Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:33:55.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Information-Processing Cost Affect Firm-Specific Information Acquisition? Evidence from XBRL Adoption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2016

Yi Dong ,
Oliver Zhen Li ,
Yupeng Lin  and
Chenkai Ni
Yi Dong
Affiliation:
dong.yi@mail.shufe.edu.cn, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, School of Accounting, Shanghai 200433, China
Oliver Zhen Li
Affiliation:
bizzhenl@nus.edu.sg, National University of Singapore, Business School, Singapore 119245, Singapore
Yupeng Lin
Affiliation:
yupenlin@cityu.edu.hk, City University of Hong Kong, College of Business, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Chenkai Ni*
Affiliation:
nichenkai@rbs.org.cn, Renmin University of China, School of Business, Beijing 100872, China.
*
*Corresponding author: nichenkai@rbs.org.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine how information-processing cost affects investors’ acquisition of firm-specific information using a natural experiment resulting from a recent mandate requiring U.S. firms to adopt eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) when submitting filings to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). XBRL filings make financial data standardized, tagged, and machine readable. We find that XBRL adoption reduces firms’ stock return synchronicity. The reduction in synchronicity mainly applies to filings under the mandatory program as opposed to the voluntary program. Furthermore, such an effect is more pronounced for opaque and complex firms. Finally, we find that XBRL adoption also reduces price delay.

Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , April 2016 , pp. 435 - 462
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barth, M.; Kasznik, R.; and McNichols, M.. “Analyst Coverage and Intangible Assets.” Journal of Accounting Research, 39 (2001), 1–34.Google Scholar
Bertrand, M., and Mullainathan, S.. “Enjoying the Quiet Life? Corporate Governance and Managerial Preferences.” Journal of Political Economy, 111 (2003), 1043–1075.Google Scholar
Blankespoor, E. “The Impact of Investor Information Processing Costs on Firm Disclosure Choice: Evidence from the XBRL Mandate.” Working Paper, Stanford University (2012).Google Scholar
Blankespoor, E.; Miller, B.; andWhite, H.. “Initial Evidence on the Market Impact of the XBRL Mandate.” Review of Accounting Studies, 19 (2014), 1468–1503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, K., and Hameed, A.. “Stock Price Synchronicity and Analyst Following in Emerging Markets.” Journal of Financial Economics, 80 (2006), 115–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L., and Lou, D.. “Complicated Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 104 (2011), 383–400.Google Scholar
Crawford, S.; Roulstone, D.; and So, E.. “Analyst Initiations of Coverage and Stock Return Synchronicity.” Accounting Review, 87 (2012), 1527–1553.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, S.; Gan, J.; and Gao, N.. “Transparency, Price Informativeness, and Stock Return Synchronicity: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45 (2010), 1189–1220.Google Scholar
Dechow, P., and Dichev, I.. “The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: The Role of Accrual Estimation Errors.” Accounting Review, 77 (2002), 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durnev, A.; Morck, R.; and Yeung, B.. “Value Enhancing Capital Budgeting and Firm-Specific Stock Return Variation.” Journal of Finance, 59 (2004), 1461–1493.Google Scholar
Durnev, A.; Morck, R.; Yeung, B.; and Zarowin, P.. “Does Greater Firm-Specific Return Variation Mean More or Less Informed Stock Pricing?” Journal of Accounting Research, 41 (2003), 797–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, N., and Ferreira, M.. “Does International Cross-Listing Improve the Information Environment?” Journal of Financial Economics, 88 (2008), 216–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, M., and Laux, P.. “Corporate Governance, Idiosyncratic Risk, and Information Flow.” Journal of Finance, 62 (2007), 951–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, M.; Durnev, A.; Morck, R.; and Yeung, B.. “Law, Share Price Accuracy, and Economic Performance: The New Evidence.” Michigan Law Review, 102 (2003), 331–386.Google Scholar
Ghosh, D., and Whitecotton, S.. “Some Determinants of Analysts’ Forecast Accuracy.” Behavioral Research in Accounting, 9 (1997), 50–68.Google Scholar
Grossman, S., and Stiglitz, J.. “On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets.” American Economic Review, 70 (1980), 393–408.Google Scholar
Hou, K., and Moskowitz, T.. “Market Frictions, Price Delay, and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns.” Review of Financial Studies, 18 (2005), 981–1020.Google Scholar
Hutton, A.; Marcus, A.; and Tehranian, H.. “Opaque Financial Reports, R 2, and Crash Risk.” Journal of Financial Economics, 94 (2009), 67–86.Google Scholar
Iliev, P. “The Effect of SOX Section 404: Costs, Earnings Quality, and Stock Prices.” Journal of Finance, 65 (2010), 1163–1196.Google Scholar
Jin, L., and Myers, S.. “R 2 around the World: New Theory and New Tests.” Journal of Financial Economics, 79 (2006), 257–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J. “Earnings Management during Import Relief Investigation.” Journal of Accounting Research, 29 (1991), 193–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., and Shi, H.. “IFRS Reporting, Firm-Specific Information Flows, and Institutional Environments: International Evidence.” Review of Accounting Studies, 17 (2012), 474–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, B.; Rajgopal, S.; and Venkatachalam, M.. “R 2 and Idiosyncratic Risk Are Not Interchangeable.” Accounting Review, 89 (2014), 2261–2295.Google Scholar
Li, O.; Lin, Y.; and Ni, C.. “Does XBRL Adoption Reduce the Cost of Equity Capital?” Working Paper, National University of Singapore (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, M. “Analysts’ Incentives to Produce Industry-Level versus Firm-Specific Information.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46 (2011), 757–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y. “Consumption Dynamics under Information Processing Constraint.” Review of Economic Dynamics, 11 (2008), 366–385.Google Scholar
Luo, Y. “Rational Inattention, Long-Run Consumption Risk, and Portfolio Choice.” Review of Economic Dynamics, 13 (2010), 843–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maggio, M., and Pagano, M.. “Financial Disclosure with Costly Information Processing.” Working Paper, Columbia University and University of Naples Federico II (2012).Google Scholar
Morck, R.; Yeung, B.; and Yu, W.. “The Information Content of Stock Markets: Why Do Emerging Markets Have Synchronous Stock Price Movements?” Journal of Financial Economics, 58 (2000), 215–260.Google Scholar
Peng, L. “Learning with Information Capacity Constraints.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40 (2005), 307–329.Google Scholar
Peng, L., and Xiong, W.. “Investor Attention, Overconfidence and Category Learning.” Journal of Financial Economics, 80 (2006), 563–602.Google Scholar
Piotroski, J., and Roulstone, B.. “The Influence of Analysts, Institutional Investors, and Insiders on the Incorporation of Market, Industry, and Firm-Specific Information into Stock Prices.” Accounting Review, 79 (2004), 1119–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roll, R. “R 2.” Journal of Finance, 43 (1988), 541–566.Google Scholar
Securities and Exchange Commission. “XBRL Voluntary Financial Reporting on the EDGAR System.” http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-8529.htm (2005).Google Scholar
Securities and Exchange Commission. “Interactive Data to Improve Financial Reporting.” http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2009/33-9002.pdf (2009).Google Scholar
Sims, C. A. “Implications of Rational Inattention.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 50 (2003), 665–690.Google Scholar
Sims, C. A. “Rational Inattention: Beyond the Linear-Quadratic Case.” American Economic Review, 96 (2006), 158–163.Google Scholar
Thistlethwaite, D., and Campbell, D.. “Regression–Discontinuity Analysis: An Alternative to the Ex Post Facto Experiment.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 51 (1960), 309–317.Google Scholar
Veldkamp, L. “Information Markets and the Comovement of Asset Prices.” Review of Economic Studies, 70 (2006), 823–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar