Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T11:30:01.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crowd-Out and the Politics of Health Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Judith Feder
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Critics of the gaps in our nation’s health insurance decry the absence of a health insurance “system” and the resulting “patchwork” of private and public insurance that leaves so many Americans unprotected. There is no question that these gaps are unconscionable; but they are also no accident. They are the result of policy and political choices with substantial consequences for those who remain uncovered. In my view, (based on experience as well as the excellent scholarship of others) the fundamental political barrier to universal coverage is that our success in insuring most of the nation’s population has “crowded out” our political capacity to insure the rest. This paper will explain how we arrived at the mix of private and public insurance we now have, how that mix impedes efforts to achieve universal coverage, and how “crowd-out” affects strategy for improving coverage in the future.

Type
Symposium
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , Fall 2004 , pp. 461 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

See, e.g., Howard, C., The Hidden Welfare State (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997); Hacker, J., The Divided Welfare State (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Hacker, , supra note 1; Jost, T., Disentitlement? (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003); Klein, J., For All These Rights, (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Medicaid also supplements Medicare for its low-income elderly and the later-added disabled beneficiaries and provides long-term care to those who satisfy eligibility and financial requirements.Google Scholar
O’Brien, E. and Feder, J., Employer-based Health Insurance and Its Decline: The Growing Plight of Low-Wage Workers (Washington, D.C.: The Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, 1999).Google Scholar
For data on the uninsured, see The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, Health Insurance Coverage in America, 2002 Data Update, December 2003.Google Scholar
Stevens, R. and Stevens, R., Welfare Medicine in America: A Case Study of Medicaid (New York: New York Free Press, 1974).Google Scholar
As of 2001 Delaware, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Tennessee and Vermont, the Department of Health and Human Services had been granted waivers under section 1115 of the Social Security Act to cover childless, nondisabled adults. See The Medicaid Resource Book (Washington, D.C.: The Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, 2002): at 16–17.Google Scholar
The Congressional Budget Office ultimately judged this employer mandate to constitute a “tax,” though whether the public perceived it as such is an open question.Google Scholar
Medicare savings were dedicated to the proposal’s prescription drug and long-term care benefits.Google Scholar
Although the Congressional Budget Office did not find these and other projected savings entirely sufficient to finance the program, its estimates came close (and indeed were achievable with modest adjustments to some of the proposed benefits and subsidies).Google Scholar
Blendon, R. T., Brodie, M., and Benson, J., “What Happened to Americans’ Support for the Clinton Health Plan,” Health Affairs 14, no. 2 (1995): 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
For a discussion of this issue, see Feder, J., Levitt, L., O’Brien, E., and Rowland, D., “Assessing the Combination of Public Programs and Tax Credits,” Covering the Uninsured, (Washington, D.C.: Economic and Social Research Institute, 2001).Google Scholar
Cunningham, P. J., Reschovsky, J. D., and Hadley, J., The Effects of SCHIP on Children’s Health Insurance Coverage (Washington, D.C.: Center for the Study of Health Systems Change, 2002).Google ScholarPubMed
Baumgardner, J. R., “Providing Health Insurance to the Short-Term Unemployed,” Inquiry (1998): 266–279; Klerman, J. A., Uninsured and Unemployed: Policy Issues Raised by Expanded Coverage for Those Losing Health Insurance as a Result of Job Loss (Washington, D.C., RAND Mimeo, 1997).Google Scholar
Gruber, J. and Levitt, L., “Tax Subsidies for Health Insurance: Costs and Benefits,” Health Affairs 19, no. 1 (2000): 72–85.Google Scholar
Feder, et al, supra note 12.Google Scholar
Feder, et al, supra note 12.Google Scholar