Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T02:45:23.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Emergency Preparedness and Response for Disabled Individuals: Implications of Recent Litigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Extract

In an emergency, challenges faced by disabled individuals may be exacerbated by ineffective communication, power outages, transportation shortcomings, and inhospitable shelters. During Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, Gulf Coast shelters did not routinely provide closed captioning or sign language interpreters; for individuals with auditory disabilities, understanding instructions issued in these shelters was extremely difficult. Individuals with mobility-related disabilities experienced challenges evacuating from their homes due to public transportation that could not accommodate wheelchairs. After the hurricanes, difficulties arose in identifying wheelchair-accessible trailers and in communicating with disabled trailer residents. Failing to anticipate these challenges intensifies the disadvantaged situation of those with disabilities during an emergency.

Type
JLME Supplement
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

U.S. Department of Justice, “An ADA Guide for Local Governments,” available at <http://www.ada.gov/emergencyprepguide.htm> (last visited February 9, 2015); e.g., Ivey, S. L. Tseng, W. Dahrouge, D. et al., “Assessment of State- and Territorial-Level Preparedness Capacity for Serving Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Populations in Disasters,” Public Health Reports 129, no. 2 (2014): 148155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Council on Disability, The Impact of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita on People with Disabilities (2006).Google Scholar
Hoffman, S., “Preparing for Disaster: Protecting the Most Vulnerable in Emergencies,” U.C. Davis Law Review 42, no. 5 (2009): 14911547.Google Scholar
Childress, J. F. Faden, R. R. Gaare, R. D. et al., “Public Health Ethics: Mapping the Terrain,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 30, no. 2 (2002): 170178; Powers, M. Faden, R. R., Social Justice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice, A Guide to Disability Rights Laws (2009).Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (1990).Google Scholar
Id. § 12132.Google Scholar
Hensel, W. F. Wolf, L. E., “Playing God: The Legality of Plans Denying Scarce Resources to People with Disabilities in Public Health Emergencies,” Florida Law Review 63, no. 3 (2011): 719770; Congressional Research Service, The Americans with Disabilities Act and Emergency Preparedness and Response (2010).Google Scholar
E.g., Cal. Civ. Code § 54–55.32 (2014); New York State Division of Human Rights, New York State Human Rights Laws (2014).Google Scholar
Communities Actively Living Independent and Free v. City of Los Angeles, 2011 WL 4595993 (C.D.Cal. 2011).Google Scholar
Order re: Injunctive Relief, Communities Actively Living Independent and Free v. City of Los Angeles (2011).Google Scholar
Brooklyn Center for Independence of the Disabled v. Bloomberg, 980 F.Supp.2d 588 (S.D.N.Y. 2013).Google Scholar
National Council on Disability, supra note 2.Google Scholar
See Hoffman, , supra note 3.Google Scholar
See Childress, et al., supra note 4; Powers, Faden, , supra note 4.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice, An ADA Guide, supra note 1; see Childress, et al., supra note 4.Google Scholar
Gershon, R. R. Kraus, L. E. Raveis, V. H. et al., “Emergency Preparedness in a Sample of Persons with Disabilities,” American Journal of Disaster Medicine 8, no. 1 (2013): 3547; Uscher-Pines, L. Hausman, A. J. Powell, S. et al., “Disaster Preparedness of Households with Special Needs in Southeastern Pennsylvania,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 37, no. 3 (2009): 227–230.Google Scholar