Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T15:51:21.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Trade, Law, and Public Health Advocacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Jason W. Sapsin ,
Theresa M. Thompson ,
Lesley Stone  and
Katherine E. DeLand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Public Health Science and practice expanded during the course of the 20th century. Initially focused on controlling infectious disease through basic public health programs regulating water, sanitation and food, by 1988 the Institute of Medicine broadly declared that “public health is what we, as a society, do collectively to. assure the conditions for people to be healthy.” Commensurate with this definition, public health practitioners and policymakers today work on ;in enormous range of issues. The 2002 policy agenda of the American Public Health Association reflects positions on genomics’ role in public health; national health and safety standards for child care programs; sodium in Americans’ diets; the health and safety of emergency rescue workers; and war in Central Asia and the Persian Gulf.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , Winter 2003 , pp. 546 - 556
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Institute of Medicine, The Future of Public Health (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1988): At 19.Google Scholar
American Public Health Association, Association News, “Policy Statements Adopted by the Governing Council of the American Public Health Association,” American Journal of Public Health, 93, no. 3 (2003): At 493.Google Scholar
Beaglehole, R., “Protecting Health in a Globalizing World,” Update 66 on Trade, European Public Health Alliance at <http://www.epha.org/a/336> (last visited November 17, 2003).+(last+visited+November+17,+2003).>Google Scholar
Alleyne, G., “Diplomacy and Public Health,” speaking at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, April 23, 2003.Google Scholar
See e.g., Jackson, J.H. Davey, W.J., International Economic Relations (St. Paul: West Publishing Co., 1986): At 8–10.Google Scholar
Sands, P. Klein, P., Bowett’s Law of International Institutions (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2001): At 2.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization, Legal Texts: The WTO Agreements, available at <http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/ursum_e.htm#Agreement> (last visited November 17, 2003).+(last+visited+November+17,+2003).>Google Scholar
The World Trade Organization. The World Trade Organization … in brief (Geneva: The World Trade Organization, 2003): At 4, available at <http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/doload_e/inbr_e.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Stein, E., “International Integration and Democracy: No Love at First Sight”, American Journal of International Law, 95 (2001): 489–534, at 490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Trade Organization. 10 Common Misunderstandings about the WTO (Geneva: The World Trade Organization, 2003): At 3, 11, available at <http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/doload_e/10mis_e.pdf>..>Google Scholar
See Jackson, Davey, , supra note 5, at 367–369.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization, supra note 10, at 7.Google Scholar
Grynberg, R. Joy, R.M., “The Accession of Vanuatu to the WTO – Lessons for the Multilateral Trading System,” Journal of World Trade, 34, no. 6 (2000): 159–173, at 171.Google Scholar
Bush, G.W., “Remarks at the International Conference on Financing for Development”, Monterrey, Mexico, March 22, 2002.Google Scholar
WTO Agreements & Public Health, “A Joint Study by the WHO and WTO Secretariat,” WTO Secretariat, VII-2002-6,000 (2002): At 23, available at <http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/who_wto_e.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Prasad, E. Rogoff, K. Wei, Shang-Jin Kose, M., Effects of Financial Globalization on Developing Countries: Some Empirical Evidence, International Monetary Fund, March 17, 2003; Milanovic, B., Can We Discern the Effect of Globalization on Income Distribution?, WORLD BANK POLICY RESEARCH WORKING PAP 1876, April 2002; Buss, P., “Globalization and Disease: Unequal World, Unequal Health!”, Cad. Saude Pub, 18, no. 6 (2002): 1783–1788; Weisbrot, M. Baker, D. Kraev, E. Chen, J., “The Scorecard on Globalization 1980–2000: Its Consequences for Economic and Social Well-Being,” International Journal of Health Services, 32, no. 2 (2002): 229–253; Rigged Rules and Double Standards: Trade, Globalization, and the Fight against Poverty, OXFAM (2002), available at <http://www.maketradefair.com/assets/english/Report_English.pdf>.Google Scholar
Blustein, P., “New Faith in Free Trade; In Break with Allies, Oxfam Backs Globalization,” The Washington Post, April 11, 2002 at E01.Google Scholar
Price, D. Pollack, A.M. Shaoul, J., “How the World Trade Organization is Shaping Domestic Policies in Health Care,” Lancet, 354 (1999): 1889–1892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloche, M.G., “WTO Deference to National Health Policy: Toward an Interpretive Principle,” Journal of International Economic Law (2002): 825–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aginam, O., “International Law and Communicable Diseases,” Bulletin of the WHO, 80(12) (2002): 946–951.Google Scholar
Room, R. West, P., “Alcohol and the U.S.-Canada Border: Trade Disputes and Border Traffic Problems,” Journal of Public Health Policy, 19, no. 1 (1998): 68–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabowski, H., “Patents, Innovation and Access to New Pharmaceuticals,” Journal of International Economic Law (2002): 849–860; Scherer, F.M. Watal, J., “Post-TRIPS Options for Access to Patented Medicines in Developing Nations,” Journal of International Economic Law (2002): 913–939.Google Scholar
McLoughlin, E. Fairweather, A., “Influence of Free Trade on the Politics of Safety,” [guest editorial] Injury Prevention, 8 (2002): 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettcher, D.W. Yach, D. Guindon, G.E., “Global Trade and Health: Key Linkages and Future Challenges,” Bulletin of the WHO, 78, no. 4 (2000): 521–534.Google Scholar
E.g., Greider, W., “The Right and US Trade Law: Invalidating the 20th Century,” The Nation, October 15, 2001, 21–29, available at <http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20011015&c=6&s=greider>..>Google Scholar
World Trade Organization, World Trade in 2001(Geneva: The World Trade Organization, 2002): At 25 (Table 1.5).Google Scholar
Id. at 24 (Table 1.3).Google Scholar
World Trade Organization, General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (Geneva: World Trade Organization) at Art. XX, XX(b) available at <http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/06-gatt.pdf>..>Google Scholar
See WTO Agreements and Public Health supra, note 15 at 36.Google Scholar
French Civil Code, Decree No. 96–1133 (décret no. 96–1133 relatif à l’interdiction de l’amiante, pris en application du code de travail et du code de la consommation) passed: 24 December 1996; entry into force: 1 January 1997.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization “European Communities — Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products: Report of the Panel” (hereinafter “Asbestos Panel Report”) Doc. No. WT/DS135/R (18 September 2000), at 6, para 3.8.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Castleman, B.L., “WTO Confidential: The Case of Asbestos,” International Journal of Health Services 32, no. 3 (2002): 489–501, at 489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asbestos Panel Report, supra note 31, at 6, para 38.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization “European Communities - Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products: Report of the Appellate Body” (hereinafter “Asbestos Appellate Report”) Doc. No. WT/DS135/AB/R (12 March 2001), at 47, para 122.Google Scholar
Id. at 50, para 132.Google Scholar
Asbestos Panel Report, supra note 31, at 436–446. The Panel was unwilling to wait “until scientific certainty, which is often difficult to achieve, had been established over the whole of a particular field before public health measures could be implemented.” Asbestos Panel Report, at 446, para 8.221.Google Scholar
Asbestos Appellate Report, supra note 35, at 61–63.Google Scholar
Id. at 64, para 178.Google Scholar
Id. at 69–70, para 190.Google Scholar
Victor, D.G., “The Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement of the World Trade Organization: An Assessment after Five Years,” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 32 (2000): 865–937.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization, Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, LT/UR/A-1A/12 (adopted January 1, 1995): Article 2.1, available at <http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/15-sps.pdf> [hereinafter SPS Agreement].+[hereinafter+SPS+Agreement].>Google Scholar
WTO Appellate Body Report on Australia – Measures Affecting Importation of Salmon, WT/DS18/AB/R (October 20, 1998): At 199 [hereinafter Australian Salmon Report]; WTO Appellate Body Report on Japan – Measures Affecting Agricultural Products, WT/DS76/AB/R (February 22, 1999): At 79 [hereinafter Japanese Agricultural Products Report].Google Scholar
Japanese Agricultural Products Report, Id. at 84.Google Scholar
SPS Agreement, supra note 42, at Articles 2.2, 2.3.Google Scholar
Id. at Article 5.7.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Committee on Risk Assessment of Hazardous Air Pollutants, Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1994); compare Walker, V.R., “The Myth of Science as” a ‘Neutral Arbiter’ for Triggering Precautions,” Boston College International & Comparative Law Review 26 (2003): 197–212.Google Scholar
SPS Agreement, supra note 42, at Article 3.2.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization, Codex Alimentarius, at <http://www.codexalimentarius.net> (last visited November 17, 2003).+(last+visited+November+17,+2003).>Google Scholar
Victor, supra note 41, at 885.Google Scholar
Codex Alimentarius Commission, Twenty-fifth (Extraordinary) Session Report, ALINORM 03/25/5 (February 13, 2003): At Appendix 1, available at <ftp://ftp.fao.org/codex/alinorm03/alx3_05e.pdf>..>Google Scholar
SPS Agreement, supra note 42, at Article 5.1.Google Scholar
Id. at Article 5.2.Google Scholar
Id. at Article 5.5.Google Scholar
Id. at Article 5.6.Google Scholar
WTO Appellate Body Report on European Communities – Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones), WT/DS26/AB/R, WT/DS48/AB/R (February 13, 1998) [hereinafter Beef Hormones Report].Google Scholar
Kuik, K., “Recent Developments in EU/US Trade Relations,” University of Detroit Mercy Law Review, 79 (2002): 433–448.Google Scholar
Victor, supra note 41, at 899.Google Scholar
Victor, supra note 41, at 901–902.Google Scholar
Australian Salmon Report, supra note 43; Japanese Agricultural Products Report, supra note 43.Google Scholar
Silverglade, B.A., “The Impact of International Trade Agreements on U.S. Food Safety and Labeling Standards,” Food and Drug Law Journal, 53 (1998): 537–541, at 538; Victor, , supra note 7, at 879.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S.A., “International Agreements, Regulatory Protection, and Public Accountability,” Administrative Law Review, 54 (2002): 435–458.Google Scholar
Victor, , supra note 41, at 884.Google Scholar
Methanex Corp. v. United States (NAFTA Ch. 11 Arb. Trib.) available at <http://www.naftaclaims.com>..>Google Scholar
Id. (notice of intent) at 4.Google Scholar
International Institute for Sustainable Development and World Wildlife Fund, Private Rights, Public Problems, (Winnipeg, Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2001): At 96.Google Scholar
In the Matter of a Claim under Chapter 11, Section A, of the North American Free Trade Agreement and in the Matter of an Arbitration under UNCITRAL Arbitrtation Rules, STATEMENT OF CLAIM (Methanex), December 3, 1999, para. 36, available at <http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/8772.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Methanex, supra, note 64. In August, 2002, the Arbitral Tribunal ruled that there was not a legally sufficient connection between California’s action and Methanex. However, the tribunal allowed Methanex to proceed on the basis of its claim that the Governor of California specifically intended to harm Methanex’s business interests. Murphy, S. D., “Measures ‘Relating to’ Foreign Investors Under NAFTA Dispute Resolution,” American Journal of International Law, 97 (2003): 440.Google Scholar
Greider, , supra note 25, at 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See, e.g., Free Trade Area of the Americas FTAA – Negotiating Group on Investment, REPORT OF THE NEGOTIATING GROUP ON INVESTMENT (NGIN) TO THE TRADE NEGOTIATIONS COMMITTEE (TNC), at <http://www.wtowatch.org/library/admin/uploadedfiles/FTAA__02_Report_on_Investment_Draft_Investment.htm> (last accessed November 17, 2003).+(last+accessed+November+17,+2003).>Google Scholar
World Trade Organization, Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, LT/UR/A-1A/10 (adopted January 1, 1995): At Annex 1, para. 1, 2, available at <http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/17-tbt.pdf> [hereinafter TBT agreement].+[hereinafter+TBT+agreement].>Google Scholar
Id. at Article 2.9.Google Scholar
The Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal, UN Doc. EP/IG.80/3 (adopted March 22, 1989); Choksi, S., “The Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal: 1999 Protocol on Liability and Compensation,” Ecology Law Quarterly, 28 (2001): 509–539.Google Scholar
Mintz, J.A., “Two Cheers for Global POPs: A Summary and Assessment of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants,” Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 14 (2001): 319–332; Lallas, P.L., “The Role of Process and Participation in the Development of Effective International Environmental Agreements: A Study of the Global Treaty on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs),” UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 19 (2000–2001): 83–152.Google Scholar
WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, at Article G(1)(b), available at <http://tobacco.who.int/page.cfm?pid=40>..>Google Scholar
Id. at Article G1(d).Google Scholar
Id. at Article G(2).Google Scholar
Adlung, R. Carzaniga, A., Health services under the General Agreement on Trade in Services, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 79, no. 4 (2001): 352–364, at 352 available at <http://www.who.int/docstore/bulletin/tableofcontents/2001/vol.79no.4.html>.Google ScholarPubMed
World Trade Organization, Trade Statistics: Commercial Services Trade By Region and Selected Economies, 1980–2002 (Geneva: World Trade Organization, 2003) available at <http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/service_e.xls>..>Google Scholar
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), available at <http://www.nafta-sec-alena.org/english/nafta/nafta.htm> (last visited December 1, 2003).+(last+visited+December+1,+2003).>Google Scholar
World Trade Organization, Trading into the Future: Introduction to the WTO (Geneva: World Trade Organization, 2002): At 43 available at <http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/doload_e/tif.pdf>..>Google Scholar
World Trade Organization, Services Sectoral Classification List, available at <http://tsdb.wto.org/wto/MTN_GNSW120.html> (last visited December 1, 2003).+(last+visited+December+1,+2003).>Google Scholar
See, e.g., Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA), Provisions on Trade in Services in Trade and Integration Agreements in the Western Hemisphere, available at <http://www.ftaa-alca.oas.org/cp_serv/english/srv_toc.asp> (last visited December 1, 2003).+(last+visited+December+1,+2003).>Google Scholar
Findlay, C. Warren, T., Implications of General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) for Asia-Pacific Economies, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), ST/ESCAP/1926, No.27 (2000), available at <http://www.unescap.org/itid/publication/chap2_1926.pdf>.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Development and Cooperation, OECD Report on Regulatory Reform: Synthesis (1997): 5–10, available at <http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/17/25/2391768.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Pollock, A.M. Price, D., “Rewriting the Regulations: How the World Trade Organization Could Accelerate Privatization in Health-Care Systems,” Lancet, 356(9246) (2000): 1995–2000, at 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Trade Organization, Assessment of Trade in Services (Geneva: World Trade Organization, 2001): At 1, available at <http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/chap4_e.pdf>..>Google Scholar
World Trade Organization, Health and Social Services: Background Note by the Secretariat, 98–3558 S/C/W/50 (September 18, 1998): At 3, available at <http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/serv_e/w50.doc>..>Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Chandra, R., “Trade in Health Services,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 80, no. 2 (2002): 158–163, at 158 available at <http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/en/>.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization, General Agreement on Trade in Services, at 302, available at <http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/26-gats.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id. As outlined in Article I of GATS, the Most-Favored Nation clause states that no less-favorable conditions of competition will be accorded to the service suppliers of any one Member country, than are accorded to the service suppliers of any other Member country. Members may list exceptions to this obligation to honor prior previously negotiated bilateral or multilateral trade agreements.Google Scholar
See Adlung, R. Carzaniga, A., supra, note 78.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Bettcher, D. W. Yach, D. Guindon, G. E., “Global Trade and Health: Key Linkages and Future Challenges,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78, no. 4 (2000): 521–534, at 530 available at <http://www.who.int/docstore/bulletin/pdf/2000/issue4/bu0215.pdf>.Google Scholar
See Chandra, , supra, note 92.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Janjaroen, W.S. Supakankunti, S., “International Trade in Health Services in the—Millennium: The Case of Thailand,” Trade in Health Services (Geneva: The World Health Organization, 2000): 87–106 at 94–95,101.Google Scholar
See Chandra, , supra, note 92.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Zarrilli, S., “The Case of Brazil,” Trade in Health Services (Geneva: The World Health Organization, 2000): 143–153.Google Scholar
Widiatmoko, D. Gani, A., “International Relations within Indonesia’s Hospital Sector,” Trade in Health Services (Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000): 107–117.Google Scholar
Vellinga, J., “An Approach to Trade and Health at Health Canada,” Trade in Health Services (Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000): 193–196.Google Scholar
Price, Pollock, Shaoul, , supra, note 18 at 1.Google Scholar