Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:55:38.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of the Term Structure of Implied Volatilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Ronald Heynen ,
Angelien Kemna  and
Ton Vorst
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

From various empirical work, it is well known that the volatility of asset returns changes over time. This might be one of the reasons that implied volatilities differ for options that only differ in time to maturity. We construct models for the relation between short- and long-term implied volatilities based on three different assumptions of stock return volatility behavior, i.e., mean-reverting, GARCH, and EGARCH models. We test these relations on option price data and conclude that EGARCH gives the best description of asset prices and the term structure of options' implied volatilities.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , March 1994 , pp. 31 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akaike, H. “Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle.” In 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory, Petrov, B. N. and Czaki, F., eds. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado (1973), 267–281.Google Scholar
Akgiray, V. “Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Time Series of Stock Returns: Evidence and Forecasts.” Journal of Business, 62 (01 1989), 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baillie, R. T., and DeGennaro, R. P.. “Stock Returns and Volatility.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2 (06 1990), 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, F. “Studies of Stock Price Volatility Changes.” In Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section. American Statistical Association, (1976), 177–181.Google Scholar
Black, F., and Scholes, M. J.. “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities.” Journal of Political Economy, 81 (05 1973), 637–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollerslev, T. “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity.” Journal of Econometrics, 31 (04 1986) 307–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chou, R. Y. “Volatility Persistence and Stock Valuations: Some Empirical Evidence Using Garch.” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 3 (10 1988), 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, A. “The Stochastic Behavior of Common Stock Variances.” Journal of Financial Economics, 10 (12 1982), 407–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J. C., and Ross, S. A.. “The Valuation of Options for Alternative Stochastic Processes.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (01 1976), 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, F.; Kemna, A.; and Kloek, T.. “A Contribution to Event Study Methodology with an Application to the Dutch Stock Market.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 16 (02 1992), 11–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diz, F., and Finucane, T. J.. “The Time Series Properties of Implied Volatility of S&P 100 Index Options.” Unpubl. Manuscript, Syracuse Univ. (05 1991).Google Scholar
Duan, J. C. “The Garch Option Pricing Model.” Mathematical Finance (forthcoming 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F. “The Behavior of Stock Market Prices.” Journal of Business, 38 (01 1965), 34–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinstein, S. “The Black-Scholes Formula is Nearly Linear in σ for At-The-Money Options.” Presentation at the AFA Conference, December 1990, Washington, DC (12 1989).Google Scholar
French, K. R.; Schwert, G. W.; and Stambaugh, R. E.. “Expected Stock Returns and Volatility.” Journal of Financial Economics, 19 (09 1987), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geske, R. “The Valuation of Compound Options.” Journal of Financial Economics, 7 (03 1979), 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, C. R., and Whaley, R. E.. “Market Volatility Prediction and the Efficiency of the S&P 100 Index Option Market.” Journal of Financial Economics, (1991a), forthcoming.Google Scholar
Harvey, C. R., and Whaley, R. E.. “S&P 100 Index Option Volatility.” The Journal of Finance, 46 (09 1991b), 1551–1561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, C. R., and Whaley, R. E.. “Dividend and S&P 100 Index Option Valuation.” Journal of Futures Markets, 12 (04 1992), 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, J., and White, A.. “The Pricing of Options on Assets with Stochastic Volatilities.” The Journal of Finance, 2 (06 1987), 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, H., and Shanno, D.. “Option Pricing when the Variance is Changing.” Journal of Financial and Quantative Analysis, 22 (06 1987), 143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. “The Theory of Rational Option Pricing.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4 (04 1973), 141–183.Google Scholar
Merton, R. “On Estimating the Expected Return on the Market: An Explanatory Investigation.” Journal of Financial Economics, 8 (12 1980), 323–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D. “Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach.” Econometrica, 59 (03 1991), 347–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagan, A. R., and Schwert, G. W.. “Alternative Models for Conditional Stock Volatility.” Journal of Econometrics, 45 (08 1990), 267–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pindyck, R. S. “Risk, Inflation, and the Stock Market.” American Economic Review, 74 (06 1984), 335–351.Google Scholar
Poterba, J., and Summers, L.. “The Persistence of Volatility and Stock Market Fluctuations.” American Economic Review, 76 (12 1986), 1141–1151.Google Scholar
Scott, L. “Option Pricing when the Variance Changes Randomly: Theory, Estimation, and an Application.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 22 (12 1987), 419–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, J. “Overreactions in the Options Market.” Journal of Finance, 44 (09 1989), 1011–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, J. “Options Values under Stochastic Volatility.” Journal of Financial Economics, 19 (12 1987), 351–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar