Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T10:14:48.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stock Price Behavior and Trading***

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Alan Seelenfreund ,
George G. C. Parker  and
James C. Van Horne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years, there has been considerable interest in the random walk theory of stock price behavior. This theory, as applied to the stock market, implies that past stock-price movements cannot be used to predict future market prices in such a way as to “profit” from the predictions. By not “profiting,” we mean that a trader using the past history of stock prices cannot apply mechanical decision rules that result in a consistently better performance than a simple buy and hold strategy. If stock price movements were to become systematic so that a “profit” were possible, proponents of the random walk theory argue that a sufficient number of market participants would quickly recognize the recurring pattern and exploit it. In exploiting it, they would drive out the opportunity for “profit,” causing the price series to approximate a random walk.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , September 1968 , pp. 263 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Alexander, Sidney S., “Price Movements in Speculative Markets: Trends or Random Walks, Parts 1 and 2,” Industrial Management Review (1961 and 1964), reprinted in Cootner, Paul H., ed., The Random Character of Stock Market Prices (Cambridge, Mass.: Mit Press, 1964), pp. 199–218 and 338–372.Google Scholar
[2]Brown, Robert G., Smoothing, Forecasting, and Prediction of Discrete Time Series (Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1962).Google Scholar
[3]Cootner, Paul H., ed., The Random Character of Stock Market Prices (Cambridge, Mass.: Mit Press, 1964).Google Scholar
[4]Cootner, Paul H., “Stock Prices: Random vs. Systematic Changes,” Industrial Management Review (1962), reprinted in Cootner, op. cit., pp. 231–252.Google Scholar
[5]D'Esopo, D. A., “A Note on Forecasting by the Exponential Smoothing Operator,” Operations Research, 9 (September–October 1961), pp. 686–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Fama, Eugene F., “The Behavior of Stock Market Prices,” Journal of Business, XXXVIII (January 1965), pp. 34–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Fama, Eugene F., and Blume, Marshall E., “Filter Rules and Stock- Market Trading,” Journal of Business, XXXIX (January 1966), pp. 226–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Granger, C. W. J., and Morgenstern, O., “Spectral Analysis of New York Stock Market Prices,” Kyklos (1963), reprinted in Cootner, op. cit., pp. 162–188.Google Scholar
[9]Jensen, Michael, “Random Walks: Reality or Myth: Comment,” Financial Analysts Journal, 23 (November–December 1967), pp. 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Kendall, M. G., “The Analysis of Economic Time-Series,“ Journal of the Royal Statistical Association (1953), reprinted in Cootner, op. cit., pp. 857–899.Google Scholar
[11]Levy, Robert A., “Random Walks: Reality or Myth,” Financial Analysts Journal, 23 (November–December 1967), pp. 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Mandelbrot, Benoit, “Forecasts of Future Prices, Unbiased Markets, and ‘Martingale1’ Models,” Journal of Business, XXXIX (January 1966), pp. 242–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Moore, Arnold B., “Some Characteristics of Changes in Common Stock Prices,” reprinted in Cootner, op. cit., pp. 162–188.Google Scholar
[14]Neiderhoffer, Victor, and Osborne, M. F. M., “Market Making and Reversal on the Stock Exchange,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 61 (December 1966), pp. 897–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Van Home, James C., and Parker, George G. C., “The Random Walk Theory: An Empirical Test,” Financial Analysts Journal 23 (November–December 1967), pp. 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar