in Research: Refining the Proposed Refinements.
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 2-3,
p.
139.
Santosuosso, A.
1997.
Informed consent to clinical research.
The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences,
Vol. 18,
Issue. S5,
p.
15.
Kapp, Marshall B.
1998.
Persons With Dementia as “Liability Magnets”: Ethical Implications.
The Journal of Clinical Ethics,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 1,
p.
66.
Phipps, Etienne
Fleetwood, Janet
and
Piraino, Anthony
1999.
Research ethics and clinical trials: Fostering collaboration with research participants.
Accountability in Research,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 3,
p.
215.
Backlar, Patricia
1999.
A choice of one's ownresearch advance directives: Anticipatory planning for research subjects with fluctuating or prospective decisionmaking impairments.
Accountability in Research,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 2-4,
p.
117.
Cahill, Maura
and
Wichman, Alison
2000.
Research Involving Persons with Cognitive Impairments: Results of a Survey of Alzheimer Disease Research Centers in the United States.
Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
20.
Issa, Amalia M.
and
Keyserlingk, Edward W.
2000.
Current and future clinical trials for alzheimer s disease: Evolving ethical concerns.
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 8,
p.
1229.
Backlar, Patricia
2000.
Encyclopedia of Ethical, Legal and Policy Issues in Biotechnology.
Freedman, Ruth I.
2001.
Ethical Challenges in the Conduct of Research Involving Persons With Mental Retardation.
Mental Retardation,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 2,
p.
130.
Candilis, Philip J
2001.
Advancing the Ethics of Research.
Psychiatric Annals,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 2,
p.
119.
Appelbaum, Paul S.
2002.
Involving Decisionally Impaired Subjects in Research: The Need for Legislation.
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 2,
p.
120.
Beck, Cornelia
and
Shue, Valorie
2003.
Surrogate Decision-Making and Related Issues.
Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders,
Vol. 17,
Issue. ,
p.
S12.
Maschke, Karen J.
2003.
Proxy Research Consent and the Decisionally Impaired.
Journal of Disability Policy Studies,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 4,
p.
254.
Dye, Linda
Hendy, Steve
Hare, Dougal Julian
and
Burton, Mark
2004.
Capacity to consent to participate in research – a recontextualization.
British Journal of Learning Disabilities,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 3,
p.
144.
Dalton, Arthur J.
and
McVilly, Keith R.
2004.
Ethics Guidelines for International, Multicenter Research Involving People with Intellectual Disabilities1,2,3,4.
Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 2,
p.
57.
2005.
FDA Administrative Enforcement Manual.
p.
41.
Mcvilly, Keith R.
Stancliffe, Roger J.
Parmenter, Trevor R.
and
Burton‐Smith, Rosanne M.
2008.
Vol. 35,
Issue. ,
p.
151.
McDonald, Katherine E.
and
Keys, Christopher B.
2008.
How the Powerful Decide: Access to Research Participation by those at the Margins.
American Journal of Community Psychology,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
79.
McDonald, Katherine E.
Keys, Christopher B.
Henry, David B.
and
MacLean, Jr., William E.
2008.
Gatekeepers of Science: Attitudes Toward the Research Participation of Adults With Intellectual Disability.
American Journal on Mental Retardation,
Vol. 113,
Issue. 6,
p.
466.
Dunn, Laura B.
and
Misra, Sahana
2009.
Research Ethics Issues in Geriatric Psychiatry.
Psychiatric Clinics of North America,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 2,
p.
395.