Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T19:00:31.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Functional Forms and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Bill McDonald
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The traditional Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) provides a foundation for the estimation of systematic risk that has been applied extensively in studies of investment performance, market efficiency, predictive models, and capital budgeting, to name only a few. Lee [10] considered a special case of nonlinearities occurring in the estimation of systematic risk within the context of the investment horizon problem. His findings, based on a limited sample, provided significant methodological implications for the estimation process and have received wide readership through republication of the study in a readings text [6].

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , September 1983 , pp. 319 - 329
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Bey, Roger P., and Pinches, George E.. “Additional Evidence of Heteroscedasticity in the Market Model.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 15 (06 1980), pp. 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Box, G. E. P., and Cox, D. R.. “An Analysis of Transformations.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, series B, Vol. 26 (04 1964), pp. 211–243.Google Scholar
[3]Cheng, P. L., and Deets, M. K.. “Systematic Risk and the Horizon Problem.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 8 (03 1973), pp. 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Fabozzi, F.; Francis, J.; and Lee, C. F.. “Generalized Functional Form for Mutual Fund Returns.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 15 (12 1980), pp. 1107–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Ferguson, C. E.The Neoclassical Theory of Production and Distribution. London: Cambridge Press (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Francis, J. C; Farrar, D. E.; and Lee, C. F.. Readings in Investments. New York: McGraw-Hill (1980).Google Scholar
[7]Gemmill, G. “Using the Box-Cox Form for Estimating Demand: A Comment.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 62 (02 1980), pp. 147–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Jensen, M. C. “Risk, the Pricing of Capital Assets, and the Evaluation of Investment Portfolios.” Journal of Business, Vol. 42 (04 1969), pp. 167–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Kmenta, J.Elements of Econometrics. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co. (1971).Google Scholar
[10]Lee, C. F. “Investment Horizon and the Functional Form of the Capital Asset Pricing Model.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 58 (08 1976), pp. 356–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Lee, C. F. “Functional Form, Skewness Effect, and the Risk Return Relationship.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 12 (03 1977), pp. 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Levy, H. “Portfolio Performance and the Investment Horizon.” Management Science, Vol. 18 (08 1972), pp. B645–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Reinganum, M. R. “A Direct Test of Roll's Conjecture on the Firm Size Effect.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 37 (03 1982), pp. 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Roll, R. “A Possible Explanation of the Small Firm Effect.” Working paper, University of California at Los Angeles (1980).Google Scholar
[15]Spitzer, J. “The Demand for Money, the Liquidity Trap, and Functional Forms.” International Economic Review, Vol. 17 (02 1976), pp. 220–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Spitzer, J. “A Monte Carlo Investigation of the Box-Cox Transformation in Small Samples.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 73 (09 1978), pp. 488–495.Google Scholar
[17]Zarembka, P.Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press (1974).Google Scholar