Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T21:51:04.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Common Lender, Ex-Banker Director, and Corporate Investment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2023

Kentaro Asai*
Affiliation:
Australian National University College of Business and Economics
Thao Hoang
Affiliation:
Australian National University College of Business and Economics thao.hoang@anu.edu.au
Takeshi Yamada
Affiliation:
Australian National University College of Business and Economics takeshi.yamada@anu.edu.au
*
kentaro.asai@anu.edu.au (corresponding author)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Due to the government-driven mergers of large banks, many competing firms in Japan ended up borrowing from a common lender. Using firm-level data, we find that the capital investments of competing firms that share a common lender decrease by 15% of the mean. When a common lender can exercise its voice through its former employees serving as firms’ executive directors, investments fall significantly further. Competing firms that share a common lender increase markups and profitability ratios, suggesting that the lender induces strategic coordination among its borrowers to reduce their competitive pressures. Firms use saved resources from weaker competition for cash cushions.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Footnotes

We thank an anonymous referee, Allen Berger, Arnoud Boot, Richard Boylan, Stephen Brown (discussant), Ben Charoenwong, Dong Beom Choi (discussant), Hans Degryse, Mara Faccio (the editor), Bruce Grundy, Richard Hynes, Kei Kawai, Randall Morck, Phong Ngo, Greg Nini, Farzad Saidi, David Smith, Daniel Streitz, Xianming Zhou, and seminar participants at the Australian National University, the Reserve Bank of Australia, and Queensland University of Technology. We also thank participants at the 2021 Financial Intermediation Research Society (FIRS) Annual Meeting, the 2021 FIRN Annual Meeting, and the 2022 Conference on Empirical Legal Studies (CELS). We acknowledge financial support from the Australian National University Research School of Finance Actuarial Studies and Statistics. Any remaining errors are ours.

References

Akdoğu, E., and MacKay, P.. “Investment and Competition.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43 (2008), 299330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antón, M.; Ederer, F.; Giné, M.; and Schmalz, M. C.. “Innovation: The Bright Side of Common Ownership?” Working Paper, available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3099578 (2021).Google Scholar
Antón, M.; Ederer, F.; Giné, M.; and Schmalz, M. C.. “Common Ownership, Competition, and Top Management Incentives.” Journal of Political Economy, 131 (2023), 12941355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkhangelsky, D., and Imbens, G.. “The Role of the Propensity Score in Fixed Effect Models.” NBER Working Paper No. w24814 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azar, J.; Schmalz, M. C.; and Tecu, I.. “Anticompetitive Effects of Common Ownership.” Journal of Finance, 73 (2018), 15131565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backus, M.; Conlon, C.; and Sinkinson, M.. “Common Ownership and Competition in the Ready-to-Eat Cereal Industry.” NBER Working Paper No. 28350 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bank of Japan. “Changes in the Corporate Balance-sheet Structure Since 1980 in Japan.” Quarterly Bulletin, 4 (1996), 5998.Google Scholar
Bikker, J. A., and Haaf, K.. “Competition, Concentration and Their Relationship: An Empirical Analysis of the Banking Industry.” Journal of Banking & Finance, 26 (2002), 21912214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borochin, P.; Yang, J.; and Zhang, R.. “Common Ownership Types and Their Effects on Innovation and Competition.” Working Paper, available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3204767 (2020).Google Scholar
Brander, J. A., and Lewis, T. R.. “Oligopoly and Financial Structure: The Limited Liability Effect.” American Economic Review, 76 (1986), 956970.Google Scholar
Bryson, A.; Dorsett, R.; and Purdon, S.. “The Use of Propensity Score Matching in the Evaluation of Active Labour Market Policies.” LSE Library, London School of Economics and Political Science (2002).Google Scholar
Cetorelli, N., and Strahan, P. E.. “Finance as a Barrier to Entry: Bank Competition and Industry Structure in Local US Markets.” Journal of Finance, 61 (2006), 437461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chava, S.; Wang, R.; and Zou, H.. “Covenants, Creditors’ Simultaneous Equity Holdings, and Firm Investment Policies.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 54 (2019), 481512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chirinko, R. S., and Elston, J. A.. “Finance, Control and Profitability: The Influence of German Banks.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 59 (2006), 6988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deneckere, R., and Davidson, C.. “Incentives to Form Coalitions with Bertrand Competition.” RAND Journal of Economics, 16 (1985), 473486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmann, I.; Maug, E.; and Schneider, C.. “Bankers on the Boards of German Firms: What They Do, What They Are Worth, and Why They Are (Still) There.” Review of Finance, 14 (2010), 3571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economist. “Regrouping.” Economist (2000).Google Scholar
Fernholz, R. T., and Koch, C.. “Why Are Big Banks Getting Bigger?” Working Paper No. 1604, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, M. A., and Matos, P.. “Universal Banks and Corporate Control: Evidence from the Global Syndicated Loan Market.” Review of Financial Studies, 25 (2012), 27032744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilje, E. P.; Gormley, T. A.; and Levit, D.. “Who’s Paying Attention? Measuring Common Ownership and Its Impact on Managerial Incentives.” Journal of Financial Economics, 137 (2020), 152178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, G., and Philippon, T.. “Declining Competition and Investment in the US.” NBER Working Paper No. 23583 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heywood, J. S., and McGinty, M.. “Convex Costs and the Merger Paradox Revisited.” Economic Inquiry, 45 (2007), 342349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirano, K.; Imbens, G. W.; and Ridder, G.. “Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score.” Econometrica, 71 (2003), 11611189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoshi, T.What Happened to Japanese Banks?Monetary and Economic Studies, 19 (2001), 130.Google Scholar
Hosono, K.; Sakai, K.; and Tsuru, K.. “Consolidation of Banks in Japan: Causes and Consequences.” In Financial Sector Development in the Pacific Rim, Ito, T. and Rose, A. K., eds. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (2009), 265309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbens, G. W., and Rubin, D. B.. Causal Inference in Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbens, G. W., and Wooldridge, J. M.. “Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation.” Journal of Economic Literature, 47 (2009), 586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janicki, H., and Prescott, E. S.. “Changes in the Size Distribution of US Banks: 1960–2005.” FRB Richmond Economic Quarterly, 92 (2006), 291316.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. N., and Minton, B. A.. “Appointments of Outsiders to Japanese Boards: Determinants and Implications for Managers.” Journal of Financial Economics, 36 (1994), 225258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroszner, R. S., and Strahan, P. E.. “Bankers on Boards: Monitoring, Conflicts of Interest, and Lender Liability.” Journal of Financial Economics, 62 (2001), 415452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laeven, L.; Ratnovski, L.; and Tong, H.. “Bank Size, Capital, and Systemic Risk: Some International Evidence.” Journal of Banking & Finance, 69 (2016), S25S34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, J., and Shimotani, M.. “Business Networks in Postwar Japan: Whither the Keiretsu?” In The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups, Colpan, A. M., Hikino, T., and Lincoln, J. R., eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2010), 133.Google Scholar
López, Á. L., and Vives, X.. “Overlapping Ownership, R&D Spillovers, and Antitrust Policy.” Journal of Political Economy, 127 (2019), 23942437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miwa, Y., and Ramseyer, J. M.. The Fable of the Keiretsu: Urban Legends of the Japanese Economy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morck, R., and Nakamura, M.. “Banks and Corporate Control in Japan.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 319339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakaso, H. “The Financial Crisis in Japan During the 1990s: How the Bank of Japan Responded and the Lessons Learnt.” BIS Paper No.6, Bank of International Settlement (2001).Google Scholar
Park, A. H., and Seo, K.. “Common Ownership and Product Market Competition: Evidence from the US Airline Industry.” Korean Journal of Financial Studies, 48 (2019), 617640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, M. K., and Porter, R. H.. “Oligopoly and the Incentive for Horizontal Merger.” American Economic Review, 75 (1985), 219227.Google Scholar
Poitevin, M.Collusion and the Banking Structure of a Duopoly.” Canadian Journal of Economics, 22 (1989), 263277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saidi, F., and Streitz, D.. “Bank Concentration and Product Market Competition.” Review of Financial Studies, 34 (2021), 49995035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salant, S. W.; Switzer, S.; and Reynolds, R. J.. “Losses from Horizontal Merger: The Effects of an Exogenous Change in Industry Structure on Cournot–Nash Equilibrium.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98 (1983), 185199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, U.Foreign Acquisition and Credit Risk: Evidence from the U.S. CDS Market.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 58 (2023), 17341767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Asai et al. supplementary material

Online Appendix
Download Asai et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 162.8 KB