Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T17:47:27.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

System-Congruity and the participles of Modern German and Modern English: A study in natural morphology. By Robert Bloomer. (Beiträge zur germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft, 6.) Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag, 1994. Pp. viii, 124. Paper. DM 58,00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

David Fertig
David Fertig
Affiliation:
Department of Modern Languages and Literatures910 Clemens HallState University of New YorkBuffalo, NY 14260 [fertig@acsu.buffalo.edu]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , Fall 1996 , pp. 312 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, Henning. 1980. Morphological change: Towards a typology. Historical morphology, ed. by Fisiak, Jacek, 1–50. (Trends in linguistics. Studies and monographs, 17.) New York: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bittner, Andreas. 1985. Wie schwach sind die starken Verben? Überlegungen und Vorschläge zu einer Klassifizierung der neuhochdeutschen Verben. Linguistische Studien, Reihe A 126.51–75.Google Scholar
[DWb.] Grimm, Jacob and Grimm, Wilhelm. 1854–1971. Deutsches Wörterbuch. 33 vols. Leipzig: Hirzel.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1986. Principles of historical linguistics. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluge, Friedrich. 1975. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. 21st edn. by Mitzka, Walther. New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Morpurgo Davies, Anna. 1978. Analogy, segmentation and the early neogrammarians. Transactions of the Philological Society 1978.36–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[OED] The compact edition of the Oxford English dictionary: Complete text reproduced micrographically. 1971. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1960. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. 6th edn.Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1992. Deutsches Wörterbuch. 9th edn. by Henne, Helmut and Objartel, Georg. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich. 1984. Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit: Ein Beitrag zur morphologischen Theoriebildung. (Studia grammatica, 21.) Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar