Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T00:01:03.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Proprietary Knowledge Protection and Product Market Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2022

Justin Hung Nguyen*
Affiliation:
Massey University, Massey Business School
Peter Pham
Affiliation:
UNSW Sydney, Institute of Global Finance and School of Banking and Finance peter.pham@unsw.edu.au
Buhui Qiu
Affiliation:
University of Sydney, University of Sydney Business School buhui.qiu@sydney.edu.au
*
J.Nguyen@massey.ac.nz (corresponding author)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Does proprietary knowledge protection (PKP) spur or hinder the product-market performance of new firms? Exploiting the staggered adoptions of the inevitable disclosure doctrine by U.S. State Courts, which enhance PKP, we show that treated firms increase industry-adjusted sales growth by 2% compared to control firms. The effect is concentrated among small and young firms and increases with the scope of proprietary knowledge and rivals’ access to external finance. PKP encourages firms to develop new products and stimulates initial public offering activity. Our results suggest that PKP alleviates predation risk associated with “deep-pocket” rivals by allowing firms to maintain competitive advantages.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Footnotes

We thank Sandy Klasa (the referee) and seminar participants at Victoria University of Wellington, Massey University, Auckland University of Technology, and the University of Auckland for their helpful comments and suggestions. All errors are our own.

References

Almeida, P., and Kogut, B.. “Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks.” Management Science, 45 (1999), 905917.Google Scholar
Angrist, J. D., and Pischke, J.-S.. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press (2008).Google Scholar
Aobdia, D.Employee Mobility, Noncompete Agreements, Product-Market Competition, and Company Disclosure.” Review of Accounting Studies, 23 (2018), 296346.Google Scholar
Bai, J. J.; Fairhurst, D.; and Serfling, M.. “Employment Protection, Investment, and Firm Growth.” Review of Financial Studies, 33 (2019), 644688.Google Scholar
Belo, F.; Li, J.; Lin, X.; and Zhao, X.. “Labor-Force Heterogeneity and Asset Prices: The Importance of Skilled Labor.” Review of Financial Studies, 30 (2017), 36693709.Google Scholar
Billett, M. T.; Garfinkel, J. A.; and Yu, M.. “The Effect of Asymmetric Information on Product Market Outcomes.” Journal of Financial Economics, 123 (2017), 357376.Google Scholar
Bolton, P., and Scharfstein, D. S.. “A Theory of Predation Based on Agency Problems in Financial Contracting.” American Economic Review, 80 (1990), 93106.Google Scholar
Bryan, M.Reconceptualising the Debate on Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Development.” Law and Development Review, 3 (2010), 64106.Google Scholar
Campello, M.Capital Structure and Product Markets Interactions: Evidence from Business Cycles.” Journal of Financial Economics, 68 (2003), 353378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campello, M.Debt Financing: Does It Boost or Hurt Firm Performance in Product Markets?Journal of Financial Economics, 82 (2006), 135172.Google Scholar
Carlino, G. A. “Do Non-Compete Covenants Influence State Startup Activity? Evidence from the Michigan Experiment.” FRB of Philadelphia Working Paper No. 21-26 (2021).Google Scholar
Chen, D.; Gao, H.; and Ma, Y.. “Human Capital Driven Acquisition: Evidence from the Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine.” Management Science, 67 (2020), 46435300.Google Scholar
Dye, R. A.Proprietary and Nonproprietary Disclosures.” Journal of Business, 59 (1986), 331366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisfeldt, A., and Papanikolaou, D.. “Organization Capital and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns.” Journal of Finance, 68 (2013), 13651406.Google Scholar
Ellis, J. A.; Fee, C. E.; and Thomas, S.. “Proprietary Costs and the Disclosure of Information About Customers.” Journal of Accounting Research, 50 (2012), 685727.Google Scholar
Fresard, L.Financial Strength and Product Market Behavior: The Real Effects of Corporate Cash Holdings.” Journal of Finance, 65 (2010), 10971122.Google Scholar
Galasso, A., and Schankerman, M.. “Patents and Cumulative Innovation: Causal Evidence from the Courts.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130 (2015), 317369.Google Scholar
Garmaise, M. J.Ties that Truly Bind: Noncompetition Agreements, Executive Compensation, and Firm Investment.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 27 (2011), 376425.Google Scholar
Glaeser, S.The Effects of Proprietary Information on Corporate Disclosure and Transparency: Evidence from Trade Secrets.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 66 (2018), 163193.Google Scholar
Gould, D., and Gruben, W.. “The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Economic Growth.” Journal of Development Economics, 48 (1996), 323350.Google Scholar
Hoberg, G., and Phillips, G.. “Text-Based Network Industries and Endogenous Product Differentiation.” Journal of Political Economy, 124 (2016), 14231465.Google Scholar
Hoberg, G.; Phillips, G.; and Prabhala, N.. “Product Market Threats, Payouts, and Financial Flexibility.” Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 293324.Google Scholar
Huang, K. G., and Murray, F. E.. “Does Patent Strategy Shape the Long-Run Supply of Public Knowledge? Evidence from Human Genetics.” Academy of Management Journal, 52 (2009), 11931221.Google Scholar
Hyde, A.Working in Silicon Valley: Economic and Legal Analysis of a High-Velocity Labor Market.” Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge (2003).Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. B.; Trajtenberg, M.; and Henderson, R.. “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108 (1993), 577598.Google Scholar
Jeffers, J. “The Impact of Restricting Labor Mobility on Corporate Investment and Entrepreneurship.” Working Paper, HEC Paris (2019).Google Scholar
Klasa, S.; Ortiz-Molina, H.; Serfling, M.; and Srinivasan, S.. “Protection of Trade Secrets and Capital Structure Decisions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 128 (2018), 266286.Google Scholar
Lanen, W., and Verrecchia, R.. “Operating Decisions and the Disclosure of Management Accounting Information.” Journal of Accounting Research, 25 (1987), 165193.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. M., and Tan, Y.. “Debt-Equity Choices, R&D Investment and Market Timing.” Journal of Financial Economics, 119 (2016), 599610.Google Scholar
Li, Y.; Lin, Y.; and Zhang, L.. “Trade Secrets Law and Corporate Disclosure: Causal Evidence on the Proprietary Cost Hypothesis.” Journal of Accounting Research, 56 (2018), 265308.Google Scholar
Loughran, T., and McDonald, B.. “Textual Analysis in Accounting and Finance: A Survey.” Journal of Accounting Research, 54 (2016), 11871230.Google Scholar
Matusik, S. F., and Hill, C. W. L.. “The Utilization of Contingent Work, Knowledge Creation, and Competitive Advantage.” Academy of Management Review, 23 (1998), 680697.Google Scholar
McAdams, J. M., “Non-Compete Agreements: A Review of the Literature.” Working Paper, Federal Trade Commission Bureau of Economics (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, A.; Singh, M.; and Zaldokas, A.. “Do Corporate Taxes Hinder Innovation?Journal of Financial Economics, 124 (2017), 195221.Google Scholar
Murray, F., and Stern, S.. “Do Formal Intellectual Property Rights Hinder the Free Flow of Scientific Knowledge? An Empirical Test of The Anti-Commons Hypothesis.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63 (2007), 648687.Google Scholar
Park, W., and Ginarte, J. C.. “Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth.” Contemporary Economic Policy, 15 (1997), 5161.Google Scholar
Pirinsky, C., and Wang, Q.. “Does Corporate Headquarters Location Matter for Stock Returns?Journal of Finance, 61 (2006), 19912015.Google Scholar
Png, I. P., and Samila, S.. “Trade Secrets Law and Mobility: Evidence from ‘Inevitable Disclosure’.” Working Paper, available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1986775 (2015).Google Scholar
Qiu, B., and Wang, T.. “Does Knowledge Protection Benefit Shareholders? Evidence from Stock Market Reaction and Firm Investment in Knowledge Assets.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 53 (2018), 13411370.Google Scholar
Qiu, Y., and Wang, T. Y.. “Skilled Labor Risk and Corporate Policies.” Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 10 (2021), 437472.Google Scholar
Samila, S., and Sorenson, O.. “Venture Capital, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Growth.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 93 (2011), 338349.Google Scholar
Starr, E.; Balasubramanian, N.; and Sakakibara, M.. “Screening Spinouts? How Noncompete Enforceability Affects the Creation, Growth, and Survival of New Firms.” Management Science, 64 (2018), 552572.Google Scholar
Starr, E.; Frake, J.; and Agarwal, R.. “Mobility Constraint Externalities.” Organization Science, 30 (2019), 961980.Google Scholar
Valta, P.Competition and the Cost of Debt.” Journal of Financial Economics, 105 (2012), 661682.Google Scholar
Verrecchia, R. E.Discretionary Disclosure.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5 (1983), 179194.Google Scholar
Verrecchia, R. E., and Weber, J.. “Redacted Disclosure.” Journal of Accounting Research, 44 (2006), 791814.Google Scholar
Williams, H.Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation: Evidence from the Human Genome.” Journal of Political Economy, 121 (2013), 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Nguyen et al. supplementary material

Appendix

Download Nguyen et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 185.9 KB