Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T00:42:38.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Braginskii magnetohydrodynamics for arbitrary magnetic topologies: coronal applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2017

D. MacTaggart Open the ORCID record for D. MacTaggart [Opens in a new window] ,
L. Vergori  and
J. Quinn
D. MacTaggart*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8SQ, UK
L. Vergori
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8SQ, UK Dipartimento di Ingegneria, Università di Perugia, via Goffredo Duranti 93, 06125, Perugia, Italy
J. Quinn
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8SQ, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: david.mactaggart@glasgow.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigate single-fluid magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) with anisotropic viscosity, often referred to as Braginskii MHD, with a particular eye to solar coronal applications. First, we examine the full Braginskii viscous tensor in the single-fluid limit. We pay particular attention to how the Braginskii tensor behaves as the magnetic field strength vanishes. The solar corona contains a magnetic field with a complex and evolving topology, so the viscosity must revert to its isotropic form when the field strength is zero, e.g. at null points. We highlight that the standard form in which the Braginskii tensor is written is not suitable for inclusion in simulations as singularities in the individual terms can develop. Instead, an altered form, where the parallel and perpendicular tensors are combined, provides the required asymptotic behaviour in the weak-field limit. We implement this combined form of the tensor into the Lare3D code, which is widely used for coronal simulations. Since our main focus is the viscous heating of the solar corona, we drop the drift terms of the Braginskii tensor. In a stressed null point simulation, we discover that small-scale structures, which develop very close to the null, lead to anisotropic viscous heating at the null itself (that is, heating due to the anisotropic terms in the viscosity tensor). The null point simulation we present has a much higher resolution than many other simulations containing null points, so this excess heating is a practical concern in coronal simulations. To remedy this unwanted heating at the null point, we develop a model for the viscosity tensor that captures the most important physics of viscosity in the corona: parallel viscosity for strong fields and isotropic viscosity at null points. We derive a continuum model of viscosity where momentum transport, described by this viscosity model, has the magnetic field as its preferred orientation. When the field strength is zero, there is no preferred direction for momentum transport and viscosity reverts to the standard isotropic form. The most general viscous stress tensor of a (single-fluid) plasma satisfying these conditions is found. It is shown that the Braginskii model, without the drift terms, is a specialization of the general model. Performing the stressed null point simulation with this simplified model of viscosity reveals very similar heating profiles to those of the full Braginskii model. The new model, however, does not produce anisotropic heating at the null point, as required. Since the vast majority of coronal simulations use only isotropic viscosity, we perform the stressed null point simulation with isotropic viscosity and compare the heating profiles to those of the anisotropic models. It is shown that the fully isotropic viscosity can overestimate the viscous heating by an order of magnitude.

JFM classification

MHD and Electrohydrodynamics: MHD and Electrohydrodynamics
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 826 , 10 September 2017 , pp. 615 - 635
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arber, T. D., Longbottom, A. W., Gerrard, C. L. & Milne, A. M. 2001 A staggered grid, Lagrangian–Eulerian remap code for 3-D MHD simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 171, 151–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, C. K. & Craig, I. J. D. 2013 Visco-resistive dissipation in transient reconnection driven by the Orzag–Tang vortex. Solar Phys. 283, 463–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, C. K. & Craig, I. J. D. 2014 Visco-resistive dissipation in strongly driven transient reconnection. Solar Phys. 289, 869–877.Google Scholar
Armstrong, C. K., Craig, I. J. D. & Litvinenko, Y. E. 2011 Viscous effects in time-dependent planar reconnection. Astron. Astrophys. 534, A25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bale, S. D., Kasper, J. C., Howes, G. G., Quataert, E., Salem, C. & Sundkvist, D. 2009 Magnetic fluctuation power near proton temperature anisotropy instability thresholds in the solar wind. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 211101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bareford, M. R. & Hood, A. W. 2015 Shock heating in numerical simulations of kink-unstable coronal loops. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 373, 20140266.Google Scholar
Berlok, T. & Pessah, M. E. 2015 Plasma instabilities in the context of current helium sedimentation models: dynamical implications for the ICM in galaxy clusters. Astrophys. J. 813, 22.Google Scholar
Bogaert, E. & Goossens, M. 1991 The visco-resistive stability of arcades in the corona of the Sun. Solar Phys. 132, 109–124.Google Scholar
Bowness, R., Hood, A. W. & Parnell, C. E. 2013 Coronal heating and nonflares: current sheet formation and heating. Astron. Astrophys. 560, A89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braginskii, S. I. 1965 Transport processes in a plasma. Rev. Plasma Phys. 1, 205–311.Google Scholar
Chew, G. F., Goldberger, M. L. & Low, F. E. 1956 The Boltzman equation and the one-fluid hydrodynamic equations in the absence of particle collisions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 236, 112–118.Google Scholar
Craig, I. J. D. 2010 Anisotropic viscous dissipation in transient reconnecting plasmas. Astron. Astrophys. 515, A96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, I. J. D. & Litvinenko, Y. E. 2010 Energy losses by anisotropic viscous dissipation in transient magnetic reconnection. Astrophys. J. 725, 886–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorfmann, A., Ogden, R. W. & Wineman, A. S. 2007 A three-dimensional non-linear constitutive law for magnetorheological fluids, with applications. Intl J. Non-Linear Mech. 42, 381–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epperlein, E. M. & Haines, M. G. 1986 Plasma transport coefficients in a magnetic field by direct numerical solution of the Fokker–Planck equation. Phys. Plasmas 29, 1029–1041.Google Scholar
Ericksen, J. L. 1960 Transversely isotropic fluids. Kolloid-Zeitschrift 173, 117–122.Google Scholar
Galsgaard, K. & Pontin, D. I. 2011 Steady state reconnection at a single 3D magnetic null point. Astron. Astrophys. 529, A20.Google Scholar
Gasser, T. C., Ogden, R. W. & Holzapfel, G. A. 2006 Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations. J. R. Soc. Interface 3, 15–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogan, J. T. 1984 Collisional transport of momentum in axisymmetric configurations. Phys. Fluids 27, 2308–2312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollweg, J. V. 1985 Viscosity in a magnetized plasma: physical interpretation. J. Geophys. Res. 90, 7620–7622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollweg, J. V. 1986 Viscosity and the Chew–Goldberger–Low equations in the solar corona. Astrophys. J. 306, 730–739.Google Scholar
Holzapfel, G. A. 2000 Nonlinear Solid Mechanics: A Continuum Approach for Engineering. Wiley.Google Scholar
Hood, A. W., Cargill, P. J., Browning, P. K. & Tam, K. V. 2016 An MHD avalanche in a multi-threaded coronal loop. Astrophys. J. 817, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, A. W., van der Linden, R. & Goossens, M. 1989 A formulation of non-ideal localized (or ballooning) modes in the solar corona. Solar Phys. 120, 261–283.Google Scholar
Kotelnikov, I. A. 2012 Braginskii and Balescu kinetic coefficients for electrons in a Lorentzian plasma. Plasma Phys. Rep. 38, 608–619.Google Scholar
Kunz, M. W., Bogdanović, T., Reynolds, C. S. & Stone, J. 2012 Buoyancy instabilities in a weakly collisional intracluster medium. Astrophys. J. 754, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Linden, R., Goossens, M. & Hood, A. W. 1988 The effects of parallel and perpendicular viscosity on resistive ballooning modes in line-tied coronal magnetic fields. Solar Phys. 115, 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacTaggart, D., Guglielmino, S. L., Haynes, A. L., Simitev, R. & Zuccarello, F. 2015 The magnetic structure of surges in small-scale emerging active regions. Astron. Astrophys. 576, A4.Google Scholar
MacTaggart, D. & Haynes, A. L. 2014 On magnetic reconnection and flux rope topology in solar flux emergence. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 438, 1500–1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Napoli, G. & Vergori, L. 2012 Surface free energies for nematic shells. Phys. Rev. E 85, 061701.Google Scholar
Ofman, L., Davila, J. M. & Steinolfson, R. S. 1994 Coronal heating by the resonant absorption of Alfvén waves: the effect of viscous stress tensor. Astrophys. J. 421, 360–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pontin, D. I., Bhattacharjee, A. & Galsgaard, K. 2007 Current sheet formation and nonideal behaviour at three-dimensional magnetic null points. Phys. Plasmas 14, 052106.Google Scholar
Priest, E. R. 2014 Magnetohydrodynamics of the Sun. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruderman, M. S., Verwichte, E., Erdélyi, R. & Goossens, M. 1996 Dissipative instability of MHD tangential discontinuity in magnetized plasmas with anisotropic viscosity and thermal conductivity. Phys. Plasmas 56, 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos-Lima, R., de Gouveia Dal Pino, E. M., Kowal, G., Falceta-Gonçalves, D., Lazarian, A. & Nakawacki, M. S. 2014 Magnetic field amplification and evolution in turbulent collisionless magnetohydrodynamics: an application to the intracluster medium. Astrophys. J. 781, 84.Google Scholar
Santos-Lima, R., Yan, H., de Gouveia Dal Pino, E. M. & Lazarian, A. 2016 Limits on the ion temperature anisotropy in the turbulent intracluster medium. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 460, 2492–2504.Google Scholar
Schekochihin, A. A. & Cowley, S. C. 2006 Turbulence, magnetic fields and plasma physics in clusters of galaxies. Phys. Plasmas 13, 056501.Google Scholar
Sonnerup, B. U. O. & Priest, E. R. 1975 Resistive MHD stagnation-point flows at a current sheet. J. Plasma Phys. 14, 283–294.Google Scholar
Spencer, A. J. M. 1971 Theory of invariants. In Continuum Physics (ed. Eringen, A. C.), vol. 1, pp. 239–353. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Spitzer, L. & Härm, R. 1953 Transport phenomena in a completely ionized gas. Phys. Rev. 89, 977–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tam, K. V., Hood, A. W., Browning, P. K. & Cargill, P. J. 2015 Coronal heating in multiple magnetic threads. Astron. Astrophys. 580, A122.Google Scholar